Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Vacancy Bid (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/77319-vacancy-bid.html)

SpecialTracking 09-24-2013 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Skyflyin (Post 1489771)
You may like to repeat that ST, but what the CAL MC proposed was exactly what was awarded in the Delta/NWA merger and not very far from the UAL proposal. I was surprised that the arbs did not define what "awarded training" meant, just for the reason that the two sides seem to be arguing now.

Besides, I wasn't talking about the 14-02 guys, but the guys that would be bumped that are already in the position.

What the arbitrators wrote was definitive. Who cares what was awarded at DAL/NWA? I guess if it has worked for LCAL in the past , they will continue to feed at the trough until it is empty.

Skyflyin 09-24-2013 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1489779)
What the arbitrators wrote was definitive. Who cares what was awarded at DAL/NWA? I guess if it has worked for LCAL in the past , they will continue to feed at the trough until it is empty.

What they wrote was not definitive as I just explained and that is why the two sides are arguing now (if it's true they are arguing). One of the many mistakes the arbitrators made IMO.

GoCats67 09-24-2013 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 1489714)
They already did it......



Date: September 6, 2013 Expires: September 16, 2013 To: Pilots | From: Crew Resources/WHQCM

Displacement Awards Per 737 MOU

Eligible Pilots Only
The following only affects pilots who are entitled to a displacement pursuant to the 737 MOU dated July 10, 2013. This will only impact pilots who are not in training, have not received a training assignment bid (TAB) award, or have not been pay protected for an assignment.
If you have received a CCS message, you are eligible for displacement rights under the MOU above.
A pilot with displacement rights is permitted to remain in his/her staffed position, or select another category to which their seniority can hold, which may include your prior award. For this interim process, no pilot will be affected by another pilot exercising their displacement rights. However, if future analysis determines an excess of pilot staffing exists, there is the potential for category/BES displacements under section 8 of the contract.
Pilots who do not wish to change their staffed position do not need to respond to this bulletin.
To facilitate this decision, a Junior Pilot Table (sample below) will indicate the junior- most pilot assuming the future movements as of the most recent TAB. Pilots holding displacements will be counted in their present operating positions.

A pilot deciding to exercise displacement rights and select a new category must email that election to [email protected] by 0800 CDT September 16th. A printable form with required information for pilot election is provided on the following page. Should a pilot submit more than one form, only the last submission will be considered. An immediate return email response will be generated to confirm receipt of the request.

Upon Processing, participating pilots will receive CCS notice of the revised award. The revised award will be referenced as 14_02D for future reference.

This is prob what the debate is over. Since this seems to say that pilots awarded a training date would not eligible for displacement rights, it would seem to say that the company is planning on sending them to school. That would be in direct conflict with the SLI award.

So, I am betting that is the sticking point. Not so much whether they are eligible for displacement rights, but more that they are not eligible to go to a training class that had not started prior to the SLI. So, if they aren't eligible to start training then they would definitely be eligible for a bump, but the fight is prob over whether the training assignments awarded in the NOV TAFB are still valid.

SpecialTracking 09-24-2013 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by Skyflyin (Post 1489797)
What they wrote was not definitive as I just explained and that is why the two sides are arguing now (if it's true they are arguing). One of the many mistakes the arbitrators made IMO.

C'mon man. The TPA was definitive but that didn't stop JPOS from arguing that pilots with future training dates could keep their bids when it clearly stated in training or has completed training.

jsled 09-24-2013 05:14 PM

The Way I See It
 
1. The SFO MOU gave displacement rights and training rights, but also stated the arb. award would take precedence.

2. The arb. award seems to contradict the MOU therefore there is a dispute between the company/CALALPA v UALALPA.

That's fine. What else is new. B U T.......this bid 14-02D is not on Skynet like every other CAL bid for all to see. I didn't even know about it. I would bet MOST UAL pilots don't know about it. WHere is the company communication? Is this a secret bid? I want to see who is involved and what the outcome is....just like every other bid, vacancy or displacement, in my 16 year career. NO GAMES. The company needs to man up and TELL us what is what. UFB.

Sled

SpecialTracking 09-24-2013 05:18 PM

Sled,

Those involved will only man up when they are caught and forced to do so.

Birddog 09-24-2013 05:19 PM

Come on Skyflyin. The S-CAL guys are going to argue the meaning of "in the process of training". Who is your legal counsel now Bill Clinton?

jsled 09-24-2013 05:21 PM


Originally Posted by Birddog (Post 1489730)
Damn Jsled,

You're a resourceful little monkey. It didn't take you long to find that gem.

I know I tried to wind you up earlier, but they are trying this. The game isn't over---they haven't "done" it yet.

You said you can wait a year? That wait from A-320 FO to 737 CA is $60,000. Still don't mind waiting?

Well lt. col. dog, they HAVE done it. It closed on the 16th. They could undo it I guess. And as for that year, I am a 767FO with pretty nice seniority. I would rather not jump into RSV on the Guppy and be crew scheds' whipping boy. A little ex-CON RSV cushion might be a good thing. ;)

SLed the monkey

CALFO 09-24-2013 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by Probe (Post 1489772)
CALFO;
They are already flying inefficient trips. There won't be enough 80 hour months to go around. There simply won't be enough block hours.

Yes, some of the Captains will retire straight out of the 75 fleet. But most of the pilots will not. Bumping gives you a paid move, free PS commuter passes, and no training freeze. Few will bid off until they gut bumped. I wouldn't.

400 retirements a year is only 3% of our pilot group. This is nowhere near "massive". Just "normal". 3% a year for 33 years equals? All of us. This is simply a normal rate of retirement.

Every pilot at ual is already entitled to both a free merger move and as well as a career move. The percentage of retirements is closer to 4, but its not the percentage it's the numbers. 400 pilots leaving from the top of the food chain creates a ton of vacancies.

As for people not bidding off until they are bumped; again you are thinking downward not upward. During a reduction pilots get bumped down. Right now they can bid up. Do you really think that a mid level 757 cap that can now bid over to the 777 is going to sit around and wait to get bumped? I doubt it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:24 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands