New Pass Travel System
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Do you remember if CAL over 25 years got fire tickets? I seem to remember something about the average retired UAL employee with 25 years or more got free unlimited passes at a higher boarding priority. Correct me if I wrong, but the study said they only used 4-6 passes a year on average within 5 years of retiring and it dropped off considerably after that. So the UAL retirees didn't lose much and the CAL retirees gained. As far as active employees, it's close to a wash unless they use up their Vacation passes(commuting). Still think higher priority for commuters is a mistake.
Quit trying to make this MERGER about who gained and who lost.
The truth is, so far EVERYONE is losing.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Hey Rush, thanks for painting the rest of us with such a broad brush!
I guess that since I didn't serve I'm just a low life, sucking off the government teat. Along with everyone in my family, almost every one of my high school and college buds, almost every pilot I flew with at two different commuters, their families etc and a huge chunk of the American population that goes to work and pays their taxes.
I guess that since I didn't serve I'm just a low life, sucking off the government teat. Along with everyone in my family, almost every one of my high school and college buds, almost every pilot I flew with at two different commuters, their families etc and a huge chunk of the American population that goes to work and pays their taxes.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
#27
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Let me try this:
Under UALs previous pass travel policy, only retirees with 25 yrs or more were given a higher boarding priority and that was only domestic, no international.
This was the only group of people singled out for any special treatment.
Very few people actually liked this and that included the retirees themselves.
All other retirees -25 didn’t get this important domestic privilege.
Most of the 25+ retirees that I know didn’t even want to get on ahead of people with more “seniority”; they actually felt guilty about it.
Over the years many people tried to change this but the company was insistent that our 25+ people should get something and so they came up with this ridiculous idea because they ran out of gold watches.
Think about it for a moment; everybody is boarding by seniority, if this group lost this bump they would simply revert back to their original seniority and get on ahead of most of the same people they were getting on ahead of anyway. This was essentially a meaningless benefit and everybody knew it.
Importantly, this was the only group of people, boarding out of order.
Then along comes CO with all their groups of special people, boarding under numerous conditions and circumstances. Importantly here, they are used to, having groups with special “jump the line” privileges.
So they run a sham survey, form some committees and come up with this ridiculous set of boarding priorities.
Most of the people I knew and know were stunned by the fact that they didn’t even go to the bother of offering a choice for everyone to simply board by seniority regardless of active or retired. There should be no groups.
I don’t think the vast majority of retirees want better benefits than anyone else they would just like (and deserve) equal benefits, after all it’s the only one left.
I know a baker, when he was an active co-worker he got a bakers dozen and when he retired he got a bakers dozen.
Under UALs previous pass travel policy, only retirees with 25 yrs or more were given a higher boarding priority and that was only domestic, no international.
This was the only group of people singled out for any special treatment.
Very few people actually liked this and that included the retirees themselves.
All other retirees -25 didn’t get this important domestic privilege.
Most of the 25+ retirees that I know didn’t even want to get on ahead of people with more “seniority”; they actually felt guilty about it.
Over the years many people tried to change this but the company was insistent that our 25+ people should get something and so they came up with this ridiculous idea because they ran out of gold watches.
Think about it for a moment; everybody is boarding by seniority, if this group lost this bump they would simply revert back to their original seniority and get on ahead of most of the same people they were getting on ahead of anyway. This was essentially a meaningless benefit and everybody knew it.
Importantly, this was the only group of people, boarding out of order.
Then along comes CO with all their groups of special people, boarding under numerous conditions and circumstances. Importantly here, they are used to, having groups with special “jump the line” privileges.
So they run a sham survey, form some committees and come up with this ridiculous set of boarding priorities.
Most of the people I knew and know were stunned by the fact that they didn’t even go to the bother of offering a choice for everyone to simply board by seniority regardless of active or retired. There should be no groups.
I don’t think the vast majority of retirees want better benefits than anyone else they would just like (and deserve) equal benefits, after all it’s the only one left.
I know a baker, when he was an active co-worker he got a bakers dozen and when he retired he got a bakers dozen.
#28
And...the active pilots are the ones who have kept this company in business and give the retirees a place to use their passes.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



