![]() |
Originally Posted by NWARet
(Post 1438046)
89 hours per month?
I thought they had guys furloughed. |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1438461)
SPANKED! Tough UAL rEAL rhetoric fails to match reality. Not suprising based on what furloughed and junior buds have told me. Can't wait for hypocrites like you to teach me how to stand up to management. :rolleyes:
another post, I thought the alpa position of high time not affecting staffing total BS. |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1438362)
What? you don't like your new contract? well tough sheet. Just wait about a month. I will be dancing in Houston Ops, celebrating my huge WINDFALL. ;) I'll be the guy with the FU t-shirt.
Sled |
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1438383)
Those guys will still have the opportunity to help out the company when they've screwed up the staffing and want pilots to fix it.
The rest of us will enjoy the nice union rules. |
Originally Posted by Moombabeach
(Post 1437841)
Enjoy the raise in hourly pay you got from your chapter 11 contract, and the new metal that will be arriving to fly, compliments of us CAL types. Your benefiting from a joint contract that YOUR mec approved. Wake up dude.
... United Airlines to ask Embraer to bid on planes BRUSSELS | Wed Dec 9, 2009 12:40pm EST Dec 9 (Reuters) - Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer (EMBR3.SA)(ERJ.N) will be invited to join a tender to supply narrow-bodied planes to United Airlines, the head of United's parent company UAL Corp UAUA.O said on Wednesday. "We are going to go into the narrow-bodied (plane) market next year. We are going to invite Embraer into that competition," UAL Chief Executive Glenn Tilton said in an interview. ... But I sure do enjoy the eye opening CAL maintenance. Thanks |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1438461)
SPANKED! Tough UAL rEAL rhetoric fails to match reality. Not suprising based on what furloughed and junior buds have told me. Can't wait for hypocrites like you to teach me how to stand up to management. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by NWARet
(Post 1438481)
Hardly a hypocrite. My coment was about a ual guy complaining about not getting his 89 hrs. I never flew high when we had guys out, and referencing
another post, I thought the alpa position of high time not affecting staffing total BS. |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1438509)
Riddle me this. If everyone bids only min hours, what happens? The only way to force min hours is for management and the union to agree. Which is cheaper for management?
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1438520)
Well if a CAL 67 Capt complained to me about not consistently crediting 89 hrs/month while people were furloughed, I would tell him/her that he/she is a greedy *insert explicitive*. Apparently you find this person's actions completely defensible. Can't wait for guys like you to teach me how to be a real union pilot...:rolleyes:
I'm neither accusing, defending, nor characterizing anyone's actions. You however, are eager to jump to conclusions about me when I asked a simple question. |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1438521)
How would you force everyone to fly 75 hours?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands