Search

Notices

Profit Sharing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012 | 09:54 AM
  #31  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by catan
I remember seeing something on this board about the CAL pilots getting 45 million for profit sharing. I looked for the post, but could not find it. It said the average CAL pilot would get 10,000 in profit sharing.
I'm UAL and last year I got a little over 9,000. This year I'm getting about 6,500. That's a big hit considering I had about the same gross pay both years. I'll check the other board to see if the infomation is there.
Five percent of W2. Unless the average CAL pilot is making 200k, I'd say that $10k was a tad high.

Last edited by APC225; 02-08-2012 at 03:21 PM.
Reply
Old 02-08-2012 | 09:58 AM
  #32  
SoCalGuy's Avatar
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Five percent of W2. Unless the average CAL pilot is making 200k, I'd that that was a rad high.
When you find that 'average pilot group' at the CAL pulling down those zeros, let me know where I can apply.
Reply
Old 02-08-2012 | 01:47 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
When you find that 'average pilot group' at the CAL pulling down those zeros, let me know where I can apply.

***********************************************
Reply
Old 02-08-2012 | 02:32 PM
  #34  
Ottopilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Average? I'd say its the top pay, not the average. I got $3900 last year. I don't expect too much more this year.
Reply
Old 02-08-2012 | 09:48 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Five percent of W2. Unless the average CAL pilot is making 200k, I'd say that $10k was a tad high.
The average per CAL pilot is $8500 gross. $40 mil div by 4700 pilots. Capt's get more, F/O's get less.
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 05:35 AM
  #36  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Not directed at you, APC225.

UAL LAX base blastmail
December 31, 2011

United Pilots of Los Angeles:


By now you've probably seen or heard about the company entering into a deal with the CAL MEC to give the CAL pilots profit sharing for 2011. This has generated a significant amount of email and message traffic to your local officers, so Bill asked me to take a moment to provide you with some information since John and I were at the last Special MEC Meeting while Bill recuperates from his shoulder surgery.

As I said in an earlier update, the current situation is not complicated but some folks have tried very hard to make it that way and that is unfortunate. The simple fact of the matter regarding profit sharing is that the CAL pilots did not have it because they had earlier given it away as a concession. Conversely, the United pilots had it because we received it in exchange for concessions given. In other words, our profit sharing has been bought and paid for with concessions that we continue to suffer under, month by month, year by year. The CAL pilot profit sharing was a concession that was meant for them to continue to go without, month by month, year by year, until they got a new contract and rectified that situation. Please remember that part: A NEW CONTRACT. That is where all focus should be and where all aims should lead.

With that in mind, back up just over a year and in exchange for agreeing to play nice with the company regarding the merger, the United MEC and the Continental MEC entered into a Transition and Process Agreement in the name of ALL of the pilots in which we all got a few items of value to us, some specifically aimed at one pilot group or the other, and some of which lasted for only one year and/or could be canceled by the company after 18 months. The only explanation for that is a lack of leverage – we certainly would have made them permanent if we could have.

Now those items all had very real value. The CAL profit sharing is probably somewhere north of $40 million and what price shall we put on the domicile protections etc.? Now that the intervening 1 ½ years are up, the CAL and UAL pilots obviously still want those things but we also, more importantly, want a new JCBA. With that in mind, the UAL MEC Leadership hatched a plan that they then discussed with CAL Master Chairman Jay Pierce in which we might use the fact that the company dearly wanted to find a way to include the CAL pilots in that company's profit sharing plan as part of a leverage and enticement package to not only extend the T&PA in its' entirety, but also to entice and incentivize UAL management to swiftly conclude a JCBA. This is exactly where our focus SHOULD be!
The current situation is simple and not as complicated as some would make it. When our side couldn't come to an agreement with the UAL side regarding PS, our side used an outstanding CAL contractual grievance to settle the issue. PS was given to us in exchange for settling the the grievance filed under our contract.

Along the lines of the communication from the LAX council, the low UAL pay rates were concessionary pay rates that UAL pilots were meant to live under day after day, month after month, and year after year until a new contract was in place. Hence by their own logic, they should not have been asking for pay increases in the T&PA extension talks. That would be hypocritical after all.
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 05:37 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by catan
I remember seeing something on this board about the CAL pilots getting 45 million for profit sharing. I looked for the post, but could not find it. It said the average CAL pilot would get 10,000 in profit sharing.
I'm UAL and last year I got a little over 9,000. This year I'm getting about 6,500. That's a big hit considering I had about the same gross pay both years. I'll check the other board to see if the infomation is there.
If it is truly "about 5%", most will see 5k to 6k before taxes.
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 10:30 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Not directed at you, APC225.



The current situation is simple and not as complicated as some would make it. When our side couldn't come to an agreement with the UAL side regarding PS, our side used an outstanding CAL contractual grievance to settle the issue. PS was given to us in exchange for settling the the grievance filed under our contract.

Along the lines of the communication from the LAX council, the low UAL pay rates were concessionary pay rates that UAL pilots were meant to live under day after day, month after month, and year after year until a new contract was in place. Hence by their own logic, they should not have been asking for pay increases in the T&PA extension talks. That would be hypocritical after all.
The first paragraph is simply delusional. J Pos wanted to get PS for the CAL pilots within the framework of the TPA. When that avenue was no longer available, he went outside the TPA thereby violating the status quo. To say that a contractual grievance was used to get $40 million is like buying a a pencil for $3k and getting a Superbowl ticket thrown in for closing the deal. The pencil is not worth $3k and your grievance was not worth $40 million worth of harm.

The $40 million the CAL pilots received is not profit sharing. Profit sharing would indicate the CAL pilots are receiving a % of the profits as a % of your 2011 compensation. You guys call it a grievance settlement. I would brand it as a combination management PR stunt and divisive employee wedge. Which one is bearing fruit?

What we should have asked for was a commensurate compensation of $40 million to maintain the status quo. Hey, I've got a fine pencil the L-UAL pilots can sell UCH for $40 million.
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 03:02 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
You guys call it a grievance settlement. I would brand it as a combination management PR stunt and divisive employee wedge.
I don't care what it's branded. Our MEC Chair can't unilaterally sign a LOA or JCBA, so I don't know what he possibly could have given away on his own that would adversely affect us. The way many on the CAL side see this is the UAL MEC was willing to sacrifice an extension of most of the expiring provisions of the TPA in order to secure a significant financial gain for the UAL pilots. They had to know the company wasn't going to agree to that.

It all depends what side of the fence you're looking through.
Reply
Old 02-10-2012 | 04:00 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: 73 CA EWR
Default

Profit sharing check is posted on payroll advice on the LCAL side. Should have rolled it into my 401K. Those taxes are hefty.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Regularguy
United
208
10-04-2016 08:01 AM
Regularguy
United
80
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
Coach67
United
19
01-05-2012 06:54 PM
alfaromeo
Major
132
01-24-2011 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices