Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Pre-post ISL percentages >

Pre-post ISL percentages

Search
Notices

Pre-post ISL percentages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2013, 08:09 PM
  #101  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 768
Default

Originally Posted by bottoms up View Post
I can sum it up just like the isl award from your view point. If you ask for too much (cal) you will get burnt. If you ask for what you perceive is fair (UAL) you will get burnt. In the end the arbitrator (pbs) will give you what it wants and not based on seniority, longevity, or unicorns.

That's it in a nutshell. Great system. Company loves it.
Why, specifically, does the Company love it?

Is it the equivalent of "Continental Blend" vs. Starbucks?
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 09-06-2013, 09:21 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Don't lump us all in Sunvox. Everybody needs to try in stand in the other mans shoes. Perspective is a powerful tool. I've been talking to a few CAL folks that aren't upset about the award. Unity has to be the solution for our future.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 09-06-2013, 09:50 PM
  #103  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox View Post
Seriously, this is the problem. How can you say this with a straight face? When did these two events occur? They occurred post merger at a time when the merged companies were operating as one.
Joe,

No need to argue this. We already settled this with the arbitrators who decided you were right. I even think I saw your name in the decision.

You'll NEVER stop hearing their tale of woe.

Go have some beers mang.

LAX
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 09-06-2013, 09:51 PM
  #104  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
As we move forward with all of this activity, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of using CCS.
I try every day.....

I really wish it would work for me, OTHER than looking at the messages.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 04:17 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot View Post
I try every day.....

I really wish it would work for me, OTHER than looking at the messages.
Please tell me exactly how a non-merged L-UAL was going to add 500+ jobs in 2010 to 2012 ... Exactly how was that going to happen. Don't confuse this simple question with your expectation to share the UCH growth at s-CAL ... that has already been determined by three supposedly neutrals.
SEDPA is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 05:14 AM
  #106  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 34
Default

SEDA: So the 500 jobs equates to a 10.8% growth at S-CAL. Thats amazing since there was no mandatory retirement. Any other airline that grew that much over the last two years? What enabled S-CAL to have such phenomenal growth?
Madmagpilot is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 05:15 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA View Post
Please tell me exactly how a non-merged L-UAL was going to add 500+ jobs in 2010 to 2012 ... Exactly how was that going to happen. Don't confuse this simple question with your expectation to share the UCH growth at s-CAL ... that has already been determined by three supposedly neutrals.
It just doesn't matter. You were a furloughed Cal pilot when this merger went down and now you're at the bottom of the tank. Deal with it. The time for talk is over. The arbs have rendered a fair and equitable list. It's done. Time to move on.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 05:39 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA View Post
Please tell me exactly how a non-merged L-UAL was going to add 500+ jobs in 2010 to 2012 ... Exactly how was that going to happen. Don't confuse this simple question with your expectation to share the UCH growth at s-CAL ... that has already been determined by three supposedly neutrals.

Please try to keep an open mind, I am not trying to put you down nor do I believe I am looking at this through my "United" glasses . . .

The fact is that in 2008 Delta and Northwest merged. Their new combined market share made them an incredible competitor, and not coincidentally that is exactly when Continental began losing money. In fact for the next 9 quarters following the merger of Delta and Northwest, Continental airlines lost money while at the same time United managed to continue earning money. Why was that? We can never know for certain, but what was clear and what your CEO testified to in front of congress was that neither United nor Continental were doing well and the best chance they had for competing successfully was merging.

The point that Lax, Axl, JohnHale, myself and most of the other United APC posters have been hoping to get across to the Continental pilots is NOT that United would have grown 10% without Continental, but that neither of us could possibly have grown 10% between 2010 and 2013 without the merger. We can argue 'til the cows come home about how things might have been, but the most important fact to remember is that WE grew together better than either of us could have done alone. If you believe in your heart of hearts that all the post merger growth at Continental would have come regardless of the merger than I am afraid we will all have a very long career together.

Your future is bright regardless of the ISL decision so what will holding a grudge against the United pilots gain you?
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 05:47 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox View Post
Seriously, this is the problem. How can you say this with a straight face? When did these two events occur? They occurred post merger at a time when the merged companies were operating as one. You nor I can never know how the individual companies would have fared alone because that wasn't reality and to claim that all the growth was coming regardless is simply false. I believe that you and other Continental pilots truly believe this line of thinking and THAT is the single biggest detriment to future unity. Consider this. Independent arbitrators who have worked integrations for decades and seen every argument in history determined that the future of Continental was just as cloudy as the future of United. They have ZERO incentive to prefer one group over another and if you genuinely understand the ALPA merger policy, it's history, and how it was applied in this case then you will see that the arbitrators were whollly independent in their thinking.

If that whole argument escapes you and gives you no reason for pause then all I can say is it will be a long, long career for all of us.
No, it's not the problem, it's the truth.

Neither CAL or UAL would have "gone under" had the merger not occurred. We would have both been fine. Are we "a better entity" with the merger. On paper, we sure are. Now we have to actually perform up to those expectations.

As for the thought that CAL was so fu#$ed if it hadn't been for United...just take a look at USAir. They were the worst off of all the Legacy carriers back in 2008 and they were losing more money than anyone else, even with their low cost structure. AA was about to declare bankruptcy. We would have been fine without a merger, both companies.

Had the merger between CAL and UAL not happened, would UAL/USAir be approved? It was shot down once by the DOJ, so we'll never know. The DOJ says AA and USAir are just fine now that they are recovering from the recession. They argue they can't compete with Delta and United now. We know that's BS since Jetblue still competes. Alaska still competes. Spirit still competes. ****, do they really think they are just going to fold if a merger doesn't happen?

It's always better to be the bigger entity, since you have more market share and can control the industry more that way.

L-UAL argues that since CAL didn't have financing for all of the aircraft orders we had coming, that we were just going to tell Boeing that even though Air Ethiopia can afford to buy their aircraft, Continental Airlines won't be able to. Of course not, they were looking for a better deal. They would have gotten the airplanes anyway, but probably would have to pay a higher interest rate on them. There was nothing stopping those airplanes from showing up on property.

Would we have started HUBs in SFO, ORD, DEN, and LAX without the merger? I can argue LAX, but probably not the others. Just like if you had merged with USAir, they would have put aircraft in those UAL hubs too. We had those aircraft on order, and absent a merger, we would have grown somewhere. Down in the trenches, we weren't privy to all the growth locations, but it was planned.

More data... The 787 WOULD have been on property 3 years earlier had it not been for BOEING. Those were growth A/C (minus the 767s that were parked after the merger) that was part of our previous contract negotiation. Now we'll never get that growth for years to come if ever since we will be using those 787s most likely to replace aging A/C at United.

When I went to job fairs back in 2007, where were all the long lines? They were at Delta, Continental, and Airtran. United wasn't even a blip on the radar since they had no growth whatsoever and were stagnant. When the United window opened up, it was a lot like the USAir window, no one really was that enthusiastic about it at the time, but sure, maybe I'll throw a courtesy app at them, just like Jetblue to get out of whatever current situation they were in.

I know everyone wanted to go to UAL back in 1999-2001, but that changed after 9/11. UAL didn't recover till about 2007, then they had so much debt they had to put the spare parts of their aircraft as collateral to pay the bills.

Don't try and change history or Deny that UAL guys were ecstatic they were going to Merge with CAL, the only growing legacy, versus USAir, who had been shrinking for years at that point.
Zoomie is offline  
Old 09-07-2013, 06:01 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
It just doesn't matter. You were a furloughed Cal pilot when this merger went down and now you're at the bottom of the tank. Deal with it. The time for talk is over. The arbs have rendered a fair and equitable list. It's done. Time to move on.

Sled
It was a simple question ... I have already heard all the UAL talking heads profuse their Devine beliefs ... How was L-UAL going to add 500+ jobs in 2010 to 2012 without the CAL merger? Please share your abounding wisdom, and sure throw in an insult or 2.
SEDPA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PackTrip
Mergers and Acquisitions
22
12-15-2008 09:48 PM
Purple Nugget
Cargo
40
05-30-2008 12:06 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
04-13-2008 07:40 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
08-24-2007 06:06 PM
NetJets_DA2Easy
Fractional
5
07-30-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices