Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
The fat lady is singing... >

The fat lady is singing...

Search
Notices

The fat lady is singing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2013, 08:18 PM
  #21  
7.27%
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Boeing
Posts: 543
Default

Originally Posted by Maxepr1 View Post
Yeah those 74s rate right up there with all of Emirates equipment.....What's the age difference between the two fleets Lee?
Since when has the 74 been know as a "guppie?"
Palmtree Pilot is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 09:57 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

The age of a plane these days means almost nothing. It all depends on how much you spend on MX and the interiors. Since Glenn was only in it for his bonus money, of course our planes look crappy. Everyone on the CO side is forgetting, it's only money- and how it looks can have very little to do with how it performs. Any plane can look or perform like any other, again it's only money. And the bean counters determine the point where investing in old equipment gets more expensive than a new plane.

Put a new interior and paint on the outside, the worst plane in the world wouldn't matter to the pax. What we need is MX and interiors. That is where Delta is killing us. An old maintained plane can cost a lot less than payments on a new plane.

Once the Max and NEO's are out, you will see current generation planes retiring in droves even 737-700,800 & 900's, fuel costs are the exception to the above. Current generation 737's are not that much better fuel wise than our old 737-300's. The Max will change all that.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 05:28 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
The age of a plane these days means almost nothing. It all depends on how much you spend on MX and the interiors. Since Glenn was only in it for his bonus money, of course our planes look crappy. Everyone on the CO side is forgetting, it's only money- and how it looks can have very little to do with how it performs. Any plane can look or perform like any other, again it's only money. And the bean counters determine the point where investing in old equipment gets more expensive than a new plane.

Put a new interior and paint on the outside, the worst plane in the world wouldn't matter to the pax. What we need is MX and interiors. That is where Delta is killing us. An old maintained plane can cost a lot less than payments on a new plane.

Once the Max and NEO's are out, you will see current generation planes retiring in droves even 737-700,800 & 900's, fuel costs are the exception to the above. Current generation 737's are not that much better fuel wise than our old 737-300's. The Max will change all that.
Dave, not only does the 400 look crappy but they spent so little on mx that it had a base closed, ord. It was cx all the time to nrt and hkg, cx or delay. So it hurt much more than just the look.
syd111 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 06:21 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by LeeMat View Post
Last week I had TWO sCAL guys on my jumpseats. Boy were they happy to be going home...Last flight out of town on my CRAPPY 756 with two jumpseats. I don't think those two guys really cared how CRAPPY the jet was. Welcome on my CRAPPY jet any time...The more the merrier
Unless your name and pretty picture appears in my yearbook, then we have a problem!
So how many have you "tossed" off over the years Lee? I assume you also have the master list.
syd111 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 06:39 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: next to chronic complainers...
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot View Post
Ever notice how CAL pilots know exactly how old our 747s are but can't remember the date they were hired?
The oldest ones are B747-422 N171UA delivered on 30-06-1989
one of the youngest ones B747-422 N128UA delivered on 12-05-2000
jetlink is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 06:41 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr View Post
That's the big question. As we know, in the US a good share of the international traffic does not originate in the hubs but is instead fed by the spokes.

At JFK we are witnessing JetBlue transforming itself into the narrowbody version of Skywest and feeding multiple international "partners."

Who will fill that role for Emirates elsewhere?
Delta Connection...oh sorry, Alaska.
Rabid Seagull is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 07:46 AM
  #27  
SLI best wishes!
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
Default

Originally Posted by syd111 View Post
So how many have you "tossed" off over the years Lee? I assume you also have the master list.
I had to write up the jump seat seatbelt harness last minute before pushback a few times. Too bad for the guy, maintenance always comes back with a no time to fix deferral. Bummer. Does that answer your question?
LeeMat is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 07:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by LeeMat View Post
I had to write up the jump seat seatbelt harness last minute before pushback a few times. Too bad for the guy, maintenance always comes back with a no time to fix deferral. Bummer. Does that answer your question?
Yes it does I guess you worked around it instead of just sending him packing.
syd111 is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 09:04 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by syd111 View Post
Dave, not only does the 400 look crappy but they spent so little on mx that it had a base closed, ord. It was cx all the time to nrt and hkg, cx or delay. So it hurt much more than just the look.
Agreed. Need to spend money on all the planes. It will take a lot to catch up with Delta. New planes are a start. Money for MX also goes that direction. I think the move of the 747 is a good one. I don't know if the 350 will be the answer or not.

747-8's and 777X's might be a better choice.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 06-08-2013, 11:37 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gofastmopar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: B756 Capt Junior Lineholder
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
Agreed. Need to spend money on all the planes. It will take a lot to catch up with Delta. New planes are a start. Money for MX also goes that direction. I think the move of the 747 is a good one. I don't know if the 350 will be the answer or not.

747-8's and 777X's might be a better choice.
My wet dream is 747-8I's coming on board... I've been told the GE engines are interchangeable with the ones on the 787....?
gofastmopar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
75
05-15-2012 06:41 PM
jackace
SkyWest
66
03-21-2012 04:15 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
10-12-2010 04:46 AM
CE750
Major
29
04-17-2010 08:18 PM
CVG767A
Mergers and Acquisitions
276
03-21-2008 11:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices