Search

Notices

MCO Base Timelines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2025 | 02:22 PM
  #61  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ripinpeace
If you’re truly long-term looking at FL. AA/MIA if you live south of TPA/St. Pete or DL/ATL if you live in or north of those cities.

MCO for UA will likely close in the next major downturn before its adds another category/expands it’s never gonna be one airlines hub (e.g. nowhere to expand, too low fare, too much competition). The U.S. southeast is a clear weakness in UA’s network and right now no potential to grow; just like Delta in TX or AA in pacific NW. Plus, the second you get tired of driving to fly a 737 you’ll be commuting to EWR/IAD (low frequency/lots of commuters) or IAH (senior base, low frequency, lots of commuters) both of which are mostly on 737’s (1 JS can’t be reserved).

FL commuting to ATL does have high loads, but bookable JS, high frequency on large planes, yellow slipping to only need 1 commute flight, and P.S. on the backup makes it much easier than people make it out to be + it’s an hour flight or less. ATL is also HQ (career opportunity/training center) and has 5,000+ pilots based there, seniority will always move steady there, and WB flying is night&day better than MIA. Pure speculation, but Delta is doing some interesting growth in Tampa; being the anchor tenant for new terminal/gates. Maybe a MCO/TPA 320 or 737 base once fleets consolidate more? Delta already does intl. & domestic WB flying out of TPA and MCO on their own metal with Skyteam in general dominating the TPA/MCO market.

If you can drive to MIA in south Florida that’s a clear winner. But, AA/DL’s financial performance would be a factor in on my decision as well and how you see each company performing in the near & far future.

p.s. these are my own opinions/experiences on the matter. Please take it as such
Awesome reply here !
I live in MCO, got CJO with UA, AA and UPS... But no DL. Gathering as much info as possible to make my crystal ball less hazy. Time to make the decision is coming soon. Thanks for the help !
Reply
Old 03-25-2025 | 03:35 PM
  #62  
Ripinpeace's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 450
Likes: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Exfriedbacon
Awesome reply here !
I live in MCO, got CJO with UA, AA and UPS... But no DL. Gathering as much info as possible to make my crystal ball less hazy. Time to make the decision is coming soon. Thanks for the help !
I would put UPS as a distant 3rd, personally. There is so much more potential (seniority & finances) to be had at United & American; especially when both have bases in FL and if you ever do decide to move for whatever reason both offer much more flexibility than UPS (plus non-rev is a nice thing to have). You’re in a great spot, you can’t really go wrong.

Best of luck!
Reply
Old 03-25-2025 | 03:43 PM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 892
Likes: 151
Default

Originally Posted by Exfriedbacon
I live in MCO, got CJO with UA, AA and UPS.!
I don't know how United wouldn't be the best option. You can commute for all of them, but you can only live in base for United. even if it takes a year to get there and it closes in 2030 ... you're no worse off.
Reply
Old 03-25-2025 | 05:17 PM
  #64  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 162
Default

Originally Posted by Ripinpeace
If you’re truly long-term looking at FL. AA/MIA if you live south of TPA/St. Pete or DL/ATL if you live in or north of those cities.

MCO for UA will likely close in the next major downturn before its adds another category/expands it’s never gonna be one airlines hub (e.g. nowhere to expand, too low fare, too much competition). The U.S. southeast is a clear weakness in UA’s network and right now no potential to grow; just like Delta in TX or AA in pacific NW. Plus, the second you get tired of driving to fly a 737 you’ll be commuting to EWR/IAD (low frequency/lots of commuters) or IAH (senior base, low frequency, lots of commuters) both of which are mostly on 737’s (1 JS can’t be reserved).

FL commuting to ATL does have high loads, but bookable JS, high frequency on large planes, yellow slipping to only need 1 commute flight, and P.S. on the backup makes it much easier than people make it out to be + it’s an hour flight or less. ATL is also HQ (career opportunity/training center) and has 5,000+ pilots based there, seniority will always move steady there, and WB flying is night&day better than MIA. Pure speculation, but Delta is doing some interesting growth in Tampa; being the anchor tenant for new terminal/gates. Maybe a MCO/TPA 320 or 737 base once fleets consolidate more? Delta already does intl. & domestic WB flying out of TPA and MCO on their own metal with Skyteam in general dominating the TPA/MCO market.

If you can drive to MIA in south Florida that’s a clear winner. But, AA/DL’s financial performance would be a factor in on my decision as well and how you see each company performing in the near & far future.

p.s. these are my own opinions/experiences on the matter. Please take it as such
A few things here that I disagree with.

SE is a weakness and management does acknowledge that. That said, MCO yields good results. It won’t be going anywhere. In fact, UA just signed a 30 year (with an additional 10 year option) $300 million dollar contract with MCO for additional hanger and office space. That said, management said that they want to get “A+’s” in the hubs before trying to grow bases like MCO and LAS. With more planes showing up, MCO will grow (unknown by how much) along with other bases.

