Correction on Longevity
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
(Post 1291981)
I've read that section too. Granted it takes a lawyer to understand a lot of this, but I read it the same way as Gypsy. Your longevity pay won't be reduced but any additional longevity credit you get won't go above the sCAL pilot senior to you. A question to be asked at the road show, not that it should decide the outcome since the rest of the TA is a joke already.
the longetivity credit is limited, not actual longevity. They use the date of 5/6/08, so basically 4 1/2 years of longevity. You can be credited longevity if you have less than 4 1/2 years actual, but only up to 4 1/2 years. If you have more than 4 1/2 years actual longevity (say you have 6), then it looks like we will not get any credit. Nowhere do I see that we will be limited in actual pay longevity to 4 1/2 years. You get what you have. In addition, it appears this credit limit last only until an SLI is in place, when additional longevity credit can be given beyond that given at Date of Signing, "...provided further that the application of such additional credit does not result in any s-United pilot having a pay longevity date that is earlier than the pay longevity date of the next most senior s-Continental pilot." |
Thanks for the reserve question answer EWR73FO.... I appreciate it!
|
Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
(Post 1292032)
Excuse my ignorance, are you referring to XJT guys hired after the UAL furloughees?
Oops, did I say that out loud? but yes some of that group. What may be 5% of any other group seems to be 30% of this demoG... They are however maturing as many are now getting married and having kids, taking care of some responsibilities etc... but there are more than a few that still live with mom and dad... |
Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
(Post 1292080)
Oops, did I say that out loud?
there are quite a few great Ex-Express guys over at CAL, but like you mentioned, some not so great. I just thought you referring to every ex-XJT guy, |
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 1292045)
Gypsy is correct. Got a call from the LAX LEC chair and he amended his statement.
the longetivity credit is limited, not actual longevity. They use the date of 5/6/08, so basically 4 1/2 years of longevity. You can be credited longevity if you have less than 4 1/2 years actual, but only up to 4 1/2 years. If you have more than 4 1/2 years actual longevity (say you have 6), then it looks like we will not get any credit. Nowhere do I see that we will be limited in actual pay longevity to 4 1/2 years. You get what you have. In addition, it appears this credit limit last only until an SLI is in place, when additional longevity credit can be given beyond that given at Date of Signing, "...provided further that the application of such additional credit does not result in any s-United pilot having a pay longevity date that is earlier than the pay longevity date of the next most senior s-Continental pilot." Gypsy |
The signing bonus on the CAL side is in essence a B scale distribution. If you were the highest paid before this JCBA, you will get the biggest bonus. If you were the lowest paid, you will essentially get a POS bonus.
Another sell out of the newest guys on the CAL payscale. You'll probably see widebody CAs get $80,000 while FOs that were making $30-50K during this time period get around $5-10K. Grats scab WB CAs. |
Originally Posted by unitedcop30
(Post 1291987)
It mentions in the contract about one movable reserve day, but then says global reserve has 6 immovable golden days off. What is the difference between basic reserve and global reserve? And the difference between one movable reserve day and 6 immovable golden days off? Are these two different types of reserve? Thanks.
|
There are so many concessions and gotchas contained in this POC, that it ought to be a slam dunk NO vote for MOST of us. I'm astonished at how bad this thing is.
Sled, as for the "gets" in this TA, I submit that you're picking corn out of something warm and steamy. I don't even know what to say, so I won't waste any time with your opinion. Have a great career. As for the TA The pay is marginal. The scope is a show stopper. Ever see an RJ in SWA colors? The retro is completely unacceptable and an insult. The reserve rules SUCK. 2.5 hours? In DC? In NYC? In SFO? LAX? Involuntary JM - nope. They need more bodies? Hire them. Increased Medical and Dental costs. Concessionary. The training pay is a joke. VACA pay is concessionary. Add on reassignments etc etc etc Its up to US now that the JNC has failed us so completely. Get out the NO vote. 7B in unrestricted cash. The only thing "industry leading" was the hubris with which this was unveiled. |
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 1291824)
Losing full longevity is one thing, but this is utter BS to actually go backwards. I had to have this clarified by the LAX LEC Chairman to see if I got this right. According to the TA, after SLI integration, we cannot have a Pay Longevity that is longer than the next sCAL pilot above us (which will be a 2008 CAL hire for most of us). I have over 6 years of Pay Longevity and will now fall to 4 years according to the LAX LEC Chair. How the hell can that happen? He says the CAL MEC voted for no full restoration, of course, but how can they legally set us backwards on Pay longevity. Seniority is one thing, such as getting stapled to the bottom, but to lose time accrued for Pay is a first for any pilot group. There has to be a mechanism to prevent this or is that called a 'lawsuit'?
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1291869)
Even if your perception is true, you still go from 85/hr to 114/hr DOS. That's a 34% raise. I'm just sayin
Sled |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands