Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
LAX -400 Rumors of Changes >

LAX -400 Rumors of Changes

Search

Notices

LAX -400 Rumors of Changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2016 | 03:49 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
or just call all 767 variants "seven six seven" and all 737 variants "guppy"
cracks me up listening to guys talk about their "nine hundred max nex gen" and then they go hop in a 1960s guppy
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 04:31 PM
  #72  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
It's still a POS guppy lol. Lipstick on a 60's pig. But hey it pays the bills.
Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 04:55 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
Long history at UAL calling it the "37". Goes back to the 60ies as we operated the 720, and the 727. You could not say you were on the 72 and have it make any sense.

Chairman
Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 05:02 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
...While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.







sorry, slow night.
Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 08:04 PM
  #75  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Wow someone revived a 3 year old thread to slam the writer? Stranger things have happened on the web.

For UAL pilots there was a day when we had the "rope start" and the "400" on the property. Both are variants of the "whale" and represented the biggest airplanes.

At the bottom end we had the "guppy," which came in two variants, "thunder" and "yuppie" (with some of the late sixties pilots calling it "fat Albert" before the Blue Angels named their C-130 that).

Oh and I forgot to mention the "standard," "stretch" and "advanced" versions of the "three holer."

Must be a "millennial" who complained about the precision of a "boomer" while ignoring completely the "X."

Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle.

Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 08:19 PM
  #76  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle.

We did love it at Delta, but not quite as much as the L-1011 TriStar, so the 767 handle was "Bi-Star".
Reply
Old 09-28-2016 | 09:41 PM
  #77  
Lambourne's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: B777 Capt
Default

There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.

It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
Reply
Old 09-29-2016 | 01:12 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.

It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
That sheds some light on things to this LCAL guy. I'm flying with a LUAL captain now and we are having a great time on the 73, thirty-seven, Super Guppy, whatever.
Reply
Old 09-29-2016 | 03:21 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Deafguppy
That sheds some light on things to this LCAL guy. I'm flying with a LUAL captain now and we are having a great time on the 73, thirty-seven, Super Guppy, whatever.
This ^^^. In the end, having fun is all that matters.
Reply
Old 09-29-2016 | 06:17 AM
  #80  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Jeff is one of the equities CAL brought to the merger. I wonder why they didn't bring that up during the ISL hearings?

How much of a negative adjustment gets to be made for forcing him on us?
What a dick!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpreadEagle
SkyWest
24
04-13-2013 08:12 AM
grant123
Cargo
9
01-30-2011 09:20 AM
Cooperd0g
Major
30
09-02-2008 09:35 PM
dvhighdrive88
Major
6
04-03-2008 11:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices