Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer" >

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Search

Notices

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2015 | 03:02 PM
  #211  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

So, this presents a unified pilot group going into contract talks, what, next year??

Regardless of the plight of IAH pilots, which I don't wish on anyone, this would be a very bad precedent to set.
Reply
Old 05-02-2015 | 03:44 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
So, this presents a unified pilot group going into contract talks, what, next year??

Regardless of the plight of IAH pilots, which I don't wish on anyone, this would be a very bad precedent to set.
Nothing will unify a group like the company's section 6 Christmas list. I still have faith, although sometimes shaken.
Reply
Old 05-02-2015 | 03:47 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
So, this presents a unified pilot group going into contract talks, what, next year??

Regardless of the plight of IAH pilots, which I don't wish on anyone, this would be a very bad precedent to set.
Yes. The argument here is "protecting IAH pilots". Are we that fragmented as a group? Was there a "north vs south" battle for flying pre-merger at CAL that created this type of thinking?

What's worth is it harms the base. This is why. 100% of all the IAH pilots can stay in IAH on the surplus. No one can be forced out. Let's say a 737 Captain decides to go to EWR and stay a 737 Captain, he's choosing to leave the base. He's now a EWR based pilot. So 2 years down the road there is an IAH 737 Captain bid and a IAH based 756 FO who is senior decides to bid it, but it is being "held" for a guy who has been based in EWR for 2 years. How does that benefit the IAH based pilot? What does his seniority count for? Nothing, its been abrogated by politics.

This isn't going to happen period. Ben is 30 from the bottom and likely to be bumped, which is unfortunate. But where was this proposal when there were 40 737 pilots displaced from IAH in January? Now that Ben is affected he wants protection.

Fragmenting the pilot group by domicile and setting up competing political interests is not in the best interest of the entire pilot group.
Reply
Old 05-02-2015 | 07:12 PM
  #214  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Our(LUAL) entitlement to fly your -400 was probably a more than fair deal to not fence our 777s from the LCAL guys.
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 04:39 AM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
This isn't going to happen period.
I admittedly haven't been following this (not IAH based), but is there any formal proposal being submitted to the MEC? As you say, if the company wants to move pilots around, they're going to do it and I don't see any realistic path to avoiding IAH displacements.
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 06:13 AM
  #216  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
Yes. The argument here is "protecting IAH pilots". Are we that fragmented as a group? Was there a "north vs south" battle for flying pre-merger at CAL that created this type of thinking?

What's worth is it harms the base. This is why. 100% of all the IAH pilots can stay in IAH on the surplus. No one can be forced out. Let's say a 737 Captain decides to go to EWR and stay a 737 Captain, he's choosing to leave the base. He's now a EWR based pilot. So 2 years down the road there is an IAH 737 Captain bid and a IAH based 756 FO who is senior decides to bid it, but it is being "held" for a guy who has been based in EWR for 2 years. How does that benefit the IAH based pilot? What does his seniority count for? Nothing, its been abrogated by politics.

This isn't going to happen period. Ben is 30 from the bottom and likely to be bumped, which is unfortunate. But where was this proposal when there were 40 737 pilots displaced from IAH in January? Now that Ben is affected he wants protection.

Fragmenting the pilot group by domicile and setting up competing political interests is not in the best interest of the entire pilot group.
Maybe the LEC should ask the MEC for a joint resolution expressing sympathy for the plight of the IAH based pilots.

Then they can all retreat to a nice dinner and talk about it over some drinks.
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 09:55 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Our(LUAL) entitlement to fly your -400 was probably a more than fair deal to not fence our 777s from the LCAL guys.
Given the results of the 747 fence you guys demanded, it's too bad you didn't ask for all sorts if fences.
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 02:22 PM
  #218  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sovt
Given the results of the 747 fence you guys demanded, it's too bad you didn't ask for all sorts if fences.
Are you kidding? All LUAL Pilots wanted to be SUPER GUPPY pilots. In reality what we did was give the good LCAL guys a break by corralling most of the less desirables on SPARKY. You're welcome!
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 03:13 PM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Are you kidding? All LUAL Pilots wanted to be SUPER GUPPY pilots. In reality what we did was give the good LCAL guys a break by corralling most of the less desirables on SPARKY. You're welcome!
As usual it always breaks down to this…

Unfortunate.
Reply
Old 05-04-2015 | 04:16 PM
  #220  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy
As usual it always breaks down to this…

Unfortunate.
Yes, it's unfortunate that you didn't correct one of your own.


Originally Posted by sovt
Given the results of the 747 fence you guys demanded, it's too bad you didn't ask for all sorts if fences.

Last edited by AllenAllert; 05-04-2015 at 04:30 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM114
In Memory Of
4
12-18-2013 03:41 PM
md11retiree
In Memory Of
1
01-19-2013 06:23 AM
Jughead
Hangar Talk
40
02-21-2011 07:28 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
11-04-2010 12:26 AM
Commando
Cargo
31
03-06-2009 11:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices