![]() |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 3543297)
I am just shaking my head…. It seems like 90+% on here are so focused on pay rates. That is how dumb decisions happen!!! Take the shiny object, and not see the forest through the trees.
Pay rates are important, but not as important as work rules!!! I will gladly sacrifice pay rates for significant advances in Sections 5 & 20. Obviously zero concessions regarding scope!!! To me R & I is more important than pay rates!!! |
Originally Posted by Sunvox
(Post 3543135)
First no way our pay rates will end up 5% higher than Delta's so, yes, the percent for us will be less and MUST be because AGAIN . . . no way we end up 5% over Delta.
Imagine if you will we get a 13/5/5/5 offer with no concessions, minor QOL gains, and a bump in some non-tax areas. Then UAL pilots vote it down. Months pass and we approach a release date. The potential for a strike becomes front page news in all the media outlets. Just happened to the railway workers, and they got a contract imposed on them by Congress with one extra day off and a 24% raise. So you guys think we can turn down 34% in total raises and Congress will let us strike for more? Personally I don't think that is remotely possible, and I pray to God most pilots realize that as well. Fortunately, I think they do and will go on record here taking a WAG that the Delta AIP will become a TA and will get voted in 70/30 or higher. First, the rail strike would have effected a very large amount of the economy, and for many there are no other solutions for their freight. A major airline strike would not affect the same wide swath of the economy, and there are other ways to pick up the transportation slack left behind. This would reduce the political pressure considerably to impose a contract. Second, pattern bargaining really hurt them here. I think it was 8? out of the 12 rail unions had already accepted the deal, establishing a “pattern” demonstrating that this contract is what the industry would support. Pattern bargaining worked in management’s favor here. In our case, there is not this same pattern or even really the same structure. Third, Christmas shipping. |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 3543297)
I am just shaking my head…. It seems like 90+% on here are so focused on pay rates. That is how dumb decisions happen!!! Take the shiny object, and not see the forest through the trees.
Pay rates are important, but not as important as work rules!!! I will gladly sacrifice pay rates for significant advances in Sections 5 & 20. Obviously zero concessions regarding scope!!! To me R & I is more important than pay rates!!! |
Originally Posted by fadec
(Post 3543292)
The company was pretty smart to give that 5% raise early. It was smart of ALPA to accept it early too. Otherwise we might have negotiated Delta rates without it and then gotten the 5% raise on top, something so unaffordable it would sink the company.
|
Is it possible to see what our MEC and NC are even asking for from management? Even if it’s ball park or vague on some of the details. There has to be a summary sheet somewhere out there. I feel like we are in the dark like TA1.
It’s safe to say the trust just isn’t there. |
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
(Post 3543420)
Is it possible to see what our MEC and NC are even asking for from management? Even if it’s ball park or vague on some of the details. There has to be a summary sheet somewhere out there. I feel like we are in the dark like TA1.
It’s safe to say the trust just isn’t there. |
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
(Post 3543420)
Is it possible to see what our MEC and NC are even asking for from management? Even if it’s ball park or vague on some of the details. There has to be a summary sheet somewhere out there. I feel like we are in the dark like TA1.
It’s safe to say the trust just isn’t there. |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3543435)
I wouldn’t be surprised if our MEC ask was below DAL. They are now trying to figure out how to “save face”
|
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
(Post 3543420)
Is it possible to see what our MEC and NC are even asking for from management? Even if it’s ball park or vague on some of the details. There has to be a summary sheet somewhere out there. I feel like we are in the dark like TA1.
It’s safe to say the trust just isn’t there. Everyone is new once, but you seem overly clueless about process. This isn’t criticism, but an observation. How plugged in are you to learning about process? Posting on APC and expecting results don’t count. |
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 3543297)
I am just shaking my head…. It seems like 90+% on here are so focused on pay rates. That is how dumb decisions happen!!! Take the shiny object, and not see the forest through the trees.
Pay rates are important, but not as important as work rules!!! I will gladly sacrifice pay rates for significant advances in Sections 5 & 20. Obviously zero concessions regarding scope!!! To me R & I is more important than pay rates!!! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands