UAL Pilots have been Played.....
09-04-2012, 11:54 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 114
When I Think of this Pilot Group the words whipped and Neutered comes to mind.....
How that place operates at all is a mystery......
In 2005 the NWA Pilots took action to amend our BK contract and it was changed in A matter of day's......
How that place operates at all is a mystery......
In 2005 the NWA Pilots took action to amend our BK contract and it was changed in A matter of day's......
Last edited by mvndc10; 09-04-2012 at 12:10 PM.
09-04-2012, 12:12 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by johnso29
Nobody flies any, so no. Nice try though.
Oh don't you wish nobody flew them for you guys. Those aircraft ARE 90 SEAT AIRFRAMES!!
please tell me your not THAT ignorant, all it takes one swipe of the pen and a day in the MX hanger.
09-04-2012, 12:28 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Originally Posted by mvndc10
When I Think of this Pilot Group the words whipped and Neutered comes to mind.....
How that place operates at all is a mystery......
In 2005 the NWA Pilots took action to amend our BK contract and it was changed in A matter of day's......
How that place operates at all is a mystery......
In 2005 the NWA Pilots took action to amend our BK contract and it was changed in A matter of day's......
What sir, are your real problems? We're here to help!
09-04-2012, 01:12 PM
#44
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Originally Posted by liquid
Oh don't you wish nobody flew them for you guys. Those aircraft ARE 90 SEAT AIRFRAMES!!
please tell me your not THAT ignorant, all it takes one swipe of the pen and a day in the MX hanger.
please tell me your not THAT ignorant, all it takes one swipe of the pen and a day in the MX hanger.
Not that I agreed with allowing more jumbo RJs, but you need to be educated on reality.
09-04-2012, 01:48 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Not that I agreed with allowing more jumbo RJs, but you need to be educated on reality.
The camel not only has his nose under your tent, he's sitting at the table drinking YOUR beer...
09-04-2012, 02:09 PM
#46
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Originally Posted by liquid
No, I do not need an education. I'll be sure and snap a picture of that "not a 90 seat" airframe and post it here for all to see... Maybe it is you and all your DAL buddies who need and education. Those airframes CAN be configured with 90 seats, and they are currently flying around in DAL colors.
The camel not only has his nose under your tent, he's sitting at the table drinking YOUR beer...
The camel not only has his nose under your tent, he's sitting at the table drinking YOUR beer...
It's funny how people chastise the Delta pilots for their scope, yet we have no one on involuntary furlough along with some of the best pay, retirement, and work rules.
09-04-2012, 02:10 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Scope is normally by seat limit and not airframe max seating. Of course you can write scope anyway you want. Size airframe. Weight. Seats. Personally, I think it should be "all flying/tickets sold/etc should be from our airline and employees, but that's just me.
09-04-2012, 02:17 PM
#48
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Scope is normally by seat limit and not airframe max seating. Of course you can write scope anyway you want. Size airframe. Weight. Seats. Personally, I think it should be "all flying/tickets sold/etc should be from our airline and employees, but that's just me.
09-04-2012, 02:24 PM
#49
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Even if we allowed it, they wouldn't be configured to 90 seats.
Plain and simple....The CRJ-900 is capable of 90 seats. Don't believe, you can read more via the link below. Here's some high-lights:
"The CRJ900 is a stretched 76-90 seat version of the CRJ700."
Bombardier CRJ700 series - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What have we learned here......The "CRJ-900" is "capable" of 90 seats. Will that be Mgt's next bite since the airframes are currently present?? I hope not, we're rooting for you.
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Even the 70 seaters are running around at 65 or so seats so they can have first class.
SkyWest CRJ-700's (under UAL Colors) that are in two class config total 66 seats (6/60). COULD these airframes hold "70 seats"?? You betcha!! Just like the CRJ-900 being capable of "90 seats".
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Not that I agreed with allowing more jumbo RJs, but you need to be educated on reality.
Last edited by SoCalGuy; 09-04-2012 at 02:36 PM.
09-04-2012, 03:08 PM
#50
Need More Callouts
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Originally Posted by johnso29
I won't disagree that the DAL contract could be better. But I don't think you have leverage to call it mediocre. Perhaps if a pilot group other then Delta would put a rung in the ladder we could do more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
