Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
4 Items in 5 Weeks | Company is Stalling >

4 Items in 5 Weeks | Company is Stalling

Search

Notices

4 Items in 5 Weeks | Company is Stalling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2023 | 05:55 AM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LJ Driver
Delta didn’t go first, we did.
Delta also did a poll of their pilots every 6 weeks during negotiations. Most pilots cannot be bothered to communicate with their reps - while also b!tching their reps aren’t representing them - and then turn around and b!tch when reps make the initiative to learn what that lazy pilot wants by reaching out via a just minutes long poll.

Not specifically at you LJ Driver, but most pilots should be happy the MEC is trying. Or maybe they just want to b!tch YMMV.
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 06:14 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
“Going first” worked just fine for DAL. There was nothing wrong with the environment; our pilot group & representation simply were not up to the job.
I use different definitions of "going first". Back in 2015 Delta went first but was the last to get a contract. They went first because they got a TA that was voted down by the pilots. That singular event sent pattern bargaining in motion because it established what was insufficient, It set the lower boundary. UAL did the same thing this time around(went first) as Delta did last round. We set the lower limit by turning down the Tumi TA, and Delta used that as a springboard (and the CEO flapping his gums on CNBC thereby irritating the mediator) to get a contract. Now AA has used the Delta contract as a new lower limit, and hopefully we will reap the rewards when we finally ink the last deal this contract cycle.

Semantics? Possibly. But the logic seems pretty sound as far as pattern bargaining.

Nonetheless, I have no problems with the polling, especially since a lack of polling contributed to the Tumi TA debacle and disenfranchised 4000 new(ish) hired pilots due to lack of input(concern) by the established junta. When you know best, who needs input from the proletariat?
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 07:01 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 532
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Getting halfway there doesn’t count in my book. We had a TA before them but they were the first to have a contract.
I suppose it does depend on your definition of first.

- United
- American
- Alaska?
- Allegiant?
- Spirit?
- Delta
- American again
- Westjet?

It may be a bit different as I’m loosely going off memory but since our initial POS TA came out last summer around 7 others have also been released. This doesn’t even include regionals.
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 08:21 AM
  #74  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Race Bannon
UAL did the same thing this time around(went first) as Delta did last round. We set the lower limit by turning down the Tumi TA, and Delta used that as a springboard (and the CEO flapping his gums on CNBC thereby irritating the mediator) to get a contract. Now AA has used the Delta contract as a new lower limit, and hopefully we will reap the rewards when we finally ink the last deal this contract cycle.

Semantics? Possibly. But the logic seems pretty sound as far as pattern bargaining.
Semantics, indeed. I’d say “setting the lower limit” is a very generous way of framing our colosal failure, but your timeline is off. Remember, Delta already had their TA by the time we actually got around to voting on ours. Our no vote was nothing more than us cleaning up our own mess, & absolutely no one “spring-boarded” off of us.
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 11:18 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Semantics, indeed. I’d say “setting the lower limit” is a very generous way of framing our colosal failure, but your timeline is off. Remember, Delta already had their TA by the time we actually got around to voting on ours. Our no vote was nothing more than us cleaning up our own mess, & absolutely no one “spring-boarded” off of us.
No I think my timing is pretty accurate.. The unmitigated disaster was the first rim shot which was almost 1 year ago in Jun 2022 if I'm not mistaken. It was such a colossal failure they held the vote in abeyance until almost 6 months later. That set the bar for what was unacceptable on the lower end with the sky being the limit on the top end. UAL was essentially leading the charge in pattern bargaining(not an enviable position usually). I see it as pattern bargaining off the initial spring board that UAL set. Numerous carriers easily inked deals better than our first turd sandwich. UAL is basically mimicking what Delta went through in 2015 which was TA turn down, recalls, new plan of attack(took a year)

Nonetheless, my real point was, there is nothing wrong with phone polling. Their lack of even including 4000 pilots and their thoughts was a template for automatic failure when bringing forth such a weak initial TA(as we lead the pack)
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 11:38 AM
  #76  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Race Bannon
I use different definitions of "going first". Back in 2015 Delta went first but was the last to get a contract. They went first because they got a TA that was voted down by the pilots. That singular event sent pattern bargaining in motion because it established what was insufficient, It set the lower boundary. UAL did the same thing this time around(went first) as Delta did last round. We set the lower limit by turning down the Tumi TA, and Delta used that as a springboard (and the CEO flapping his gums on CNBC thereby irritating the mediator) to get a contract. Now AA has used the Delta contract as a new lower limit, and hopefully we will reap the rewards when we finally ink the last deal this contract cycle.

Semantics? Possibly. But the logic seems pretty sound as far as pattern bargaining.

Nonetheless, I have no problems with the polling, especially since a lack of polling contributed to the Tumi TA debacle and disenfranchised 4000 new(ish) hired pilots due to lack of input(concern) by the established junta. When you know best, who needs input from the proletariat?
Well Delta's 2015 NO vote definitely didn't give any benefit for us with pattern bargaining since this pilot group decided to renew our concessionary contract.
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 01:54 PM
  #77  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Race Bannon
No I think my timing is pretty accurate.. The unmitigated disaster was the first rim shot which was almost 1 year ago in Jun 2022 if I'm not mistaken. It was such a colossal failure they held the vote in abeyance until almost 6 months later. That set the bar for what was unacceptable on the lower end with the sky being the limit on the top end. UAL was essentially leading the charge in pattern bargaining(not an enviable position usually). I see it as pattern bargaining off the initial spring board that UAL set. Numerous carriers easily inked deals better than our first turd sandwich. UAL is basically mimicking what Delta went through in 2015 which was TA turn down, recalls, new plan of attack(took a year)
To say we set any kind of bar with TUMI is laughable. No one needed us to come out with that TA in order to move forward in their negotiations. We wasted time & offered nothing to the profession, plain & simple.

Again, a little history: it was AA management’s offer to their pilots to exceed our TUMI contract that first turned the tide of opinion against TUMI here at UAL- followed by DAL’s TA. (Absent those 2 factors, I’m not even positive it wouldn’t have passed here.) By the time we finally voted on our TA, we absolutely were pattern bargaining off of them- not the other way around.

I would love to be in the room when you tell a bunch of DAL/AA pilots they’re free to thank you for “establishing a floor of what was acceptable”!
Reply
Old 05-20-2023 | 06:27 PM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
To say we set any kind of bar with TUMI is laughable. No one needed us to come out with that TA in order to move forward in their negotiations. We wasted time & offered nothing to the profession, plain & simple.

Again, a little history: it was AA management’s offer to their pilots to exceed our TUMI contract that first turned the tide of opinion against TUMI here at UAL- followed by DAL’s TA. (Absent those 2 factors, I’m not even positive it wouldn’t have passed here.) By the time we finally voted on our TA, we absolutely were pattern bargaining off of them- not the other way around.

I would love to be in the room when you tell a bunch of DAL/AA pilots they’re free to thank you for “establishing a floor of what was acceptable”!
this ^^^^^^
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLURCEO
Corporate
26
03-19-2019 03:30 PM
Sailor
Spirit
14254
10-09-2015 07:55 AM
InformationEcho
American
75
01-30-2015 10:50 AM
vandypilot
Major
14
02-17-2012 08:09 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
4
05-04-2006 06:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices