Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
LAX -400 Rumors of Changes >

LAX -400 Rumors of Changes

Search

Notices

LAX -400 Rumors of Changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2013 | 12:58 PM
  #31  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Flyguppy
Yes, but they are planning on this LAX/SFO-SYD flying to be done by L-UAL aircraft.

It's listed as "777 - 3 class" in the list, hence L-UAL 777B's. They will have the same issue as the ORD-HKG flights.
Rut Row....

Stand by for the next PR disaster....They'll be leaving people and cargo on the dock. They really should know better after the AKL debacle.
Reply
Old 08-16-2013 | 08:27 PM
  #32  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Airhoss;
You have been at UAL long enough. Have you ever seen UAL learn from past mistakes?
I would predict another low cost "airline within an airline" announcement soon. Or some other debacle we have seen 2 or 3 times in the last 15-20 years.

They appear to be incapable of learning from mistakes.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 02:37 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

In 2011 I was on a four hour sit and was sifting around the company website and hit the webpage that lists the top Officers of United Airlines. Out of 27 only 7 were former United. So I'm unsure who the "they" is you refer to but it's not former United management. Not that they were any good, or old Continental was bad.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 05:17 AM
  #34  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog
In 2011 I was on a four hour sit and was sifting around the company website and hit the webpage that lists the top Officers of United Airlines. Out of 27 only 7 were former United. So I'm unsure who the "they" is you refer to but it's not former United management. Not that they were any good, or old Continental was bad.
Good now the new "they" can make the same mistakes as the old "they". And a whole batch of new ones like 757-200's trans Atlantic and the little 777 LAX SYD. It really isn't rocket science.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:07 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: A320/A319/B737 Sys Acft Maint Controller
Default -400 to Syd

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
What?!?!? You are seriously suggesting flying nonstop with full pax and full cargo at the same time and with a smaller per-seat fuel burn?

That's crazy talk to the folks inside Willis Tower.

(You know, the ones that took the 400 out of ORD and thought a 757 was a fine aircraft for CDG-IAD.)
Many of those doing the planning for the -400 at ORD don't have the foggiest notion of what's happening. For One? The Hangar and Ramp area at ORD are about to become a NEW Runway!! so the facilities to maintain the -400 will be impaired severely and ORD might become not much more than a Very large terminal operation as the new facilities have not yet started going up on the south side of ORD. Much of the expertise AND MOST OF THE resources to maintain the -400 are on the west coast and aren't coming back east anytime soon.
I can't speak to the Pilot base as I don't know but there's a LOT of consternation at Willis because some would like to retire the -400 and some would like to keep it, as of NOW? The A350-1000 will be 4 years out with no real guarantee that it will meet the present mission OF the -400. And there are NO alternatives immediately to be had on the marketplace.. to be short? We're in a Pickle!! what are the Alternatives?? the 747-8i, the A380-800 or the 777-300ER/LR of which NONE can be had in the short term. So I guess we fly the 777's we already have?? or we mix the 777 and 747 missions.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:48 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

Yes the old CAL management in charge of the New United Airlines knows exactly how to run International Operations??? Will the house of cards fail before we get real airline people in place to fix it and succeed?

I don't care if you're UAL or CAL start saving a little for hard times ahead.

Last edited by Carolsdanger; 08-17-2013 at 08:03 AM.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:35 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: 73 CA EWR
Default

Originally Posted by Carolsdanger
Yes the old CAL management in charge of the New United Airlines knows exactly how to run International Operations??? Will the house of cards fail before we get real airline people in place to fix it and succeed?

I don't care if you're UAL or CAL start saving a little for hard times ahead.
Yes once again CAL management has to clean up a UAL mess.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:54 AM
  #38  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Well I started this thread with no real knowledge of the closing of LAX and essentially moving it to ORD, but it seemed logical.

The truth is UAL -400 are nearing the end of their useful life and UAL mgmt gambled on not needing a replacement airplane for another 4+ years. So here they are moving metal around to fill the holes.

Oh and for some reason no one seems to remember sCAL mgmt had planned on using the 787 from IAH - AKL, but lo and behold Boeing over promised and under delivered with the more capable next gen version of the 787 years away. What a pickle UAL has grown into.

I'm sure people are happier flying "guppies" to DSM and OMA anyway. ;(
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:58 AM
  #39  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
Yes once again CAL management has to clean up a UAL mess.
Weird.

For example, the 747-400 didn't have the extreme "reliability" problem in ORD until after the new post-merger management team found an ingenious way to save $$$ by not duplicating the stocked spare parts in ORD with the ones in SFO.

Just imagine the savings!

(The problem was any pre-depatrure MX delay in ORD could cause the FAs to go illegal without sufficient international FA RSVs to cover an entire crew---which is itself yet another example of the imaginary savings providing by tight staffing.)

Last edited by cadetdrivr; 08-17-2013 at 09:11 AM.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 09:22 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
Yes once again CAL management has to clean up a UAL mess.

UAL international operations was a well oiled machine. But hey, the new United managements wisdom is to put the "smallest equipment" that can complete the operation with JUST ONE fuel stop.

Meantime we send our PREMIUM INTERNATIONAL PASSENGERS running to Delta and American. Remember the 757 fiasco with flights over the North Atlantic? We sent premium passengers to other carriers to avoid the fuel stop to make connections. Guess who those guys book travel on now - not United.

You can defend them all you want but START SAVING. It can't last very long until it breaks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpreadEagle
SkyWest
24
04-13-2013 08:12 AM
grant123
Cargo
9
01-30-2011 09:20 AM
Cooperd0g
Major
30
09-02-2008 09:35 PM
dvhighdrive88
Major
6
04-03-2008 11:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices