Search

Notices

Profit sharing 2011

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2011 | 10:04 AM
  #121  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
As Gordon Bethune once told me "we're drowning closer to the surface (than our competitors)." It was a bad time for everybody, you don't have to be faster than the bear... you just have to be faster than the slowest one running from the bear. That said, this merger will probably be a good thing for all of us in the long run.
No, you'll just have more to drag down with you.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 11:23 AM
  #122  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek
I am sure UAL pilots would gladly hand over their "profit sharing" check for the 20% difference in hourly pay that CAL enjoys.
Well enjoy that 20% when you don't have work rules. A tale from the front lines:

"So I get assigned a 4-day trip worth 3:31 dh and 3:29 block with no guarantee listed. Of course I want to make sure that whatever the guarantee is, that it's properly reflected so that I'll be properly compensated. Scheduling told me it was a pay question and there's nothing they could do about it. So I called the union and was informed that our contract only provides pay guarantee for pairings with a layover greater than 29 hours - and since my longest layover between flights on this 4-day is just short of that, I was SOL! So there it is - another fine example of how our company takes advantage of our embarrassingly lax work rules!"

One UAL rig is 5 hrs a day, right? So without the 20-hour rig you'll lose 65% of the time, but hey you'll get 20% more pay on the 7 hours you do fly with 4 days away from home. Heck of a deal. You have no idea what you're suggesting. Bonus round: if you call in sick, the DH doesn't pay in CAL's contract--you'll get 3:29 pay for a 4-day sick call.

Last edited by APC225; 12-05-2011 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 11:42 AM
  #123  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by CALPilotToo
I guess you were one of the 58% ers in 2004 or an 83/85 hire.
Not even close. I wasn't here for the one and was too young for the other. I scratch my head every day how the 58%ers could vote in the rules we are working under. Then again I guess you can't really vote on rules if they aren't presented to you to begin with and you trust the company will create a good section 25 after the fact.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 01:36 PM
  #124  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

For my UAL friends who thought that combining with Us Air would have caused us to go out of business, I've got some awesome Florida swampland for sale. I'll bet that the newly combined carrier, (UA/US), would have sunk to the bottom a lot quicker than a stand alone CAL but I digress.

Its all conjecture and quite frankly doesn't matter so once again, lets move on and face our real enemy. The management team you guys were having wet dreams about several years ago.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 03:06 PM
  #125  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally Posted by 757Driver
For my UAL friends who thought that combining with Us Air would have caused us to go out of business, I've got some awesome Florida swampland for sale. I'll bet that the newly combined carrier, (UA/US), would have sunk to the bottom a lot quicker than a stand alone CAL but I digress.

Its all conjecture and quite frankly doesn't matter so once again, lets move on and face our real enemy. The management team you guys were having wet dreams about several years ago.
I think you find most of the UAL guys agree that it's time to move on , but don't expect them to join your circle - the right-handed Kool-aid be will be hard to accept, but that left-handed action you expect will not be tolerated at all.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 03:33 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FACSofLife
Here's some credibility from Jeff himself in an Aviation Week article that named him man of the year...

"Smisek is matter of fact about those days in April. “If US Airways had succeeded, our only merger partner would have disappeared. There was no other option,” says the man who now sits at the head of the combined United Continental. This argument was pivotal to his congressional testimony. While under attack for perceived anti-competitive tactics, Smisek held that the opposite was true: that his airline had no real growth opportunity and that without this merger Continental would eventually disappear."

Don't forget also, the UAL MEC Chairman has a seat on the UAL BOD. While she(Wendy) cannot reveal the confidential information behind the deal, anyone who can read a basic annual report can see the numbers in black and white.

Here's some highlights from the CAL 2009 annual report just prior to merger announcement in May 2010.

"The severe global economic recession significantly diminished the demand for air travel beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and disrupted the global capital markets, resulting in a difficult financial environment for U.S. network
carriers. Although we have seen some indications that the airline industry may be experiencing the early stages of a
recovery, we cannot predict how quickly or fully demand for air travel will recover, and continued weakness in such
demand would hinder our ability to achieve and sustain profitability. Moreover, although access to the capital markets
has improved over the past several months, as evidenced by our recent financing transactions, we cannot give any
assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing or otherwise access the capital markets in the future on
acceptable terms (or at all). We must achieve and sustain profitability and/or access the capital markets to meet our
significant long-term debt and capital lease obligations and future commitments for capital expenditures, including the
acquisition of aircraft and related spare engines.
Economic Conditions. The severe economic recession in the U.S. and global economies has had a significant
negative impact on the demand for air carrier services beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. Passenger revenue in
2009 for U.S. airlines, as reported by the Air Transport Association of America, declined 18% compared to 2008. The
decline in demand for air travel in 2008 and 2009 disproportionately reduced the volume of high-yield traffic, as many
business travelers either curtailed their travel or purchased lower yield economy tickets. Although recent improvements
in corporate bookings and revenue trends suggest that the airline industry may be experiencing the early stages of a
recovery, we cannot predict how quickly or fully demand for air travel will recover. If global economic conditions fail to
improve or worsen, resulting in continuing demand weakness and reduced revenues, we may be unable to offset the
reduced revenues fully through further cost and capacity reductions or other measures.
In addition to its effect on demand for our services, the global economic recession severely disrupted the
global capital markets, resulting in a diminished availability of financing and higher cost for financing that was
obtainable. Although access to the capital markets has improved over the past several months, as evidenced by our
recent financing transactions, if economic conditions again worsen or these markets experience further disruptions,
we may be unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms (or at all) to refinance certain maturing debt we would
normally expect to refinance and to satisfy future capital commitments."


Every CAL annual report says the same BS.
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 03:36 PM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by dumbfounded
I think you find most of the UAL guys agree that it's time to move on , but don't expect them to join your circle - the right-handed Kool-aid be will be hard to accept, but that left-handed action you expect will not be tolerated at all.
What "circle" do you plan on being a part of?
Reply
Old 12-05-2011 | 03:57 PM
  #128  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

"Smisek held that the opposite was true: that his airline had no real growth opportunity and that without this merger Continental would eventually disappear."

I was looking for this the other day and couldn't find it, says a lot about career expectations.
Reply
Old 12-06-2011 | 04:52 AM
  #129  
Daytripper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Capt. B737
Default

I was looking for this the other day and couldn't find it, says a lot about career expectations.
I was in the 1/17/2000 class and will be in the 1/10 class.
Have you changed your mind? Will you be choosing to remain on furlough, or will you be attending the CAL class?
Reply
Old 12-06-2011 | 05:21 AM
  #130  
cal73's Avatar
Redeye avoider
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 933
Likes: 14
From: 737 Captain
Default

I expect to be sharing a cockpit with most of you so I suggest we STHU cause we are all in this together.

Like it or not. That is something we all can expect in our careers.

WTH
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfaromeo
Major
132
01-24-2011 09:48 AM
windrider
Major
4
01-17-2011 01:18 PM
Indy
Major
7
12-06-2010 01:34 PM
A320fumes
Major
1
02-25-2007 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices