Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
CAL proposed SLI posted on UAL ALPA site >

CAL proposed SLI posted on UAL ALPA site

Search
Notices

CAL proposed SLI posted on UAL ALPA site

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2013, 03:36 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster View Post
It's funny .. with the exception of a few lost souls, there's no CAL pilots in this thread. Almost like they're embarrassed by this POS proposed SLI.
Plenty of us here, watching ... I guess the SFO base thing about emotional distress wasn't just huff and bluff.
SEDPA is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:46 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA View Post
Plenty of us here, watching ... I guess the SFO base thing about emotional distress wasn't just huff and bluff.

To Mr Sed or any other visiting CAL pilots,

I was wondering if you could help me understand something about the CAL side. Seems a lot of 756 FOs earned $90,761 and a lot of 73 FOs earned $72,520. Does that look right and does that mean ALL those dudes never broke guarantee?

Thank-you from your future stick partner who is not emotionally distressed, but interested in understanding the cultural differences.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:49 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA View Post
Plenty of us here, watching ... I guess the SFO base thing about emotional distress wasn't just huff and bluff.
Most are probably ashamed of this work. Might want to pass on throwing stones at this juncture.
ChrisJT6 is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:53 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox View Post
To Mr Sed or any other visiting CAL pilots,

I was wondering if you could help me understand something about the CAL side. Seems a lot of 756 FOs earned $90,761 and a lot of 73 FOs earned $72,520. Does that look right and does that mean ALL those dudes never broke guarantee?

Thank-you from your future stick partner who is not emotionally distressed, but interested in understanding the cultural differences.
Most are below 12th year pay.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 04:32 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
Default Interesting discussion...

Interesting gripe session, however as a CAL guy, I've heard absolutely 0 mention from any UAL pilot comparing their current seniority percentage on the UAL list to the CAL merger committees list.

How about some perspective with regards to relative seniority?

Just curious how the UAL guys are positioned in this list in seniority percentage by comparison...
Zoomie is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 04:34 AM
  #116  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA View Post
Plenty of us here, watching ... I guess the SFO base thing about emotional distress wasn't just huff and bluff.
Lol! Yes, lots of us watching and amazed at the attitudes of supposed "mature professionals" on this board.
Mitch Rapp05 is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 04:45 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

I believe the UAL pilots will owe capt. Brucia and his team a debt of gratitude when this is all over. On the CAL proposed SLI, the bottom 2386 or 37% of the UAL list is stapled below the last premerger CAL pilot, Mr. Yost. A proposal so rediculous it will most likely be rejected out of hand.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 04:50 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster View Post
It's funny .. with the exception of a few lost souls, there's no CAL pilots in this thread. Almost like they're embarrassed by this POS proposed SLI.
Not the case at all, not embarrassed by our proposed list. I agree with it. Don't think furloughed guys and gals, should go ahead of active pilots etc....I think the UA proposal is very extreme, but they are only looking out for UA pilots only, not me or other CAL pilots, and I fully expect them next month to do their job on their YOUR behalf to push you ahead of us with as much facts and support as possible. i Fully expect the CAL Merger Committee and Katz to do their job and provide the strongest rebuttal to UAs ISL position.
Just think any going back and forth with folks on this forum, about a proceeding totally out of our hand, is fruitless although is its comical to read some of the post.

I've not talked nor flown with anyone, that is embarrassed by the CAL position.
Slammer is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 05:05 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Hello McFly anyone out there . . .


There are hundreds LWB (or whatever that category was) FOs that earned exactly $90,761. Can no one from CAL explain why this is. Same holds true for NB FOs with earnings of $72,520. Is this a holdback of data or does this represent some structural element of CAL bids and earnings related to min guarantee?


Anyone?
Sunvox is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 05:06 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie View Post
Interesting gripe session, however as a CAL guy, I've heard absolutely 0 mention from any UAL pilot comparing their current seniority percentage on the UAL list to the CAL merger committees list.

How about some perspective with regards to relative seniority?

Just curious how the UAL guys are positioned in this list in seniority percentage by comparison...
Please tell me where I can find relative seniority in alpa merger policy? Why even discuss a seniority list construct on policies that are not in effect?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coto Pilot
United
123
12-04-2012 06:47 PM
TruthHurts
United
48
04-04-2012 09:07 AM
Redeye Pilot
United
4
12-15-2010 05:57 AM
ATCsaidDoWhat
Union Talk
0
09-30-2010 11:49 AM
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices