And so it begins
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Because we've (UAL & CAL) always "bought" the RJs one way or the other. Either we bought the aircraft outright and leased it back to the regional, or we leased the aircraft ourselves and then sub-leased it, or we "co-signed" the lease agreements.
The regionals don't have the capital to buy RJs without a deal from the mothership. Nobody in the in their right mind will loan $$$ to a regional without a mainline deal in place.
The regionals don't have the capital to buy RJs without a deal from the mothership. Nobody in the in their right mind will loan $$$ to a regional without a mainline deal in place.
So I guess this is wrong? Or did I miss a deal with the "mothership" somewhere?
SkyWest Firms Order For 100 Mitsubishi Regional Jets
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
I carry my no vote with me. I printed it out... I know of a few others that did as well. Just for the day MGT. did this. It is only the beginning.
While it is far from scientific, most of the yes voters (but not all) were from LUAL. Most that I talked to were voting to get to the SLI.
While it is far from scientific, most of the yes voters (but not all) were from LUAL. Most that I talked to were voting to get to the SLI.
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
In reality, instead of pointing fingers at each others pilot group you should all collectively turn and stare in the direction of Atlanta. It all changed when they gave it the green light last summer.
And Moak too... you would think that with both negotiations occurring simultaneously, which a rare occurrence indeed, there would have been a little pow-wow held at the behest of Moak to strategize,discuss and execute a common scope plan so that neither company could claim to the NMB an unfair advantage. Imbeciles.
And Moak too... you would think that with both negotiations occurring simultaneously, which a rare occurrence indeed, there would have been a little pow-wow held at the behest of Moak to strategize,discuss and execute a common scope plan so that neither company could claim to the NMB an unfair advantage. Imbeciles.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Sunvox they don't get it. They aren't used to seeing anything larger than a 50 seat jet because when all you have are 737s you really don't need to feed them with anything bigger. So now they are in the "big boy league" and they see a bigger airplane feeding a global widebody airline, and they get all excited.
Of course they don't mention that their old contract allowed unlimited Q400 airplanes which can be configured up to 80 seats. At least we got that one removed....
Of course they don't mention that their old contract allowed unlimited Q400 airplanes which can be configured up to 80 seats. At least we got that one removed....
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
I carry my no vote with me. I printed it out... I know of a few others that did as well. Just for the day MGT. did this. It is only the beginning.
While it is far from scientific, most of the yes voters (but not all) were from LUAL. Most that I talked to were voting to get to the SLI.
While it is far from scientific, most of the yes voters (but not all) were from LUAL. Most that I talked to were voting to get to the SLI.
#46
The whole point of our scope clause was to improve on what Delta had. As per our conrtact the EMB-175 is a 76 seater and this order trips the company to the 153 plane limit which restricts the future growth of hulls in the express fleet to 255 total and the CRJ-900 has already been agreed upon as a 90 seat plane that we have to fly.
You do not have the facts straight. We are not Delta, and our scope is one step superior to theirs.

#47
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 709
Likes: 6
From: 320 Captain
The whole point of our scope clause was to improve on what Delta had. As per our conrtact the EMB-175 is a 76 seater and this order trips the company to the 153 plane limit which restricts the future growth of hulls in the express fleet to 255 total and the CRJ-900 has already been agreed upon as a 90 seat plane that we have to fly.
You do not have the facts straight. We are not Delta, and our scope is one step superior to theirs.


You do not have the facts straight. We are not Delta, and our scope is one step superior to theirs.


Just because we have a rate for the Crj900 does not mean we are the only one who can fly them. As you previously posted, the scope limits is:
“76-Seat Aircraft” means aircraft configured with more than seventy (70) passenger seats but no more than seventy-six (76) passenger seats, and certificated in the United States for ninety (90) or fewer passenger seats and with a maximum United States certificated gross takeoff weight of 86,000 or fewer pounds.
The Crj900 meets those criteria as long as its outfitted with only 76 seats max. It's MTOW is 84,500lbs.
And the scope choke won't begin to have an effect until such time as the company wants more then 153 of the large rj's. So only 123 orders to go.
In order to get more then the 153, to the 325 number (of 70 + seats) you posted they have to order a new small narrowbody for the mainline. The dwindling ratio, and eventual limit of 125 less then 70 seat airframes will only then begin to happen as well. So not something we will see in this current 4 year contract.
1-C-1-g Number of 76-Seat Aircraft
If the Company adds New Small Narrowbody aircraft to the Company Fleet, then on or after January 1, 2016, the number of permitted 76-Seat Aircraft may increase from 153 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 223 76-Seat Aircraft, and the number of permitted 76/70-Seat Aircraft may increase from 255 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 325 76/70-Seat Aircraft, except that once the number of 76/70-Seat Aircraft exceeds 255, then the number of 70-Seat Aircraft may not be more than 102. 76-Seat Aircraft (above 153 such Aircraft) may be added on a one 76-Seat Aircraft for each one and one quarter New Small Narrowbody Aircraft (1:1.25) ratio (rounded to the closest integer). In addition, in the event more than 153 76-Seat Aircraft are in United Express Flying, the Company shall remove from United Express Flying a number of 50-Seat Aircraft determined as follows:
If the Company adds New Small Narrowbody aircraft to the Company Fleet, then on or after January 1, 2016, the number of permitted 76-Seat Aircraft may increase from 153 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 223 76-Seat Aircraft, and the number of permitted 76/70-Seat Aircraft may increase from 255 (as permitted under Section 1-C-1-a-(2)-(c)) up to a total of 325 76/70-Seat Aircraft, except that once the number of 76/70-Seat Aircraft exceeds 255, then the number of 70-Seat Aircraft may not be more than 102. 76-Seat Aircraft (above 153 such Aircraft) may be added on a one 76-Seat Aircraft for each one and one quarter New Small Narrowbody Aircraft (1:1.25) ratio (rounded to the closest integer). In addition, in the event more than 153 76-Seat Aircraft are in United Express Flying, the Company shall remove from United Express Flying a number of 50-Seat Aircraft determined as follows:
a former student @ DXR
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
The whole point of our scope clause was to improve on what Delta had. As per our conrtact the EMB-175 is a 76 seater and this order trips the company to the 153 plane limit which restricts the future growth of hulls in the express fleet to 255 total and the CRJ-900 has already been agreed upon as a 90 seat plane that we have to fly.
You do not have the facts straight. We are not Delta, and our scope is one step superior to theirs.


You do not have the facts straight. We are not Delta, and our scope is one step superior to theirs.


What you are saying is either incorrect or you are misleading people reading here. The 255 limit is only to 70/76 seat airplanes. The only thing this trips is requirement for < 255 70 seaters (UAL scope had no limit on # 70 seat hulls, only block hour limits), which doesn't mean anything since the company already flew < 255 70 seaters.
Therefore, the company doesn't have to park even a single 50 seater. The company, if it chooses, can maintain all the 50 seaters it wants (these aren't included in the 255 count) as long as it maintains <121% express block hours to mainline NB hours.
They will still park 50 seaters, but that is because they are POS that no longer make money in their current state. 50 seaters were not really the issue in this contract since the company doesn't want them and investors have stated this for the past 3-5 years. However, there are agreements with the regionals that have to be fulfilled and now they will be with 76 seaters.
The "scope choke" is a joke. The only way the "scope choke" works is if they decide to buy 76 seater #154.
At the end of the day, the company will eventually have 153 76 seat aircraft, reduce the 70 seat aircraft to 102 70 seaters and reduce the 50 seat fleet to whatever they need to feed some places.
The company will never buy 76 seater #154, and thus the scope choke clauses will never kick in reducing express Block hours.
As for the Q400s, true CAL scope allowed an unlimited # of these airplanes, but people didn't book on them and they are slow and have high maintenance issues. If the company wanted more Q400s, they would have bought more of them and used them well before any merger occurred.
UAL will wait until next contract and ask for more 76 seaters in exchange for another pay raise.
#49
As of April 25, 2013, the Company’s fleet plan was as follows:
Mainline Aircraft in Scheduled Service
YE 2012 1Q Δ 2Q Δ 3Q Δ 4Q Δ YE2013 FY Δ
B747-400 23 - - - - 23 -
B777-200 74 - - - - 74 -
B787-8 5 1 - - 2 8 3
B767-200/300/400 56 - (5) - - 51 (5)
B757-200/300 154 (2) (2) (7) (13) 130 (24)
B737-500/700/800/900 238 2 - 6 6 252 14
A319/A320 152 - - - - 152 -
Total Mainline Aircraft 702 1 (7) (1) (5) 690 (12)
Regional Aircraft in Scheduled Service
YE 2012 1Q Δ 2Q Δ 3Q Δ 4Q Δ YE2013 FY Δ
Q400 16 5 11 - - 32 16
Q300 5 - - - - 5 -
Q200 16 - - - - 16 -
ERJ-145 270 - 4 3 - 277 7
ERJ-135 7 2 - (2) - 7 -
CRJ200 75 - 1 (1) - 75 -
CRJ700 115 - - - - 115 -
EMB 120 9 - - - - 9 -
EMB 170 38 - - - - 38 -
Total Regional Aircraft 551 7 16 - - 574 23
Sorry about the poor cut/paste job but this is from the UNICAL holdings UAL fleet plan as of April 2013.
See it for yourself
United Continental Holdings, Inc. - Investor Relations - Fleet Information
The parentheses indicate a loss.
-12 at mainline
+23 at express
Guess we can add another 30 to that 23.
Way to go Yessirs!!!
Mainline Aircraft in Scheduled Service
YE 2012 1Q Δ 2Q Δ 3Q Δ 4Q Δ YE2013 FY Δ
B747-400 23 - - - - 23 -
B777-200 74 - - - - 74 -
B787-8 5 1 - - 2 8 3
B767-200/300/400 56 - (5) - - 51 (5)
B757-200/300 154 (2) (2) (7) (13) 130 (24)
B737-500/700/800/900 238 2 - 6 6 252 14
A319/A320 152 - - - - 152 -
Total Mainline Aircraft 702 1 (7) (1) (5) 690 (12)
Regional Aircraft in Scheduled Service
YE 2012 1Q Δ 2Q Δ 3Q Δ 4Q Δ YE2013 FY Δ
Q400 16 5 11 - - 32 16
Q300 5 - - - - 5 -
Q200 16 - - - - 16 -
ERJ-145 270 - 4 3 - 277 7
ERJ-135 7 2 - (2) - 7 -
CRJ200 75 - 1 (1) - 75 -
CRJ700 115 - - - - 115 -
EMB 120 9 - - - - 9 -
EMB 170 38 - - - - 38 -
Total Regional Aircraft 551 7 16 - - 574 23
Sorry about the poor cut/paste job but this is from the UNICAL holdings UAL fleet plan as of April 2013.
See it for yourself
United Continental Holdings, Inc. - Investor Relations - Fleet Information
The parentheses indicate a loss.
-12 at mainline
+23 at express
Guess we can add another 30 to that 23.

Way to go Yessirs!!!
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
I dug up an explanation of the "Scope Choke"
The JCBA Scope Story*
By First Officer K.C. Mueller
UAL-MEC Domestic Code Share Chairman, Scope SME
*
Delta Scope or a Scope Choke?** Late in the summer of 2012 it became clear the United Pilots were going to have to emulate “Delta Scope” in the JCBA. (223 76-seat jets, 102 70-seat jets [325 big 223+102] and 125 50-seat jets) for a RJ fleet total of 450. 325 big (70/76) and 125 small (50). Included in “Delta Scope” was a substantial and permanent shift in flying from the Express to the Mainline via language, plus a new small Mainline aircraft type.* Added together, “Delta Scope was truly impressive and delivered all the goals held dear by Delta Pilots”; shrinking Express and growing Mainline under a new CBA that, when it becomes amendable, will leave the Delta Pilots in a position of strength regarding Express for the next CBA cycle. But while Delta Scope answered almost all the pattern bargained deficiencies of the last 20 years, your Scope SME’s saw one soft spot. The B717 airframe was already almost 15 years old. There was one issue still left to resolve before this struggle was over: The “gap-in-gauge” @ 100 seats.
*
Strategically, this RJ War was always going to 100 seats and it won’t be over until we have that fight* –* no doubt about it. That fight wasn’t quite over at DAL. If we could capture all the best of Delta plus fix that issue, we would have ended forever the growth potential of UAX and the ability of UAX to threaten the Mainline. While much can be said of the tortured path all network pilot groups have traveled seeking to balance jobs and marketing realities surrounding the RJ the opportunity to reflect and relax will never arrive until the 100 seat jet is safely in the hands of Mainline Pilots and the War is over.
*
That was the set-up when we began negotiating “Delta scope” in the summer of 2012.
*
This challenge was coupled with another. At United there were no 76 seat RJ’s. Delta started C2012 with 120, and all the improvements and protections for the Delta Pilots didn’t start until 154 76 seat jets were on the property.* How do we get from zero 76 seat jets to all that Delta agreed to while also achieving what the United Pilots deserved at the outset, namely the security that transfer of flying from UAL to UAX was inverted by the JCBA?* The company was willing to agree to the “Delta” end state: 450 hulls, 325 big ( 223/102 ) and 125 small, the seat and weight limits, the shift in flying, the no-furlough clause, the mileage restriction, the retirement of the 50 seaters, but there was no clear path to the 154th 76 seat jet. After that the Delta language could be copied perfectly. But we were on our own from 0 to 154.*
*
It is because of this the Section 1-C-1 language in the JCBA is so complex and difficult to understand. We had to invent language that would get United pilots from 0-154 76 seat jets while also getting United pilots what they deserve ( shrinking UAX ) and then overlay that language on top of the Delta language. We have two scenarios, if you will, built into our UAX language (Section 1-C-1) and the Company will ultimately decide which path we travel. What’s Important for the United Pilots to understand is…. both paths accomplish almost the same thing.* The Company will either deliver “Delta Scope” in its complete form or fall into a UAX “Scope Choke”.
*
Since “Delta Scope” is well understood and its value to Pilots very straight forward, let’s examine the language crafted that results in the “Scope Choke”; our nickname for the event that occurs should the Company attempt to deny United Pilots the “New Narrow-body” by never flying more than 153 76-seat jets.* On Jan 1, 2014, the Company obtains the right to fly 130 76-seat RJ’s inside a new limit of 255 UAX aircraft of 51-76 seats.* Currently, United flies approximately 190 aircraft that meet that definition, and they have no limit. 255 – 190 = 65. Without the “New Narrow-body” being delivered to United Pilots the limit of 255 will apply for the life of the JCBA. In just over 3 years the Company has scheduled over 150 50-seat RJ retirements simply for economic reasons. The 50-seat RJ clearly represents the “fleet of the past” while the new restriction is placed on the “fleet of the future”, aircraft of 51-76 seats. Moving forward from Jan 1, 2014, while the “fleet of the past” is dying the “fleet of the future” is severely restricted.* Did the Company get 130 76 seat RJ’s? Not really.* 255 – 190 = 65. The Company will get 65 76 seat RJ’s if they don’t get any more Q400’s or 70 seat RJ’s but after the 65th hull they are merely exchanging a 70 seat hull for a 76 seat one. That is 6 seats net, for each 76 seat RJ after the 65th. Not the target, but collateral damage we should score.
*
Besides that, regardless of how the Company allocates its 255 hulls within our new restrictions the 50-seat RJ fleet is dying. With that and no other action by the Company UAX is eventually headed to a new maximum RJ fleet of 255. Contrast that with today’s UAX RJ fleet of over 500. If the Company Mainline fleet does not grow at all over the next 6 years the UAX fleet will still shrink by almost 40% just through 50-seat RJ retirements. Even without the language forcing flying from Express to Mainline being triggered (same as Delta, not effective until 154 76-seat RJ’s) we are forcing flying from UAX to the Mainline or out the door to a competitor.* Without all of “Delta Scope”, being copied by the Company the UAX fleet will soon simply be too small for the Company’s marketing needs.* Once this “Scope Choke” hits the Company has only one way out: Use the language within the JCBA to grow the 76-seat RJ fleet further, the step we anticipated the Company might not want to do.
*
That brings the 154th 76-seat jet, which brings our “New Narrow-body” the rest of 1-C-1-f and -g, and the capstone to the whole strategy.* On that day, United’s Pilots will have won the RJ war - our ultimate goal.* After two decades of struggle for the dividing line between “Express” and “Mainline” we will have found victory at almost the same place the fight started. The original seat limit United Pilots imposed on UAX in 1991 ….. 75 Seats (Feeder Scope Mod, 1991).
*
The UAX language within the JCBA, regardless of which path is chosen by the Company (replicating “Delta Scope” or trying to avoid it - the “Scope Choke”), insures UAX shrinks.* We ( Scope SME’s ) actually predict that before the Company will buy the “New Narrow-body “ they will try one last time to avoid it by … ASKING YOU TO SELL IT BACK TO THEM. When is the last time the Company asked you to modify your Express Scope for them?*
*
The UAX piece of the JCBA improves the pattern in pattern bargaining and either improves on Delta Scope or crushes UAX. This was our goal; develop language that recreates and compels the Company to replicate the Delta Express Fleet in case they have second thoughts. Either way, with this JCBA the balance of power and flying returns to our Pilots.* Then, with the 100 seat jet in our hands, we cement it there.
The JCBA Scope Story*
By First Officer K.C. Mueller
UAL-MEC Domestic Code Share Chairman, Scope SME
*
Delta Scope or a Scope Choke?** Late in the summer of 2012 it became clear the United Pilots were going to have to emulate “Delta Scope” in the JCBA. (223 76-seat jets, 102 70-seat jets [325 big 223+102] and 125 50-seat jets) for a RJ fleet total of 450. 325 big (70/76) and 125 small (50). Included in “Delta Scope” was a substantial and permanent shift in flying from the Express to the Mainline via language, plus a new small Mainline aircraft type.* Added together, “Delta Scope was truly impressive and delivered all the goals held dear by Delta Pilots”; shrinking Express and growing Mainline under a new CBA that, when it becomes amendable, will leave the Delta Pilots in a position of strength regarding Express for the next CBA cycle. But while Delta Scope answered almost all the pattern bargained deficiencies of the last 20 years, your Scope SME’s saw one soft spot. The B717 airframe was already almost 15 years old. There was one issue still left to resolve before this struggle was over: The “gap-in-gauge” @ 100 seats.
*
Strategically, this RJ War was always going to 100 seats and it won’t be over until we have that fight* –* no doubt about it. That fight wasn’t quite over at DAL. If we could capture all the best of Delta plus fix that issue, we would have ended forever the growth potential of UAX and the ability of UAX to threaten the Mainline. While much can be said of the tortured path all network pilot groups have traveled seeking to balance jobs and marketing realities surrounding the RJ the opportunity to reflect and relax will never arrive until the 100 seat jet is safely in the hands of Mainline Pilots and the War is over.
*
That was the set-up when we began negotiating “Delta scope” in the summer of 2012.
*
This challenge was coupled with another. At United there were no 76 seat RJ’s. Delta started C2012 with 120, and all the improvements and protections for the Delta Pilots didn’t start until 154 76 seat jets were on the property.* How do we get from zero 76 seat jets to all that Delta agreed to while also achieving what the United Pilots deserved at the outset, namely the security that transfer of flying from UAL to UAX was inverted by the JCBA?* The company was willing to agree to the “Delta” end state: 450 hulls, 325 big ( 223/102 ) and 125 small, the seat and weight limits, the shift in flying, the no-furlough clause, the mileage restriction, the retirement of the 50 seaters, but there was no clear path to the 154th 76 seat jet. After that the Delta language could be copied perfectly. But we were on our own from 0 to 154.*
*
It is because of this the Section 1-C-1 language in the JCBA is so complex and difficult to understand. We had to invent language that would get United pilots from 0-154 76 seat jets while also getting United pilots what they deserve ( shrinking UAX ) and then overlay that language on top of the Delta language. We have two scenarios, if you will, built into our UAX language (Section 1-C-1) and the Company will ultimately decide which path we travel. What’s Important for the United Pilots to understand is…. both paths accomplish almost the same thing.* The Company will either deliver “Delta Scope” in its complete form or fall into a UAX “Scope Choke”.
*
Since “Delta Scope” is well understood and its value to Pilots very straight forward, let’s examine the language crafted that results in the “Scope Choke”; our nickname for the event that occurs should the Company attempt to deny United Pilots the “New Narrow-body” by never flying more than 153 76-seat jets.* On Jan 1, 2014, the Company obtains the right to fly 130 76-seat RJ’s inside a new limit of 255 UAX aircraft of 51-76 seats.* Currently, United flies approximately 190 aircraft that meet that definition, and they have no limit. 255 – 190 = 65. Without the “New Narrow-body” being delivered to United Pilots the limit of 255 will apply for the life of the JCBA. In just over 3 years the Company has scheduled over 150 50-seat RJ retirements simply for economic reasons. The 50-seat RJ clearly represents the “fleet of the past” while the new restriction is placed on the “fleet of the future”, aircraft of 51-76 seats. Moving forward from Jan 1, 2014, while the “fleet of the past” is dying the “fleet of the future” is severely restricted.* Did the Company get 130 76 seat RJ’s? Not really.* 255 – 190 = 65. The Company will get 65 76 seat RJ’s if they don’t get any more Q400’s or 70 seat RJ’s but after the 65th hull they are merely exchanging a 70 seat hull for a 76 seat one. That is 6 seats net, for each 76 seat RJ after the 65th. Not the target, but collateral damage we should score.
*
Besides that, regardless of how the Company allocates its 255 hulls within our new restrictions the 50-seat RJ fleet is dying. With that and no other action by the Company UAX is eventually headed to a new maximum RJ fleet of 255. Contrast that with today’s UAX RJ fleet of over 500. If the Company Mainline fleet does not grow at all over the next 6 years the UAX fleet will still shrink by almost 40% just through 50-seat RJ retirements. Even without the language forcing flying from Express to Mainline being triggered (same as Delta, not effective until 154 76-seat RJ’s) we are forcing flying from UAX to the Mainline or out the door to a competitor.* Without all of “Delta Scope”, being copied by the Company the UAX fleet will soon simply be too small for the Company’s marketing needs.* Once this “Scope Choke” hits the Company has only one way out: Use the language within the JCBA to grow the 76-seat RJ fleet further, the step we anticipated the Company might not want to do.
*
That brings the 154th 76-seat jet, which brings our “New Narrow-body” the rest of 1-C-1-f and -g, and the capstone to the whole strategy.* On that day, United’s Pilots will have won the RJ war - our ultimate goal.* After two decades of struggle for the dividing line between “Express” and “Mainline” we will have found victory at almost the same place the fight started. The original seat limit United Pilots imposed on UAX in 1991 ….. 75 Seats (Feeder Scope Mod, 1991).
*
The UAX language within the JCBA, regardless of which path is chosen by the Company (replicating “Delta Scope” or trying to avoid it - the “Scope Choke”), insures UAX shrinks.* We ( Scope SME’s ) actually predict that before the Company will buy the “New Narrow-body “ they will try one last time to avoid it by … ASKING YOU TO SELL IT BACK TO THEM. When is the last time the Company asked you to modify your Express Scope for them?*
*
The UAX piece of the JCBA improves the pattern in pattern bargaining and either improves on Delta Scope or crushes UAX. This was our goal; develop language that recreates and compels the Company to replicate the Delta Express Fleet in case they have second thoughts. Either way, with this JCBA the balance of power and flying returns to our Pilots.* Then, with the 100 seat jet in our hands, we cement it there.


