Yeah just report the FO and get him fired - major FAIL.

Nice. You guys ever hear of Pro Standards? Or is running to the CP your preferred course of action?

Just rolling a grenade under the door. And an impersonal one at that.

Why would a pilot that could barely hold reserve on a 319 in 2010 take issue with being an FO for a captain who was a senior line holder on the 737 in 2010?

No, we really do not have pro stands. In case you missed it we were force fed scab mentality by Jay Pierce who is our unquestioned Supreme Overlord. The only way we have hope is through reeducation courtesy of UAL union fighters that clearly defeated all attacks from management this last decade...

Senior lineholder in 2010?

Junior DOH holding a Captain bid at CAL on 9/17/2010.
IAH 787 CAP 6/84
777 CAP 10/84
756 CAP 5/90
737 CAP 11/98

EWR 777 CAP 3/86
756 CAP 10/95
737 CAP 8/98

CLE 737 CAP 7/98
GUM 737 CAP 5/05

Bring on da list!

Sorry. That was a typo on my part. I meant to say that the cal 2005 pilot was a senior FO in 2010. Why should he be junior to a 1998 ual pilot that can barely hold reserve in 2010?

James,

Wasn't there a pilot on here recently stating that if you didn't gladly cater to his requests, he'd see to it that you would be looking at the models in the Chief Pilot's office? Motivation on the basis if fear provides for unintended consequences for those who utilize that method.

The 1998 pilot has far more longevity. More than twice as much.

That's why merger policy was changed.

That's why he will be senior.

So why were 05 Cal hires merged with Ual 98 hires on the UAL proposal?

You seriously think they will move down from the original UAL proposal? Which would mean the ARBS improved the UAL proposal for the UAL side, and completely ignored every facet of the CAL merger committee's presentations. I'll give you one thing...you are one seriously optimistic person. Good luck with that.