Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Maui 777 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/144099-maui-777-a.html)

Myfingershurt 08-11-2023 06:36 AM


Originally Posted by Nordhavn (Post 3680960)
Would a full thrust T/O at flaps 20 on a 5 hour flight pitch out at 20 degrees? I hadn't heard they pitched down to minus 10 in their "recovery". That is very curious.

yeah, seems to me if you were worried about over speeding flaps, like the captain mentioned, you would pitch up (to bleed off airspeed), not down. Don’t understand that maneuver.

Nordhavn 08-11-2023 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by Myfingershurt (Post 3680977)
yeah, seems to me if you were worried about over speeding flaps, like the captain mentioned, you would pitch up (to bleed off airspeed), not down. Don’t understand that maneuver.

Something just ain't adding up here. This thing reads as a total loss of situational awareness. Just after this happened people were speculating that the FO accidentally went to flaps up and they were in stall recovery mode but this just is very bizarre.

sleeves 08-11-2023 06:57 AM


Originally Posted by JoePatroni;[url=tel:3680927
3680927[/url]]No thanks.

Why would you not want to use the intercom? At Continental, on the 737 almost nobody used it. I can’t tell you how many times I couldn’t hear the other pilot or ATC clearly. In the last 10 years it has become a norm to use. I can hear everything clearly. I can’t imagine not using it now. It is just one less thing to struggle with.

AllYourBaseAreB 08-11-2023 07:09 AM

The NTSB report is short. Just read it. From my casual look, it seems like a hand flying captain became distracted in the clouds/bumps to look at the EICAS and/or trouble shoot after a botched cleanup after T/O. I don’t know 777 procedures. Lots of possible contributing factors on how/why that could have happened but no CVR and conflicting pilot accounts.

my big wonder was why level off in an overspeed?

AbjectFutility 08-11-2023 07:15 AM


Originally Posted by bigr3d (Post 3680919)
Do we know if they were using it or not?
Maybe should be a new policy of intercom use below 10 or 18? Or an individual policy discussed in the briefing.

We don't do individual policy here...contrary to what some think. I think you mean a technique that you brief and coordinate with other crew. Even as the Captain, it would be more of a request than a directive. The alternative is effective VVM.

sailingfun 08-11-2023 07:35 AM


Originally Posted by Nordhavn (Post 3680960)
Would a full thrust T/O at flaps 20 on a 5 hour flight pitch out at 20 degrees? I hadn't heard they pitched down to minus 10 in their "recovery". That is very curious.

They were over 16 degrees nose down descending at about 150 feet per second at one point. The pullout was 2.66 G’s at the peak with flaps extended. The 777 is a tough airplane!

14:50:51– Vertical speed and pitch attitude continued a negative downward trend to reach a maximum of -8,536 feet per minute and -16.74 degrees respectively while at 1,386 feet (radio altitude)

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Documen...%20UAL-Rel.pdf

Nordhavn 08-11-2023 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3681016)
They were over 15 degrees nose down descending at about 150 feet per second at one point. The pullout was 2.66 G’s at the peak with flaps extended. The 777 is a tough airplane!

15 DOWN! I had not heard that. Thank God for EGPWS. Thanks for the info.

CRJCapitan 08-11-2023 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3681016)
They were over 16 degrees nose down descending at about 150 feet per second at one point. The pullout was 2.66 G’s at the peak with flaps extended. The 777 is a tough airplane!

14:50:51– Vertical speed and pitch attitude continued a negative downward trend to reach a maximum of -8,536 feet per minute and -16.74 degrees respectively while at 1,386 feet (radio altitude)

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Documen...%20UAL-Rel.pdf

That puts it at less than 10 seconds from impact at that rate...

John Carr 08-11-2023 08:47 AM

This thread is a genius psyop, took all the attention off the crunched 76 thread.

Nordhavn 08-11-2023 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by John Carr (Post 3681061)
This thread is a genius psyop, took all the attention off the crunched 76 thread.


Almost 3 hull losses in as many years. Been a rough couple of years for UAL. Plus the Airbus that is still down from the tail strike.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands