Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1291793)
Not being sarcastic. At first glance, I'll give the TA a B. Solid 80%. Good enough to pass and then get on with the seniority list. That's my opinion and prediction. Only time will tell.
Sled |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1291793)
Not being sarcastic. At first glance, I'll give the TA a B. Solid 80%. Good enough to pass and then get on with the seniority list. That's my opinion and prediction. Only time will tell.
Sled |
F'n Furious! UAL furloughees get less longvty
Originally Posted by 47dog
(Post 1291778)
No vote. Period. UAL furloughees screwed again.
|
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 1291824)
losing full longevity is one thing, but this is utter bs to actually go backwards. I had to have this clarified by the lax lec chairman to see if i got this right. According to the ta, after sli integration, we cannot have a pay longevity that is longer than the next scal pilot above us (which will be a 2008 cal hire for most of us). I have over 6 years of pay longevity and will now fall to 4 years according to the lax lec chair. How the hell can that happen? He says the cal mec voted for no full restoration, of course, but how can they legally set us backwards on pay longevity. Seniority is one thing, such as getting stapled to the bottom, but to lose time accrued for pay is a first for any pilot group. There has to be a mechanism to prevent this or is that called a 'lawsuit'?
|
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 1291824)
Losing full longevity is one thing, but this is utter BS to actually go backwards. I had to have this clarified by the LAX LEC Chairman to see if I got this right. According to the TA, after SLI integration, we cannot have a Pay Longevity that is longer than the next sCAL pilot above us (which will be a 2008 CAL hire for most of us). I have over 6 years of Pay Longevity and will now fall to 4 years according to the LAX LEC Chair. How the hell can that happen? He says the CAL MEC voted for no full restoration, of course, but how can they legally set us backwards on Pay longevity. Seniority is one thing, such as getting stapled to the bottom, but to lose time accrued for Pay is a first for any pilot group. There has to be a mechanism to prevent this or is that called a 'lawsuit'?
Make it our mission to fix it no matter how long it takes....plenty of 83CAL and 570 language...why not 2173/1473 in the next one! |
I'm with you sled.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1291793)
Not being sarcastic. At first glance, I'll give the TA a B. Solid 80%. Good enough to pass and then get on with the seniority list. That's my opinion and prediction. Only time will tell.
Sled |
NO!
Disgusted right now with my 'So Called Union'.. Both Local, Pilot Group wise (except for the 7 Reps who had the Guts to Vote NO) and National. Motch |
I are a Marine, so all these words, words, words confuse Mongo.
I think this says we get boned on seniority list integration AND don't get pay credit for the 7+ years many of us have been out on the street. Soooooooo, we'd get stapled AND not get 12th year pay for the 18 months we'll get on the property before the next round of furloughs?......Mongo no like.....:mad: Looks like I'll be growing old as Cubicle Willy, the airline pilot that was.....that is until I get furloughed from my government job after we plummet over the fiscal cliff and become Sequestration Nation. :( <<Sigh>> |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands