Search

Notices

CAL vs CALex DOH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:29 AM
  #11  
uaav8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Wrsofked
Coex as well as most commuters during the mid 90's had PFT. A scourge on the industry for sure. Driven by lull in hiring and overage of pilots. The same "privileged" kids are
Getting hired today, (as if this industry has ever hired many "poor" pilots give me a break!) with the "aviation" (roflmao)degrees it's just cheaper for mommy and daddy.
Actually know all about it. I went through the FSI initial ($250) process in about 93'ish and was offered ASA,TSA, & NWAirlink interviews. Couldn't part with $10K so I ended up at a rinky dink scumbag commuter in GRI Nebraska with BE99's and 1900's (GPX). It had a "training contract" to reimburse if we quit. I quit after 1.5 yrs for a 727 job and never paid them. In 97' I was hired at UAL. Never once actually paid an airline to train me. I guess I was fortunate...Maybe.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:37 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wrsofked
Coex as well as most commuters during the mid 90's had PFT. A scourge on the industry for sure. Driven by lull in hiring and overage of pilots.
IIRC, the COEX PFT was on a matrix of hours. The more TT and ME an new hire had, the less they had to pay.

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Not all of the commuters had it. I know CalEx was PFT in 1996-1997. I just wasn't sure how many of the current CAL pilots fall into the group.
Why would it even be an issue? UAL hired from regional carriers that had PFT through the 90's also.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:45 AM
  #13  
uaav8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

xjtguy, It's an issue because apparently some from that group seem to think that the day Flight Safety got them their job at Continental Express should be the same day they were "hired" at United Airlines. I don't think so!
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:49 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 737F
Default

I know COEX, ASA, ACA, TSA which made up the bulk of the larger commuters were all PFT at some point. Eagle has never had PFT.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:58 AM
  #15  
flyboycpa's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

If I remember correctly, Continental sold it's stake in Express in 2001(ish) to effectuate the eventual merger nearly 10 years later. CAL was right-sizing it's operation.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:59 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
xjtguy, It's an issue because apparently some from that group seem to think that the day Flight Safety got them their job at Continental Express should be the same day they were "hired" at United Airlines. I don't think so!
I thought that derailed mentality was pretty much squelched in the 2006-7 time frame?

Seriously, is it a large enough demographic that it would ACTUALLY affect the SLI?

Originally Posted by Wrsofked
I know COEX, ASA, ACA, [b]TSA]/b] which made up the bulk of the larger commuters were all PFT at some point. Eagle has never had PFT.
IIRC, TSA wasn't PFT, the others yes. Including BIZEX, JSI (now PSA), COMAIR, EpressOne, (PCL), CHQ. AWAC didn't have it, at least not in the mid 90's till it went away.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 10:10 AM
  #17  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CHAIRMAN
You mean Merger/737 debacle
No, I don't. No LCAL pilot was furloughed when CAL bought 274 RJs. Stagnation, but all kept their jobs. To go further, we were smart enough to get a flow back agreement tied to the flow through agreement. CALEX pilots came to CAL and in exchange, if there were ever a furlough ("that'll never happen") then CAL pilots (all of them, not just ex-CALEX) had rights to positions at CALEX by best DOH at either one. In the 2002 furloughs, only the most recent new hires could not hold positions at either, based on seniority, but most did. It would have been exceptionally beneficial if UAL had been able to secure these flow back rights when they entered their RJ buy, regardless of how many were bought.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 10:19 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
It would have been exceptionally beneficial if UAL had been able to secure these flow back rights when they entered their RJ buy, regardless of how many were bought.
I can't remember for sure, but I'm pretty sure UAL didn't buy any RJ's. UAX carriers were responsible for purchase/lease agreements. In the 90's it created a round and round with some of the then all turboprop carriers. Something like this;

UAL: hey express carrier, we'd like you fly regional feed for us
Express carrier: we don't have the planes to do it.
UAL: you'll have to get some more planes and we can't commit to any agreement till you have the planes to do it
Express: we can't really buy/lease planes unless we know for sure that we're getting a check.

That's how it went for 1 of the then 3 UAX carriers at the time. AWAC may have been different due the on again off again/make up-break up-make up-break up style of dysfunctional relationship they had

The best UAL ever got on a concession round was the pref-hiring at the UAX carriers, no DOH or seniority, etc.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 10:25 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 737F
Default

Originally Posted by xjtguy
I thought that derailed mentality was pretty much squelched in the 2006-7 time frame?

Seriously, is it a large enough demographic that it would ACTUALLY affect the SLI?



IIRC, TSA wasn't PFT, the others yes. Including BIZEX, JSI (now PSA), COMAIR, EpressOne, (PCL), CHQ. AWAC didn't have it, at least not in the mid 90's till it went away.
I stand corrected on TSA, thought they were PFT. Thanks for the other additions.
Reply
Old 03-11-2013 | 10:28 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: 737F
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
xjtguy, It's an issue because apparently some from that group seem to think that the day Flight Safety got them their job at Continental Express should be the same day they were "hired" at United Airlines. I don't think so!
Haven't heard that one at all. Relative +\- a few percent will be just fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cgull
United
3
12-20-2012 10:15 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
115
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
CAL EWR
Major
81
07-25-2007 05:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices