Originally Posted by Jb97 (Post 3543507)

MC Letter stated we will be adjusting our negotiating positions - the opportunity to agree to a subpar ask has been overcome I believe. “Waiting for the market” is a double edged sword. The company’s concern about agreeing to a deal that would not ratify (based on a subsequent agreement at another carrier) appear well-reasoned.

Originally Posted by Thor (Post 3543469)

Interesting, who exactly do you think “ALPA” is? For the animus and separation you’ve adopted, what do you think is owed to you, and by whom?

A repeating theme I see in your posts is “me” and “them”. Could it be you’re just not cut out to be part of a labor union?

Let me guess, less than three years on the property and former Air Force, current Guard baby?

Originally Posted by 01110011 (Post 3543509)

Imo if the company was being completely honest with their rationale there would’ve been a snap up in TA1.

Originally Posted by Jb97 (Post 3543507)

MC Letter stated we will be adjusting our negotiating positions - the opportunity to agree to a subpar ask has been overcome I believe. “Waiting for the market” is a double edged sword. The company’s concern about agreeing to a deal that would not ratify (based on a subsequent agreement at another carrier) appear well-reasoned.

Originally Posted by TyWebb (Post 3543565)

So what happens if you all get a clause for 1% more than Delta like they have on y’all? I’d like to imagine it would be a Anchor Man style fight.

Originally Posted by TyWebb (Post 3543565)

So what happens if you all get a clause for 1% more than Delta like they have on y’all? I’d like to imagine it would be a Anchor Man style fight.

Originally Posted by DashTrash (Post 3543297)

I am just shaking my head…. It seems like 90+% on here are so focused on pay rates. That is how dumb decisions happen!!! Take the shiny object, and not see the forest through the trees.

Pay rates are important, but not as important as work rules!!! I will gladly sacrifice pay rates for significant advances in Sections 5 & 20. Obviously zero concessions regarding scope!!! To me R & I is more important than pay rates!!!