Is the SLI already done?
#11
I see it coming out fairly relatively, with junior UAL guys getting a bit of a bump upward due to their longevity of ACTIVE service over the same relative CAL pilots. There will be some other factors that affect the placement by small percentages ie..career expectations. I don't see a windfall in the cards for either group, regardless of what ALPA merger policy is.
Don't get all ****y...its just an opinion.
Don't get all ****y...its just an opinion.
My friends at CAL all tell me they would like relative seniority, and I don't blame them. It would be good for them, and bad for me, alas.
And if thats what they do, then thats fine. But you just have to understand that while CAL is a great airline and there are certainly opportunities for earlier relative seniority narrowbody capts, UAL brings the big paying jobs in greater number.
So if the DAL arbitration was used as a model they'd say (pretending it was 3 to 1 widebody) the top XXXX pilots are going to be 3 UAL for 1 CAL and then do the same for mid body, and then the narrowbody (except it would be 2 CAL for 1 UAL mixing in the narrowbody).
That's only if they use that logic.
Doesn't matter either way, because they are certainly to make it confusing enough that we all shrug and say "Ok, that's the list"
#12
Someone just put that together for a comparison. Its not official LOL.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
Ok..I'm willing to listen here. Notice I did say UAL pilots getting a bump for their time in active service.
I don't see how ending up somewhere close to your pre merger position relatively is a windfall? You are where you were within a few percentage points adjusted for longevity, active service, and career expectations. How is that a windfall? Your not gaining or losing much.
Our guys relative to the end of the UAL list have been captains for years if they wanted to be. Super senior first's if not.
It's all moot anyway...just throwing it out there.
I don't see how ending up somewhere close to your pre merger position relatively is a windfall? You are where you were within a few percentage points adjusted for longevity, active service, and career expectations. How is that a windfall? Your not gaining or losing much.
Our guys relative to the end of the UAL list have been captains for years if they wanted to be. Super senior first's if not.
It's all moot anyway...just throwing it out there.
#14
e.
I don't see how ending up somewhere close to your pre merger position relatively is a windfall? You are where you were within a few percentage points adjusted for longevity, active service, and career expectations. How is that a windfall? Your not gaining or losing much.
I don't see how ending up somewhere close to your pre merger position relatively is a windfall? You are where you were within a few percentage points adjusted for longevity, active service, and career expectations. How is that a windfall? Your not gaining or losing much.
Btw, the widebody/narrowbody percentages had very little if any influence on the DAL/NWA list, it just didn't matter to the arbitrators. The NWA guys did a get a small bump (pull and plug) to makeup for the large number of NWA retirements. I personally was within .1 percent of my pre-merger relative number.
I think that the UCAL list will have some different factors than the Delta list, but anything more than 3-5% difference in relative numbers is unlikely imo. The worst guys at Delta (91' hires) lost about 3% relative I think.
Good luck to all
#15
And that is exactly why arbitrators have essentially handed out relative list recently.
Btw, the widebody/narrowbody percentages had very little if any influence on the DAL/NWA list, it just didn't matter to the arbitrators. The NWA guys did a get a small bump (pull and plug) to makeup for the large number of NWA retirements. I personally was within .1 percent of my pre-merger relative number.
I think that the UCAL list will have some different factors than the Delta list, but anything more than 3-5% difference in relative numbers is unlikely imo. The worst guys at Delta (91' hires) lost about 3% relative I think.
Good luck to all
Btw, the widebody/narrowbody percentages had very little if any influence on the DAL/NWA list, it just didn't matter to the arbitrators. The NWA guys did a get a small bump (pull and plug) to makeup for the large number of NWA retirements. I personally was within .1 percent of my pre-merger relative number.
I think that the UCAL list will have some different factors than the Delta list, but anything more than 3-5% difference in relative numbers is unlikely imo. The worst guys at Delta (91' hires) lost about 3% relative I think.
Good luck to all
CAL and UAL do not have that similar fleet mix.
UAL had 72 widebodies and 140 narrowbody. So 1 for 2.
CAL had 22 widebody and 240 737's So 1 for 10.
These don't count the 25 WB CAL had on order and the 50 WB UAL had on order, so it could skew the ratios a bit more.
BTW, I read the ENTIRE DAL NWA arbitration decision, and they used the size of the fleets and ratios which is how they came up with the three tranches of seniority. Yes, some people came out very close, because the fleets were similar.
But its simplistic to think they just made it relative for no reason and that they will do that with CAL UAL.
#16
Oh that comparison? You actually believe that is the final solution?
#18
It will be soon. UAL Blastmail
Arbitration hearings on the SLI have been scheduled to begin in April. All hearings will be open to pilots and their families.
All hearings will take place at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel,1330 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC. This hotel is located just a short walk from L'Enfant Plaza (which is also a hub for the Metro trains). Hearings are scheduled to extend for nine hours each day and will likely begin each day at 9 a.m. and end by 6 p.m. with up to a 90-minute break for lunch. Signage will be posted in the hotel entry and/or lobby to direct members to the hearing room for that day. A schedule of arbitration hearings follows:
April 15-20
May 11-15
June 11-13
June 18-20
June 27-28
Each side will present opening statements on April 15. The Continental Representatives will present their direct case April 15-20. The United Representatives will present their direct case May 11-15. June hearings are scheduled for rebuttal and sur-rebuttal presentations by both parties. One or more of the listed dates may not be used.
In addition, pre-hearing statements will be submitted April 11, 2013 and post-hearing briefs will be submitted July 25, 2013. All statements and briefs will be posted on the Merger Committee’s section of the MEC website once they are available. Links to the content will be provided in regular updates and on the MEC website homepage.
All hearings will take place at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel,1330 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC. This hotel is located just a short walk from L'Enfant Plaza (which is also a hub for the Metro trains). Hearings are scheduled to extend for nine hours each day and will likely begin each day at 9 a.m. and end by 6 p.m. with up to a 90-minute break for lunch. Signage will be posted in the hotel entry and/or lobby to direct members to the hearing room for that day. A schedule of arbitration hearings follows:
April 15-20
May 11-15
June 11-13
June 18-20
June 27-28
Each side will present opening statements on April 15. The Continental Representatives will present their direct case April 15-20. The United Representatives will present their direct case May 11-15. June hearings are scheduled for rebuttal and sur-rebuttal presentations by both parties. One or more of the listed dates may not be used.
In addition, pre-hearing statements will be submitted April 11, 2013 and post-hearing briefs will be submitted July 25, 2013. All statements and briefs will be posted on the Merger Committee’s section of the MEC website once they are available. Links to the content will be provided in regular updates and on the MEC website homepage.
Last edited by APC225; 03-30-2013 at 08:35 PM.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Section 6 - Seniority
6-A General
6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot
Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A
Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement.
The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it.
Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done.
Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print...........
6-A General
6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot
Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A
Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement.
The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it.
Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done.
Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print...........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post