CAL vs CALex DOH
#11
Coex as well as most commuters during the mid 90's had PFT. A scourge on the industry for sure. Driven by lull in hiring and overage of pilots. The same "privileged" kids are
Getting hired today, (as if this industry has ever hired many "poor" pilots give me a break!) with the "aviation" (roflmao)degrees it's just cheaper for mommy and daddy.
Getting hired today, (as if this industry has ever hired many "poor" pilots give me a break!) with the "aviation" (roflmao)degrees it's just cheaper for mommy and daddy.
#12
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Why would it even be an issue? UAL hired from regional carriers that had PFT through the 90's also.
#13
xjtguy, It's an issue because apparently some from that group seem to think that the day Flight Safety got them their job at Continental Express should be the same day they were "hired" at United Airlines. I don't think so!
#16
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Seriously, is it a large enough demographic that it would ACTUALLY affect the SLI?
IIRC, TSA wasn't PFT, the others yes. Including BIZEX, JSI (now PSA), COMAIR, EpressOne, (PCL), CHQ. AWAC didn't have it, at least not in the mid 90's till it went away.
#17
No, I don't. No LCAL pilot was furloughed when CAL bought 274 RJs. Stagnation, but all kept their jobs. To go further, we were smart enough to get a flow back agreement tied to the flow through agreement. CALEX pilots came to CAL and in exchange, if there were ever a furlough ("that'll never happen") then CAL pilots (all of them, not just ex-CALEX) had rights to positions at CALEX by best DOH at either one. In the 2002 furloughs, only the most recent new hires could not hold positions at either, based on seniority, but most did. It would have been exceptionally beneficial if UAL had been able to secure these flow back rights when they entered their RJ buy, regardless of how many were bought.
#18
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
UAL: hey express carrier, we'd like you fly regional feed for us
Express carrier: we don't have the planes to do it.
UAL: you'll have to get some more planes and we can't commit to any agreement till you have the planes to do it
Express: we can't really buy/lease planes unless we know for sure that we're getting a check.
That's how it went for 1 of the then 3 UAX carriers at the time. AWAC may have been different due the on again off again/make up-break up-make up-break up style of dysfunctional relationship they had

The best UAL ever got on a concession round was the pref-hiring at the UAX carriers, no DOH or seniority, etc.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 737F
I thought that derailed mentality was pretty much squelched in the 2006-7 time frame?
Seriously, is it a large enough demographic that it would ACTUALLY affect the SLI?
IIRC, TSA wasn't PFT, the others yes. Including BIZEX, JSI (now PSA), COMAIR, EpressOne, (PCL), CHQ. AWAC didn't have it, at least not in the mid 90's till it went away.
Seriously, is it a large enough demographic that it would ACTUALLY affect the SLI?
IIRC, TSA wasn't PFT, the others yes. Including BIZEX, JSI (now PSA), COMAIR, EpressOne, (PCL), CHQ. AWAC didn't have it, at least not in the mid 90's till it went away.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 737F
Haven't heard that one at all. Relative +\- a few percent will be just fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