As far as commuting in the short term goes, EWR is your best bet. I’ve seen as much as 20 flights a day (spread across UA, NK, and JB) up to EWR. It usually averages around 14-16 flights a day though. Getting to work is a none issue. IAD/IAH have less frequency. Though, idk the exact amount. With DL making interesting moves in TPA, there’s a good chance that UA responds with its own growth plans in MCO/TPA (TPA is a co-domicile for the MCO base).

AA guys tell me that the MIA commute is awful and lots of them just end up driving to S. Florida. My DL buddy tells me that MCO-ATL is one of the toughest commutes as the JS is always booked up. Don’t shoot the messenger on this one.

I believe that UA is right choice here. Since you live in Orlando, going to UA is a no brainer. If for whatever reason it does close, you’ll be commuting (just like you would be at AA/UPS).

This is also just my .02 so take that for what it’s worth. Feel free to PM me with questions or concerns.

Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 01:04 PM
  #65  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

One of the common misconceptions around MCO is the low yeild question. While it is generally understood that Domestic US to MCO is generally a low yeild environment the same is not true for International to MCO. Most (not all) International carriers fly to MCO uncompeted. Iberia will be flying to MCO starting next month and pretty sure they can name thier price. Most passengers will pay a premium to not connect internationally..there's an enormous International market out there, especially South America to MCO. We will see if UAL ever decides to go this route.
Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 01:34 PM
  #66  
off weekends (if Reserve)
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by Ripinpeace
I would put UPS as a distant 3rd, personally. There is so much more potential (seniority & finances) to be had at United & American; especially when both have bases in FL and if you ever do decide to move for whatever reason both offer much more flexibility than UPS (plus non-rev is a nice thing to have). You’re in a great spot, you can’t really go wrong.

Best of luck!
This 100%

Ive gotten trolled for this, and I only have good intentions saying the following:

Important for everyone to consider: United and American are AIRLINES, UPS is a shipping, receiving and supply chain management company that utilizes AIR TRAVEL.
Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 02:24 PM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by coast in
One of the common misconceptions around MCO is the low yeild question. While it is generally understood that Domestic US to MCO is generally a low yeild environment the same is not true for International to MCO. Most (not all) International carriers fly to MCO uncompeted. Iberia will be flying to MCO starting next month and pretty sure they can name thier price. Most passengers will pay a premium to not connect internationally..there's an enormous International market out there, especially South America to MCO. We will see if UAL ever decides to go this route.
Better wording for us would be lowER yield. As long as we can get higher yields flying WBs on other routes we will do so all year long. Once we do have lots and lots of 787s THEN we may be looking at true MCO hub (2027 and beyond)...
Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 02:56 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by coast in
One of the common misconceptions around MCO is the low yeild question. While it is generally understood that Domestic US to MCO is generally a low yeild environment the same is not true for International to MCO. Most (not all) International carriers fly to MCO uncompeted. Iberia will be flying to MCO starting next month and pretty sure they can name thier price. Most passengers will pay a premium to not connect internationally..there's an enormous International market out there, especially South America to MCO. We will see if UAL ever decides to go this route.
Sorry,
Yields to orlando from anywhere are lower then most places. Its vacationers not business people. Vacationers book their travel months ahead of time and rarely pay full fare for business class. Just the nature of what Orlando is. Vacationers are looking for bargain fares as a general rule. You will never see an international hub in Orlando for United.
Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 04:13 PM
  #69  
off weekends (if Reserve)
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
Sorry,
Yields to orlando from anywhere are lower then most places. Its vacationers not business people. Vacationers book their travel months ahead of time and rarely pay full fare for business class. Just the nature of what Orlando is. Vacationers are looking for bargain fares as a general rule. You will never see an international hub in Orlando for United.
This 100% ☝️there's business alright .....it's just that it's the business of cheerleading competitions and not Novo Nordisk.

I used to go MCO like 6-7 times a month, there seems to be "Nationals" every week (or at least the Moms believe it's Nationals).......hey this helps us with revenue, so I say why not trophies/unaffordable trips to Orlando for everyone.
Reply
Old 03-26-2025 | 04:16 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 80
Default

Originally Posted by coast in
One of the common misconceptions around MCO is the low yeild question. While it is generally understood that Domestic US to MCO is generally a low yeild environment the same is not true for International to MCO. Most (not all) International carriers fly to MCO uncompeted. Iberia will be flying to MCO starting next month and pretty sure they can name thier price. Most passengers will pay a premium to not connect internationally..there's an enormous International market out there, especially South America to MCO. We will see if UAL ever decides to go this route.
Who doesn’t like to start their international trip to Disney by way of Newark?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longhornmaniac8
Republic Airways
378
12-23-2024 04:57 PM
btodd77
Southwest
80
08-31-2018 08:26 AM
flyingfarmer
United
32
03-01-2012 05:04 AM
djrogs03
Regional
338
09-01-2011 05:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices