Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Kirby Dipping Into Politics/End the Shutdown >

Kirby Dipping Into Politics/End the Shutdown

Search

Notices

Kirby Dipping Into Politics/End the Shutdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2025 | 09:52 AM
  #81  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 265
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
It actually cures it. Something like a 95% success rate. I had a family member that got it from a blood transfusion in the 80’s. Fortunately they were asymptomatic, but it cured it nonetheless.
I had an uncle in Italy that got HepC from a transfusion as well. It ended up killing him in his 40’s. The leaps in tech just over the last decade will be a game changer. Likewise, my father in law in MS had a kidney transplant in the 80’s and is still kicking. Outlived his diagnosis thirty years ago and he’s 78.
Old 11-06-2025 | 11:08 AM
  #82  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 110
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by DogPit
Examples were given two replies before mine and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
I dont think United's greenwashing via the investment in SAF or embracing of diversity speak is equivalent to a $1 million dollar blank check to the inaugural fund to get in the good graces of the current regime. The former seem to be the result of broader societal trends that were not solely mandated from the top down; the latter stinks of pay to play. It seems to be a false equivalence.

If there are similar examples of CEOs bending the knee/lavishing praise/writing substantial blank checks that rise to the level of obsequiousness we see today, I would love to learn about them. Where's that iceberg?
Old 11-06-2025 | 11:56 AM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 254
Likes: 151
Default

Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan
I dont think United's greenwashing via the investment in SAF or embracing of diversity speak is equivalent to a $1 million dollar blank check to the inaugural fund to get in the good graces of the current regime. The former seem to be the result of broader societal trends that were not solely mandated from the top down; the latter stinks of pay to play. It seems to be a false equivalence.

If there are similar examples of CEOs bending the knee/lavishing praise/writing substantial blank checks that rise to the level of obsequiousness we see today, I would love to learn about them. Where's that iceberg?
Greenwashing is absolutely a pay-to-play move. Pay-to-play is pay to play, the methods just look different when the political majority is different. Greenwashing still funnels money into the political machine just like donating to an inauguration. You can try to argue the differences in semantics but at the end of the day it is the same.
Old 11-06-2025 | 02:26 PM
  #84  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 110
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Freds Ex
Greenwashing is absolutely a pay-to-play move. Pay-to-play is pay to play, the methods just look different when the political majority is different. Greenwashing still funnels money into the political machine just like donating to an inauguration. You can try to argue the differences in semantics but at the end of the day it is the same.
If you really think investing in a new technology as part of a global effort to reduce carbon emissions is the same as directly donating to a party for a politician solely to stroke an ego, then we disagree on the mechanics of how things work.

"The methods look different"

One is a bribe, the other is a business strategy that happened to align with a trend of the day. I also don't remember any press conferences with CEOs for the sole purpose of flattering the president under the previous administration.

It is not the same merely because you proclaim it the same. It's not "semantics." These are the facts.

Again, still waiting for directions to the iceberg
Old 11-06-2025 | 03:18 PM
  #85  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 270
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan
If you really think investing in a new technology as part of a global effort to reduce carbon emissions is the same as directly donating to a party for a politician solely to stroke an ego, then we disagree on the mechanics of how things work.

"The methods look different"

One is a bribe, the other is a business strategy that happened to align with a trend of the day. I also don't remember any press conferences with CEOs for the sole purpose of flattering the president under the previous administration.

It is not the same merely because you proclaim it the same. It's not "semantics." These are the facts.

Again, still waiting for directions to the iceberg
You're absolutely 100 pct correct, but you can't reason with these people. I've long ago given up..
Old 11-06-2025 | 05:34 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,539
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan
I dont think United's greenwashing via the investment in SAF or embracing of diversity speak is equivalent to a $1 million dollar blank check to the inaugural fund to get in the good graces of the current regime. The former seem to be the result of broader societal trends that were not solely mandated from the top down; the latter stinks of pay to play. It seems to be a false equivalence.

If there are similar examples of CEOs bending the knee/lavishing praise/writing substantial blank checks that rise to the level of obsequiousness we see today, I would love to learn about them. Where's that iceberg?
You mean like the check written to the Biden Innaugural Fund in the throws of COVID? Keep those blinders on, they’re working great.
Old 11-07-2025 | 05:45 AM
  #87  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 439
Likes: 82
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
You're absolutely 100 pct correct, but you can't reason with these people. I've long ago given up..
It’s funny how you think you can’t reason with “these people” and you didn’t even bother to research the companies donation to the scaled back Biden inauguration during COVID. If you don’t continually question everything that both sides are saying you’re not reasoning at all.
Old 11-07-2025 | 08:25 AM
  #88  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 65
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by AF OneWire
It’s funny how you think you can’t reason with “these people” and you didn’t even bother to research the companies donation to the scaled back Biden inauguration during COVID. If you don’t continually question everything that both sides are saying you’re not reasoning at all.
Whatsboutisms are tools for those in denial. In any event, I’m sure most of you bought this ticket. Enjoy the ride!
Old 11-07-2025 | 09:47 AM
  #89  
SeaRider's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 1
From: Guppy gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by L8Z8
Whatsboutisms are tools for those in denial. In any event, I’m sure most of you bought this ticket. Enjoy the ride!

Whataboitism accusations are tools for those in denial of their blatant hypocrisies.
Old 11-10-2025 | 12:16 PM
  #90  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 100
Likes: 8
Default didn’t want to start a new thread

Hi, since the positive space announcement is related to the shutdown and I didn’t want to start a thread…
If I pick something out of base is allowed to PS? TIA
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
United
77
12-24-2022 12:14 PM
FriendlyPilot
United
124
10-07-2022 12:50 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
jsled
Hangar Talk
12
08-09-2011 06:08 PM
Copperhed51
Regional
7
04-18-2011 08:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices