SYD weight restrictions
#11
Originally Posted by Long Haul;[url=tel:3508961
3508961[/url]]“Burn fuel off at the end of the runway to be legal for takeoff,” do people really do that?
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 740
Likes: 38
Not trying to second guess anyone here, I’m just trying to understand the different ways of doing things in different cultures. If I had an incident and all of the guys in suits got involved, I am confident that the fact that we didn’t burn off enough taxi fuel would not be an issue, unless it directly or indirectly contributed to the cause of the incident. The airline that I work for most definitely does not have a dangerous culture, and appears regularly on the list of the 20 safest airlines in the world, but I have genuinely never heard of anyone here burning fuel at the end of the runway to lower the weight. Like I said, we really have no idea what the exact actual weight is, so safety-wise I don’t see it as a threat. I guess that maybe the FAA in the USA is more aggressive in terms of seeking violations than what I am now used to.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Do you then have to wait until the calculated and the totalizer fuel are below planned takeoff fuel, or just the calculated? Because in the 777 there can be a big difference.
#14
Our airplanes tell on us too, although maybe the parameters are looser, I'll have to ask next time I fly with someone in the ISMS organization. I know for example that if I'm flying 300 kts at 5,000 ft I'm going to hear about it, but not if it's 260 at 9,500.
Do you then have to wait until the calculated and the totalizer fuel are below planned takeoff fuel, or just the calculated? Because in the 777 there can be a big difference.
Do you then have to wait until the calculated and the totalizer fuel are below planned takeoff fuel, or just the calculated? Because in the 777 there can be a big difference.
The calculated FMC weight at point of dispatch, which is advance the throttles on the runway for TO must be at or below MGTO.
Our flt management will hang us out to dry. Anything goes wrong, including something as stupid as hitting a bird on TO, they will pile on...."..and why did you TO over gross??"
Yes I understand we have no idea what the actual TO weight is. In fact, 3 SYD trips ago, I'm pretty sure we TO about 12-15k over gross. We did everything we could to save fuel, and still landed with less that planned. Oh it wouldn't climb worth beans either. Prove it? no way to do it. But, that FMC number is something you can point at and say....yeah, that's it!
So, to answer your question, it would be calculated. Unless you have some sort of fuel system anomaly, they want us to use calculated.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
I understand the difference. Yes, the airplane will tell on us too.
The calculated FMC weight at point of dispatch, which is advance the throttles on the runway for TO must be at or below MGTO.
Our flt management will hang us out to dry. Anything goes wrong, including something as stupid as hitting a bird on TO, they will pile on...."..and why did you TO over gross??"
Yes I understand we have no idea what the actual TO weight is. In fact, 3 SYD trips ago, I'm pretty sure we TO about 12-15k over gross. We did everything we could to save fuel, and still landed with less that planned. Oh it wouldn't climb worth beans either. Prove it? no way to do it. But, that FMC number is something you can point at and say....yeah, that's it!
So, to answer your question, it would be calculated. Unless you have some sort of fuel system anomaly, they want us to use calculated.
The calculated FMC weight at point of dispatch, which is advance the throttles on the runway for TO must be at or below MGTO.
Our flt management will hang us out to dry. Anything goes wrong, including something as stupid as hitting a bird on TO, they will pile on...."..and why did you TO over gross??"
Yes I understand we have no idea what the actual TO weight is. In fact, 3 SYD trips ago, I'm pretty sure we TO about 12-15k over gross. We did everything we could to save fuel, and still landed with less that planned. Oh it wouldn't climb worth beans either. Prove it? no way to do it. But, that FMC number is something you can point at and say....yeah, that's it!
So, to answer your question, it would be calculated. Unless you have some sort of fuel system anomaly, they want us to use calculated.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Originally Posted by Long Haul;[url=tel:3508972
3508972]No, that was a legit question. I’ve been out of the country for awhile, and while I would certainly wait for takeoff if an inspector of our local authority was on board, during normal ops at my airline no one is checking every flight to see how much fuel we burned before takeoff. The difference between max ramp wt and max TO weight for the triple that I fly is about 2,000 lbs, so even if you burn off NO taxi fuel you are still no more than 0.002% over max TOW, when in reality you have no idea what the exact take off weight is when you use standardized passenger weights. Safety-wise give me the extra fuel, I’m not worried about the weight.
The ACARS and FOQA data is sent back every few seconds. Even if you were stupid enough to violate a published limit, the whole world is going to know. If you don’t know the exact weight of your airplane, or the excuse is “well standard pax weights aren’t accurate”… good luck keeping your ticket. You fly for Aerosucre or some other shady outfit?
To answer the OPs question, our Pacific flying has been slammed full of cargo. Yes we are weight restricting non revs for cargo. We had less than 500 lbs for SA’s on one of my recent flights.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Thats a weird statement. Happens on long haul flights. Most airlines even add some sort of warning to the weight and balance like “requires taxi fuel burn”. I have never noted anyone not waiting since everything on a modern aircraft is recorded and saved somewhere. The FAA actually audits a percentage of international flights. I had a friend violated for being 400lbs under his required redispatch fuel at the RDP. He climbed early for weather prior to the RDP which put him under the required fuel but he knew he would gain it back at the flight planned step location. FAA audited his flight and was not amused he continued to the destination airport.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
So what do you do if, after fueling, the totalizer reads 500 lbs. less than the calculated fuel (common on both the 777 and 787), but both are equal to or more than your planned block fuel? If you taxi out and take off when the totalizer reads planned takeoff fuel your FMC gross weight will be too high, and you will apparently get violated. But, if you wait until the calculated fuel equals planned takeoff fuel, then at your first waypoint you’ll be 500 lbs. behind (assuming that you use the lower of the two values, as we do).
What’s an RDP, a redispatch point? I think that that is weird.
#19
Our 747s had a max gross weight of 875,000#, and a max taxi weight of 878,000#. Yes a shorter than expected taxi could result in a sit for a minute or three to burn off excess fuel.
Joe
#20
Our 747s had a max gross weight of 875,000#, and a max taxi weight of 878,000#. Yes a shorter than expected taxi could result in a sit for a minute or three to burn off excess fuel.
Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



