![]() |
Originally Posted by Chowdah
(Post 3533950)
The fact that when replying to Awax’s post, you took the time to delete the other part of his post which explicitly answers the above question is insulting to anyone reading this thread’s intelligence.
Your aim to straw man and fight any bit of nuanced position with accusations is so thinly veiled, I honestly wonder if you understand that you’re probably doing your cause disservice. |
Originally Posted by awax
(Post 3534584)
There you are, right on cue, classic.
“Apparently”? Based you projecting your drivel? Care to link a post where I support TI, TA1, or the best one - autocratic rule. Jerry, YOU are the guy who fed at the trough for years, took FPL, and bumbled your way through one of the darkest periods United pilots have known during bankruptcy. You sir ARE part of the problem, YOU are a career ALPA stooge. But, keep talking smack because there’s a whole new crop of pilots who haven’t heard of you, maybe you can fool them. What’s uncanny is your inability to address anything other than personal politics here. You’re not the future of ALPA, you’re only an embarrassing side note. |
Originally Posted by awax
(Post 3534672)
Context is everything, not that you ever share context that doesn’t fit your narrow narrative.
The context is my disdain for anonymous ALPA members (and self-disclosed apprentice members) setting up anonymous websites to recall LECs to which they don’t belong. In other words participating in council business to which they have no claim. That’s not how council representation is designed and it’s not how any bylaw is meant to be applied. I don’t think the outcome would have been any different with TA1, but I respect the ability of each council to guide their own outcomes. Jerry, did YOU participate in any coordinated effort to influence any LEC business post-TA1 in any council other than your own council of record. Is that how ALPA policy should work? You don’t have to answer, we’ve all seen you at work. That’s the context. You have guys like Dave Fitzgerald who conduct themselves in a gentlemanly way, but to come on here under a real name and act like that? In Jerry’s new favorite tool of deflection, that is “too funny” 😂 |
Originally Posted by awax
(Post 3534672)
Jerry, did YOU participate in any coordinated effort to influence any LEC business post-TA1 in any council other than your own council of record.
|
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3534690)
Nope, but I did get on this and another forum and tell people about the grossly dysfunctional MEC that I witnessed after many pilots asked my how TA1 could be so bad.
|
Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
(Post 3534870)
angry and bitter
Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
(Post 3463946)
From town hall: The letter was a result of a discussion between the Master Chair and the CEO. The SVP who wrote the letter was the messenger. The real information in the letter was that they wouldn't sue the union or seek TRO or run to the NMB if we suspended or delayed voting for 3 months while asking for more. Anyway, when someone offers more its probably a good idea to see 'how much more' especially when they have to come back in 90 days vs the 8mo-1y to start over would take...
|
Sooo, how’s the TA coming along….?
|
Every month past the “Let’s wait and see.” email… is another month of retro.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3534888)
Projection alert. I can only imagine how hard the C5 recalls were on you, but 3/4 of EWR pilots disagreed with you. In fact, for all we know you were one of those recalled. You certainly share their lack of judgement.
How ironic is the name of this thread? You thought we would have it by now. Too funny. |
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
(Post 3534936)
Every month past the “Let’s wait and see.” email… is another month of retro.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:01 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands