CAL vs CALex DOH
#32
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Almost. I believe there were some (maybe they flew at Rocky Mountain/Bar Harbor or the other carriers who came together to create CoEx) who kept a DOH that predated showing up at CAL. Also, there were CoEx pilots who were hired and given a class date at CAL who were forced to stay at CoEx until sufficient replacements were trained. Those pilots DOH is their theoretical class date at CAL, though they didn't get trained until later.

I'd venture to guess that the small group being referenced that may (or may NOT) be pushing for some kind of adjusted DOH is the SAME small group I made reference to before during the 2006 era. And IIRC, it was some of the "P.I.G.S."
Wasn't anybody from the ORIGINAL FTA, the amended (1 year in the jet) FTA, or the "Shindler's List". Everything seemed to work out just fine for them and they're probably long past caring about any DOH.
#33
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
How about the MEC chairman - how does he fit into all this? I heard he was a COEX flowthrough as described above - but there were some other hijinks where he left to help start one of the undercutting upstarts. Go Jets or Freedom or something. The details are vague but it was explained to me that despite this he returned to CAL with his seniority intact.
If anyone can shed light on this - much obliged.
If anyone can shed light on this - much obliged.
#38
Banned
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
While we are throwing groups under the bus, how about all the UAL hires that came straight from interns in college to UAL with almost nothing more then a commercial pilot license and a year of instructing in a piper warrior. Or others with no qualification that get to check a box that others could not on their UaL application through out the 90s.
#40
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



