Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer" >

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Search

Notices

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2015 | 08:06 AM
  #71  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

And I was just sitting here thinking that it'd been too long without a Sled bumpy bump post. And that I kinda miss Staller.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 08:19 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
And I was just sitting here thinking that it'd been too long without a Sled bumpy bump post. And that I kinda miss Staller.
I am just the messenger. Cut and pasted from company and union sources. Information is good.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 08:43 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I am just the messenger. Cut and pasted from company and union sources. Information is good.
And it is utterly shocking to all that you were that messenger on this board...
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 12:33 PM
  #74  
untied's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Default

That looks ugly. It will have rolling consequences throughout the system.

Looks like some of the junior Captains will get bumped. When the bids come out again (due to attrition) a lot of those folks won't be able to hold those seats for a LONG time.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 12:42 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
And I was just sitting here thinking that it'd been too long without a Sled bumpy bump post. And that I kinda miss Staller.
I am glad he came on here and forewarned me about a possible displacement, I heeded his warnings and flew a lot the past couple of years and I will this summer too. Stashing away cash with SRM, I'll take a couple years off at the top of a new BES. Thanks Sled.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 01:45 PM
  #76  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
And it is utterly shocking to all that you were that messenger on this board...

So is it upsetting to you that Sled posted some factual information or that we were lied to by management?
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 05:18 PM
  #77  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I guess one argument is that these pilots should have never been trained in the first place. That is water under the bridge. It is what it is. That, combined with their side effect, which was overstaffing in some of lUAL's 757 and 320 bases, means we still have way too many pilots in the wrong place. On a positive note, some BES's are so short they are paying guys 140 hours a month (or more) in SRM.

They should have started fixing this as soon as the SLI was done. Instead they have hired a bunch of new hires, and put them in seats only because there were training slots available (76T and 756), not because they were needed there. This only makes the problem, and the overstaffing, and the shortage of training slots worse.

What an cluster&$#@. We will be the "sick man" of the airline industry for quite a while.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 05:30 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I guess one argument is that these pilots should have never been trained in the first place. That is water under the bridge. It is what it is. That, combined with their side effect, which was overstaffing in some of lUAL's 757 and 320 bases, means we still have way too many pilots in the wrong place. On a positive note, some BES's are so short they are paying guys 140 hours a month (or more) in SRM.

They should have started fixing this as soon as the SLI was done. Instead they have hired a bunch of new hires, and put them in seats only because there were training slots available (76T and 756), not because they were needed there. This only makes the problem, and the overstaffing, and the shortage of training slots worse.

What an cluster&$#@. We will be the "sick man" of the airline industry for quite a while.
250 more displacements in IAH is gonna go to about 5800 seniority. I would think, most have been Captains for over a year before SLI. Why should they not have been trained?
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 05:39 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
Default

Well, I will probably be out for a month due to surgery, so there's 70 hours of Captain time someone can have in IAH. Should help the staffing numbers and reserve utilization.
Reply
Old 03-30-2015 | 06:41 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
I am glad he came on here and forewarned me about a possible displacement, I heeded his warnings and flew a lot the past couple of years and I will this summer too. Stashing away cash with SRM, I'll take a couple years off at the top of a new BES. Thanks Sled.
You're welcome. Take what you can get. That's what I always say. Looks like Ben is blaming Alpa for the pending displacements. He is all upset that Alpa wouldn't listen to the "Friends of Fred" type of deals that the IAH CP was offering. Well Ben, that's not how we do business at the new Continental (United). All bases are equal. Why should IAH be special?

Sledster
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM114
In Memory Of
4
12-18-2013 03:41 PM
md11retiree
In Memory Of
1
01-19-2013 06:23 AM
Jughead
Hangar Talk
40
02-21-2011 07:28 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
11-04-2010 12:26 AM
Commando
Cargo
31
03-06-2009 11:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices