Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   TA in their hands (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/70880-ta-their-hands.html)

Trip7 11-11-2012 07:58 AM


Originally Posted by El Gwopo:1290848
so your viewpoint is in the minority


So, almost all cal pilots are lying to me...great.

Can't wait to vote no though![/QUOTE]

We'll all be watching. I'll make you a wager, I bet you a $100 amazon gift card that there is no way you will hold 50 seat scope and get a new contract.

Captain Bligh 11-11-2012 08:25 AM


Originally Posted by LCAL dude (Post 1290859)
I don't know any right seaters at Cal who are willing to give up 50 seat Scope.

Although this is true, the real battle for this demographic subset will be SLI with the UAL furloughees. Keep in mind there is also a demographic a little farther vested in our careers that isn't willing to fall on our proverbial swords for scope, any more than a reserve 737 FO would strike to protect our A fund lump sum access.

The real solution here is an MEC or ALPA national leader with enough vision (and balls) to tell management, that what they propose will cause a riff within the pilot ranks. Therefore; we (collectively) wont tolerate, nor even tender divisive offers to the pilots.

Much like the company tossing the bonus lump sum out for the union to figure out how to divide however, current leadership is on a management career path and won't make such a stand until the union's bylaws prohibit or punish ALPA officials that run off for management jobs.

-Remove them from the seniority list.
-Make them sign promissory notes.
-Negotiate them out of training department jobs.

APC225 11-11-2012 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Bligh (Post 1290866)
The real solution here is an MEC or ALPA national leader with enough vision (and balls) to tell management, that what they propose will cause a riff within the pilot ranks.

A riff is precisely their goal. To tell them they're being successful in causing this riff will just result in smiles and high fives all around.

Trip7 11-11-2012 10:43 AM


Originally Posted by LCAL dude:1290859

Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 1290833)
Holding your scope at 50 seats is unrealistic and unreasonable. Only way you will keep 50 seat scope is if you continue to keep your current CAL contract and remain separate from UAL pilots.

I believe most mainline pilots rightfully see anything 76 seats or less and below 86,000 lbs a lost cause at mainline, so your viewpoint is in the minority


This is the same mentality that allowed RJs to be flown by regional carriers in the first place.

Instead of flying a 70 seat CRJ at regional airline wages, you should be flying it at mainline wages, on a mainline seniority list, with a mainline pilot career ahead of you looking forward to progressing to 787 FO and retiring as a 777 Captain. Instead you're stuck at a regional airline, at regional airline wages, praying your company is not whipsawed against another regional for lower wages and eventually eliminated. Once you upgrade to the left seat your career progression is over, unless you get hired by one of the mainline carriers, which are shrinking because of the outsourcing you advocate.


You shouldn't be telling us to give up the fight, Noob/lurking management poster, you should be screaming at mainline pilots NOT to give up the fight against outsourcing.

I don't know any right seaters at Cal who are willing to give up 50 seat Scope.

I give UNICAL zero chance of holding 50 seat scope in a new contract. It's a completely unreasonable and unattainable goal in today's airline environment. You'll say it's management koolaide, but I'm just being realistic. There is no legacy airline in the world that flies 70-76 seat jets at mainline. Heck, Iberia has Air Nodstrum flying the CRJ 1000 as Iberia express. Air Canada had E175s at mainline and now they are getting sent to a regional due to cost pressures.

I'll make the same wager with you, $100 Amazon gift card if UNICAL can hold 50 seat scope in their new contract. All I see is you guys pounding your fists on table, management pointing and laughing, and Delta pilots making tens of thousands of dollars more than your pilot group. Good luck!

UalHvy 11-11-2012 11:06 AM

We will not hold the 50 seat scope in our new contract.

LCAL dude 11-11-2012 11:07 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 1290932)
I give UNICAL zero chance of holding 50 seat scope in a new contract. It's a completely unreasonable and unattainable goal in today's airline environment. You'll say it's management koolaide, but I'm just being realistic. There is no legacy airline in the world that flies 70-76 seat jets at mainline. Heck, Iberia has Air Nodstrum flying the CRJ 1000 as Iberia express. Air Canada had E175s at mainline and now they are getting sent to a regional due to cost pressures.

I'll make the same wager with you, $100 Amazon gift card if UNICAL can hold 50 seat scope in their new contract. All I see is you guys pounding your fists on table, management pointing and laughing, and Delta pilots making tens of thousands of dollars more than your pilot group. Good luck!

In one ear and out the other, I'm sure one day you'll be flying a desk in the CPO, telling your pilots how they should be doing it and berating anyone who disagrees.

Good luck in your non-flying management career. If your airline survives.



Originally Posted by UalHvy (Post 1290939)
We will not hold the 50 seat scope in our new contract.

If you're not going to fight Scope for the junior pilots, don't expect them to support your fight to get your retirement back.

El Gwopo 11-11-2012 01:06 PM

We'll all be watching. I'll make you a wager, I bet you a $100 amazon gift card that there is no way you will hold 50 seat scope and get a new contract.[/QUOTE]

Maybe we won't. I am mearly relaying what the people I fly with tell me. I will be voting no. Seems you are angry at the prospect of holding firm on 50 seats. I personally believe DAL pilots let us down in an enormous way. When they voted yes, it allowed weak people to say,"DAL set the new standard" blah blah blah. Don't care....no.

Ottopilot 11-11-2012 01:18 PM

Ditto. No scope = "no" vote. Hold the line. Ignore the 50 seat RJ pilots drooling over 75 seat jets.

UalHvy 11-11-2012 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by LCAL dude (Post 1290941)
In one ear and out the other, I'm sure one day you'll be flying a desk in the CPO, telling your pilots how they should be doing it and berating anyone who disagrees.

Good luck in your non-flying management career. If your airline survives.




If you're not going to fight Scope for the junior pilots, don't expect them to support your fight to get your retirement back.

I am a junior pilot. I'm just telling you that the Scope in the TA provides for 70 seaters.

johnso29 11-11-2012 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by krudawg (Post 1289003)
I want my obama phone now.

FYI, that program was created by the guy in office over 4 years ago.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands