Go back to apologizing for the company. If you don't understand the reference, then I can't help you.

i think I know what you are getting at….but don’t imply that our reserve is good

never said it was. I voted to fix it back it 2015…..but it wasn’t bad enough then for those that wanted the money…..now the system is outrageous.

I just find the hypocrisy fascinating.

Almost half or more of our seniority list was hired after the last CBA vote. The majority of which came from different airlines that have drastically better reserve rules. It's not hypocrisy, it's a different generation of pilots that actually want QOL and not only hard dollars per hour.

You could try to explain why you called pilots that chose to exercise their seniority *****s, but instead it’s deny, divert, deflect - what a loser.

I expect both, why don’t you?

Cry harder.

I also expect both. My response was to the original comment saying they didn't understand why people were just now complaining about QOL, which again is because we have a much younger group of pilots now that, about half the seniority list, hired since the contract extension was signed that actually value QOL and won't just vote in a contract because it matches delta pay rates.

Back to the vacancy. I may be wrong, but isn’t the most junior pilot based in Denver on the 320? that, along with the additional vacancies for Airbus Den, Why wouldn’t 320 be the fastest path to Denver? I understand that seniority progression would be quicker on the 737.

Because Denver base growth and the choices of pilots moving in and out are idiosyncratic. This is not “how long does it take to take a 16 foot deep hole if you dig 2 feet a day.” The larger (and growing) fleet is more likely to have steady availability. But realistically, that probably means or two or three month difference at most.