Vacancy Bid
Where da bid, Yo? Let's get some movement off in this mofo. :confused:
|
Everybody saying out yesterday. Nada on CCS.
|
Jsled,
They have to sift through the scraps after awarding the 14-02 bumps in Bid 14-02D. What were you hoping for 736/757 FO to IAH or EWR? Cheers, Birddog |
IDK, Birddog. I just want to see what's what. There are Capt's junior to me in all 737 bases, so I got that going for me...which is nice. ;) Just have to wait and see the bid, then develope a game plan in the war room. Bring on da bid!!
Sled |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1489550)
Where da bid, Yo? Let's get some movement off in this mofo. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1489569)
IDK, Birddog. I just want to see what's what. There are Capt's junior to me in all 737 bases, so I got that going for me...which is nice. ;) Just have to wait and see the bid, then develope a game plan in the war room. Bring on da bid!!
Sled |
Originally Posted by GoCats67
(Post 1489570)
At least the CCS Vacancy bid screen now recognizes me despite being a legacy United guy. Not sure how the Seniority number on that screen works. Mine is about 400 numbers better than the ISL award. We haven't had that many guys retire since April and I am senior to all but a few voluntary furloughs and senior to all the involuntary furloughs, so they shouldn't affect it.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1489573)
I noticed that as well. 424 numbers for me. Can't figure that out.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1489573)
I noticed that as well. 424 numbers for me. Can't figure that out.
|
Jsled, joking aside vacancy bids will be limited once displacement Bid 14-02D is awarded. Get your expectations down.
|
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489585)
Jsled, joking aside vacancy bids will be limited once displacement Bid 14-02D is awarded. Get your expectations down.
SLed |
Jsled,
You are like the energizer bunny. Ok, more blunt. There will be no 737 or 757 Captain bids for a long long time. Birddod |
It was supposed to be out yesterday per official comm. Makes one wonder if they ran into some big uh-oh before posting it. Usually, if they miss the day it supposed to be out it a few days after so I wouldn't hold my breath. Shame is it impacts so many people across the board the angst is understandable.
|
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489600)
Jsled,
You are like the energizer bunny. Ok, more blunt. There will be no 737 or 757 Captain bids for a long long time. Birddod |
Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88
(Post 1489601)
It was supposed to be out yesterday per official comm. Makes one wonder if they ran into some big uh-oh before posting it. Usually, if they miss the day it supposed to be out it a few days after so I wouldn't hold my breath. Shame is it impacts so many people across the board the angst is understandable.
|
Seniority is forever, sure. But it doesn't do you a damn bit of good when the bumps fill the place up for a year. Then the bumpee's are protected by the company shrinking the 767's through attrition and going fat on manning reducing vacancies. The S-UAL pilots may be in for a shock. We'll see soon. Hope I'm wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489615)
Seniority is forever, sure. But it doesn't do you a damn bit of good when the bumps fill the place up for a year. Then the bumpee's are protected by the company shrinking the 767's through attrition and going fat on manning reducing vacancies. The S-UAL pilots may be in for a shock. We'll see soon. Hope I'm wrong.
SFO and also ORD need so many more 737 assignments as we go forward to efficiently fly the trips, that I think it will start with SFO bids and once whatever bumps have to happen from 14-02 have their first round complete, you will start to see other bids. The other thing that I would expect to see is 320 bids in both EWR and IAH. Again the junior folks on 14-02 won't be able to hold Captain on the Bus for some time, so I don't think the bumps off of 14-02 will affect that either. |
1. “Qualification Training”
The UAL Committee’s pilots in training proposed C&R (Number 1.3) is as follows: Pilots who, at the time of implementation of an integrated seniority list, are in the process of completing or who have completed qualification training for a new position (e.g., B-777 Captain or A-319 First Officer) may be assigned to the position for which they are being or have been trained, regardless of their relative standing on the Integrated Seniority List. Two of the CAL Committee's proposed C&Rs address pilots in training: Neither the implementation of the ISL nor the implementation or expiration of a condition or restriction herein, in and of itself, shall cause the displacement of any pilot from his or her then-current position (including a pilot who has been awarded a position but has not commenced or completed training). Pilots who, at the time of implementation of the ISL, are in the process of completing or who have completed qualification training for a new position (e.g., B-777 Captain or A320 First Officer) may be assigned to the position for which they are being or have been trained, regardless of their relative standing on the ISL. Pilots awarded new positions shall be considered as “in the process of completing . . . qualification training for a new position”, within the meaning of this provision, unless and until they have cancelled their bids for the new positions, withdrawn from training, failed the training without further recourse to further training, or successfully completed the training. The CAL Committee’s training protection proposals include “a pilot who has been awarded a position but has not commenced or completed training.” (Emphasis added). That expanded definition would have the Board sweep into protective coverage some 400 CAL pilots awarded tentative February 2014 positions in the January 2013 CAL Bid 14-02. As of the close of these arbitration hearings, many of those individuals had not even been awarded a training date, let alone begun training. Moreover, treating them as “currently in” those positions or “in the process of completing training” would unilaterally rewrite language mutually agreed to by the CAL pilots, the UAL pilots and the Company (See TPA Section 5-B. Acceptance of the Integrated Seniority List, in Appendix 1). There simply is no fair and equitable basis for this Board to award what the CAL Committee proposes. Under the guise of protecting pilots from displacement from “then-current positions”, it would extend such protection to pilots who don’t actually have such positions at all. In short, if granted, it would interfere with the fair operation of the ISL forever by placing CAL pilots immovably in positions that their ISL seniority would not entitle them to hold. For all of those reasons, this Board did not adopt the CAL Committees' proposed C&R Numbers 1(b) and 1(c). |
Bumps are based off of TABs not activated pilots. So if a TAB has been assigned under the SFO MOU they can bump the crap out of SFO.
I don't know how many of the 400 are left untrained to bump. But you're getting setup for an expensive lesson. I find it funny how S-UAL pilots always explain it away when they are possibly about to be hosed. Wouldn't you rather see the TPA, UPA, SFO MOU, and ISL enforced? |
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489600)
Jsled,
You are like the energizer bunny. Ok, more blunt. There will be no 737 or 757 Captain bids for a long long time. Birddod |
I already got awarded my DEN 787 captain bid... I guess the fence is down for me?
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1489641)
I already got awarded my DEN 787 captain bid... I guess the fence is down for me?
|
Not a fence. Just lack of vacancies. They are supposedly hashing out this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. It just never stops. I'm trying to find some humor in it.
It ain't over until the fat United pilot is in his 737 captain seat. You want to use your seniority? No Vac-eee, No Bid-eee.. Interesting to see what gets decided. The correct path or the grievance path. |
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489631)
Bumps are based off of TABs not activated pilots. So if a TAB has been assigned under the SFO MOU they can bump the crap out of SFO.
I don't know how many of the 400 are left untrained to bump. But you're getting setup for an expensive lesson. I find it funny how S-UAL pilots always explain it away when they are possibly about to be hosed. Wouldn't you rather see the TPA, UPA, SFO MOU, and ISL enforced? So, I would expect there will be a lot of bumps as you are speculating, but I still don't see how that is going to limit the number of SFO 737 bids that come out. |
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489646)
Not a fence. Just lack of vacancies. They are supposedly hashing out this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. It just never stops. I'm trying to find some humor in it.
It ain't over until the fat United pilot is in his 737 captain seat. You want to use your seniority? No Vac-eee, No Bid-eee.. Interesting to see what gets decided. The correct path or the grievance path. |
They're discussing this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. Vacancies won't end, they'll just slow way down if this plan wins. But time is money.
In a CCS memo the S-CAL pilots were told they could bump according to the TABs. Any CAL pilots want to chime in? Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path. |
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489656)
Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path.
|
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489615)
Seniority is forever, sure. But it doesn't do you a damn bit of good when the bumps fill the place up for a year. Then the bumpee's are protected by the company shrinking the 767's through attrition and going fat on manning reducing vacancies. The S-UAL pilots may be in for a shock. We'll see soon. Hope I'm wrong.
Sled |
Well something is holding it up. A day late now. If I was a betting type my money would be on a CAL vs UAL rift over the nature of the bid. Could it be the bid was a whopper one or both of the sides couldn't swallow?
|
Originally Posted by Birddog
(Post 1489656)
They're discussing this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. Vacancies won't end, they'll just slow way down if this plan wins. But time is money.
In a CCS memo the S-CAL pilots were told they could bump according to the TABs. Any CAL pilots want to chime in? Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path. |
Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88
(Post 1489689)
Well something is holding it up. A day late now. If I was a betting type my money would be on a CAL vs UAL rift over the nature of the bid. Could it be the bid was a whopper one or both of the sides couldn't swallow?
They claim that they lose their bid, but then they immediately bump right back in to it. Clearly, that does not satisfy the SLI decision which stated that untrained pilots were not entitled to those seats. If you lose your bid, just enter a new selection when the new bid comes out. You can fly anything that your NEW seniority can hold. If the company doesn't "get" that....there will be INSTANT lawsuits and grievances filed. |
Originally Posted by untied
(Post 1489709)
I think the problem is that the CAL guys think they found a way around the SLI decision.
They claim that they lose their bid, but then they immediately bump right back in to it. Clearly, that does not satisfy the SLI decision which stated that untrained pilots were not entitled to those seats. If you lose your bid, just enter a new selection when the new bid comes out. You can fly anything that your NEW seniority can hold. If the company doesn't "get" that....there will be INSTANT lawsuits and grievances filed. They already did it...... Date: September 6, 2013 Expires: September 16, 2013 To: Pilots | From: Crew Resources/WHQCM Displacement Awards Per 737 MOU Eligible Pilots Only The following only affects pilots who are entitled to a displacement pursuant to the 737 MOU dated July 10, 2013. This will only impact pilots who are not in training, have not received a training assignment bid (TAB) award, or have not been pay protected for an assignment. If you have received a CCS message, you are eligible for displacement rights under the MOU above. A pilot with displacement rights is permitted to remain in his/her staffed position, or select another category to which their seniority can hold, which may include your prior award. For this interim process, no pilot will be affected by another pilot exercising their displacement rights. However, if future analysis determines an excess of pilot staffing exists, there is the potential for category/BES displacements under section 8 of the contract. Pilots who do not wish to change their staffed position do not need to respond to this bulletin. To facilitate this decision, a Junior Pilot Table (sample below) will indicate the junior- most pilot assuming the future movements as of the most recent TAB. Pilots holding displacements will be counted in their present operating positions. A pilot deciding to exercise displacement rights and select a new category must email that election to [email protected] by 0800 CDT September 16th. A printable form with required information for pilot election is provided on the following page. Should a pilot submit more than one form, only the last submission will be considered. An immediate return email response will be generated to confirm receipt of the request. Upon Processing, participating pilots will receive CCS notice of the revised award. The revised award will be referenced as 14_02D for future reference. |
Damn Jsled,
You're a resourceful little monkey. It didn't take you long to find that gem. I know I tried to wind you up earlier, but they are trying this. The game isn't over---they haven't "done" it yet. You said you can wait a year? That wait from A-320 FO to 737 CA is $60,000. Still don't mind waiting? |
So obviously some communication from mgmt or the union is too much to ask for. What was I thinking.
|
So you guys are saying it is all going smoothly?
Doing vacancies before displacements makes no sense to me. I was surprised to not see a big displacement bid right after ISL. I can't see NOT bumping 757 l-UAL pilots. A bump is much better than a bid, I doubt most 757 pilots would bid off if they are getting paid to not fly. To the CAL pilots who think they will bump right back to the same position, bumps are not single bids. There will be multiple displacement bids, until manpower gets the numbers they want. What this means is perhaps a pilot can bump to the same position, but the next week when the next bump comes out, he gets bumped again, this time somewhere downhill. Let the bumps begin. |
I think this bears reading one more time. From the arbitrators...
"There simply is no fair and equitable basis for this Board to award what the CAL Committee proposes. Under the guise of protecting pilots from displacement from “then-current positions”, it would extend such protection to pilots who don’t actually have such positions at all. In short, if granted, it would interfere with the fair operation of the ISL forever by placing CAL pilots immovably in positions that their ISL seniority would not entitle them to hold." ...in other words, if you are not in training, you will not be afforded protections. |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1489742)
So you guys are saying it is all going smoothly?
acancies before displacements makes no sense to me. I was surprised to not see a big displacement bid right after ISL. I can't see NOT bumping 757 l-UAL pilots. A bump is much better than a bid, I doubt most 757 pilots would bid off if they are getting paid to not fly. To the CAL pilots who think they will bump right back to the same position, bumps are not single bids. There will be multiple displacement bids, until manpower gets the numbers they want. What this means is perhaps a pilot can bump to the same position, but the next week when the next bump comes out, he gets bumped again, this time somewhere downhill. Let the bumps begin. All the company has to do is to set the min low on the 756 and wait for the pilots to leave on their own. What displacements that do occur do not mean that pilots will be bumped out of their seat as another vacancy bid is almost guaranteed prior to 120 days after the displacement. As for pilots not bidding out so they can get paid not to work, my guess is that extremely inefficient trips (14 days off for 80 hours) will probably solve that problem. |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1489751)
I think this bears reading one more time. From the arbitrators...
"There simply is no fair and equitable basis for this Board to award what the CAL Committee proposes. Under the guise of protecting pilots from displacement from “then-current positions”, it would extend such protection to pilots who don’t actually have such positions at all. In short, if granted, it would interfere with the fair operation of the ISL forever by placing CAL pilots immovably in positions that their ISL seniority would not entitle them to hold." ...in other words, if you are not in training, you will not be afforded protections. The UAL Committee’s pilots in training proposed C&R (Number 1.3) is as follows: Pilots who, at the time of implementation of an integrated seniority list, are in the process of completing or who have completed qualification training for a new position (e.g., B-777 Captain or A-319 First Officer) may be assigned to the position for which they are being or have been trained, regardless of their relative standing on the Integrated Seniority List. I was surprised that the arbs did not define what "in the process of training" meant, just for the reason that the two sides seem to be arguing now. Besides, I wasn't talking about the 14-02 guys, but the guys that would be bumped that are already in the position. |
CALFO;
They are already flying inefficient trips. There won't be enough 80 hour months to go around. There simply won't be enough block hours. Yes, some of the Captains will retire straight out of the 75 fleet. But most of the pilots will not. Bumping gives you a paid move, free PS commuter passes, and no training freeze. Few will bid off until they gut bumped. I wouldn't. 400 retirements a year is only 3% of our pilot group. This is nowhere near "massive". Just "normal". 3% a year for 33 years equals? All of us. This is simply a normal rate of retirement. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands