Search
Notices

CAL vs CALex DOH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2013, 06:19 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default CAL vs CALex DOH

Would some L-CAL guys please enlighten us with the facts?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 07:19 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Would some L-CAL guys please enlighten us with the facts?
This should be good.
Blockoutblockin is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 07:30 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Would some L-CAL guys please enlighten us with the facts?
Here go's...until late 2001 early 2002 express jet (formerly continental express, all turbo prop until 1997) was a wholly owned subsidiary of CAL. Pilots from the original COEX all the way back to 88 (a few even more senior) flowed through to CAL in seniority order via negotiated flow through obtained by IACP representing both pilots groups as one MEC. CAL retained the right to hire from the street as well. CAL's list at the time would literally have 3 blanks and then a COEX's pilots name, even though that pilot was still at express waiting to flow through. That segment of flow throughs went on until the mid 90's. All those pilots kept their original hire dates for everything except bidding seniority, they were merged in to CAL bidding seniority when ever they actually transferred to CAL, with some back dating do to deferments related to express staffing.

Example....a guy hired at COEX in 1990 transferred to CAL in 1997, he effectively has a 97 bidding date at CAL, but retains his 1990 hire date for pass travel, sick bank, vacation accrual, and not sure but maybe some A Fund calculation as well.

With now "express jet" still being a wholly owned subsidary,The next segment of flow throughs came from ALPA negotiated flow through tied to the influx of the RJ, once you completed IOE as an RJ captain, you were put in the pool of CAL new hires and were to transfer to CAL as class dates became available, with even more deferments due to staffing (during which these pilots accrued CAL seniority). This segment covered pilots from Express through mid October 1996. These pilots assumed CAL seniority from their original assigned CAL class date.

Example...pilot hired at COEX in early 1996 flowed to CAL in 2001 was a 2001 hire at CAL, but retained 1996 for pass travel, sick bank, and vacation.

Next segment was preferential interview group, covers the pilots that were in the CAL pool but never flowed due to the termination of the flow through because of CAL selling more than 51 percent of express jet. Also covers all pilots that were on the Express Jet list as of mid June 1998. All those pilots were given a preferential interview. If you were hired you flowed to CAL as class dates became available in express seniority order. You stayed in your express seniority merged in with the off the street hires in your class.

Example a pilot hired at COEX in late 1997 interviewed and was hired by CAL in 2006 has a 2006 CAL hire date, but retains his original 1997 date for pass travel only.



Bottom line is everybody is in seniority order from express back to the mid 80's.

Clear as mud?
Wrsofked is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Don't forget the part where CAL pilots had a chance to fight for all pilots to be on one list thus gaining some control over the management tactic of whipsawing regional against major. Instead many fought against this and CalEx expanded going from 600 pilots to over 2000 with 274 RJs. CAL stopped hiring and progression stagnated then 9/11, then age 65. Never understood why the CAL pilots were so short-sighted as to let that opportunity to pass. It may have set an industry standard that could possibly have had an impact on what happened to UAL and their 737/70 seat debacle.
APC225 is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 08:42 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

What years were Continental Express pay for training?
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 08:50 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
uaav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 374
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer View Post
What years were Continental Express pay for training?
Pay for training?...Please tell me Continental Express wasn't one of those places in the 90's where "privileged" kids paid Flight Safety $10,000 dollars to get a job!
uaav8r is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r View Post
Pay for training?...Please tell me Continental Express wasn't one of those places in the mid 90's where the "privileged" kids paid Flight Safety $10,000 dollars to get a job!
Coex as well as most commuters during the mid 90's had PFT. A scourge on the industry for sure. Driven by lull in hiring and overage of pilots. The same "privileged" kids are
Getting hired today, (as if this industry has ever hired many "poor" pilots give me a break!) with the "aviation" (roflmao)degrees it's just cheaper for mommy and daddy.
Wrsofked is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 09:09 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by Wrsofked View Post
Coex as well as most commuters during the mid 90's had PFT. A scourge on the industry for sure. Driven by lull in hiring and overage of pilots. The same "privileged" kids are
Getting hired today, with the "aviation" (roflmao)degrees it's just cheaper for mommy and daddy.
Not all of the commuters had it. I know CalEx was PFT in 1996-1997. I just wasn't sure how many of the current CAL pilots fall into the group.
pilotgolfer is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 09:14 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
could possibly have had an impact on what happened to UAL and their 737/70 seat debacle.
You mean Merger/737 debacle
CHAIRMAN is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 09:26 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by CHAIRMAN View Post
You mean Merger/737 debacle
Bingo.

(For a dramatic example, just count how many 70 seaters were added to replace the 737s on the 737 retirement timeline. Hint: if L-UAL was intending to replace 737s with 70 seaters they really screwed it up.)
cadetdrivr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cgull
United
3
12-20-2012 10:15 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
CAL EWR
Major
81
07-25-2007 05:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices