![]() |
FO 737 year 2, 3, 4:
Delta: 93, 109, 112 SWA: 97, 107, 119 Straight from APC. Looks pretty close to me. Delta will surpass them in two years when their new contract matures. |
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 1290137)
No wonder the public thinks we are all greedy.
Who gives a flip what the public thinks. I'd have you mowing my lawn for $1 a day if you worked for me. |
Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
(Post 1290192)
I'd have you mowing my lawn for $1 a day if you worked for me.
;) |
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 1290190)
FO 737 year 2, 3, 4:
Delta: 93, 109, 112 SWA: 97, 107, 119 Straight from APC. Looks pretty close to me. Delta will surpass them in two years when their new contract matures. Stop focusing on pay, just one of the cornerstones that is severely broken. Just vote no! Delta $123,125,126 Not even close. Straight from apc and much more realistic where everybody's seniority is. |
Originally Posted by thor2j
(Post 1290198)
FO SWA 8,9,10 $143, $144, 148
Stop focusing on pay, just one of the cornerstones that is severely broken. Just vote no! Delta $123,125,126 Not even close. Straight from apc and much more realistic where everybody's seniority is. |
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 1290203)
Well, its still a lot of money, and way more than I'm getting paid. I hope you all pass it. Year one pay for new hires is actually enough to where one can live without pinching pennies. If it passes, I'm applying.
|
Originally Posted by thor2j
(Post 1290205)
If it passes there will be no hiring for a long time due to the scope relaxation. This is why there is much more then stupid pay rates.
|
Originally Posted by thor2j
(Post 1290180)
Wrong, SWA rates are way higher.
DALPA TA Brief, SWA Comparison Based on productivity though SWA may have the opportunity for higher W2s. |
Is this worth the rates? If we are offered this scope are the rates worth it? L-UAL has already demonstrated what weight scope carries once before.
Would you guys be willing to have the contract now if there are these scope reliefs: 1. 400 70 seaters limited to 900 nm range? 2. 2016 sunset for unlimited 50 seaters. Not 50 seat airframes but 90 seaters configured with 50 flown by Skywest? 3. Basically park all Airbus, 737-700s over the next 2-4 years; after 2 year furlough protection? Be careful what UCH pilots need now. UAL claims of right sizing for a merger will be nothing compared to right sizing for all RJ domestic feed. |
Originally Posted by flybynuts
(Post 1290238)
Is this worth the rates? If we are offered this scope are the rates worth it? L-UAL has already demonstrated what weight scope carries once before.
Would you guys be willing to have the contract now if there are these scope reliefs: 1. 400 70 seaters limited to 900 nm range? 2. 2016 sunset for unlimited 50 seaters. Not 50 seat airframes but 90 seaters configured with 50 flown by Skywest? 3. Basically park all Airbus, 737-700s over the next 2-4 years; after 2 year furlough protection? Be careful what UCH pilots need now. UAL claims of right sizing for a merger will be nothing compared to right sizing for all RJ domestic feed. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands