Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer" >

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Search

Notices

Baghdad Bob "Attrition is the Answer"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2015 | 09:31 AM
  #101  
Kilder's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

Big difference here ladies,

The problem is that Houston was historically the biggest Continental hub and the 737 was the growing fleet thus it was staffed as such.

By now moving 737 flying to the legacy United hubs who got a helping hand by the unbiased arbitrators and ALPA national, the legacy United pilots gained bidding power while the legacy Continental pilots lost bidding power thus any moving of flying away from the Continental hubs will produce a negative movement to the legacy Continental pilots, thus the letter from Ben.

While this might seemed "Allright" to many of you, it is absurd to believe that there is not an invisible hand at work here to remove junior Ca's from IAH and then have normal vacancies giving LUAL pilots those same seats that attrition would provide within the scope of few years.

If the airline was experiencing difficulties, we could agree that it would make sense, but not in this environment of growth, hiring and natural movement.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 10:07 AM
  #102  
untied's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder
Big difference here ladies,

The problem is that Houston was historically the biggest Continental hub and the 737 was the growing fleet thus it was staffed as such.

By now moving 737 flying to the legacy United hubs who got a helping hand by the unbiased arbitrators and ALPA national, the legacy United pilots gained bidding power while the legacy Continental pilots lost bidding power thus any moving of flying away from the Continental hubs will produce a negative movement to the legacy Continental pilots, thus the letter from Ben.

While this might seemed "Allright" to many of you, it is absurd to believe that there is not an invisible hand at work here to remove junior Ca's from IAH and then have normal vacancies giving LUAL pilots those same seats that attrition would provide within the scope of few years.

If the airline was experiencing difficulties, we could agree that it would make sense, but not in this environment of growth, hiring and natural movement.
Well, that's a load of BS!

Houston has been overstaffed for years. They had some favoritism over EWR since those guys were more militant. Lots of DH to do flying of other bases.

They are finally fixing the problem.

I guarantee you that this current management HATES legacy UAL pilots and will do NOTHING to help them over the LCAL guys.

ALPA has absolutely no control over staffing. (This isn't CAL where the union and the company are good buddies making back-room deals).
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 10:13 AM
  #103  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Big difference here ladies,

The problem is that Houston was historically the biggest Continental hub and the 737 was the growing fleet thus it was staffed as such.

By now moving 737 flying to the legacy United hubs who got a helping hand by the unbiased arbitrators and ALPA national, the legacy United pilots gained bidding power while the legacy Continental pilots lost bidding power thus any moving of flying away from the Continental hubs will produce a negative movement to the legacy Continental pilots, thus the letter from Ben.

While this might seemed "Allright" to many of you, it is absurd to believe that there is not an invisible hand at work here to remove junior Ca's from IAH and then have normal vacancies giving LUAL pilots those same seats that attrition would provide within the scope of few years.

If the airline was experiencing difficulties, we could agree that it would make sense, but not in this environment of growth, hiring and natural movement.
I think Bugs hit this one square on the head with his reply.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 10:58 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder
Big difference here ladies,

The problem is that Houston was historically the biggest Continental hub and the 737 was the growing fleet thus it was staffed as such.

By now moving 737 flying to the legacy United hubs who got a helping hand by the unbiased arbitrators and ALPA national, the legacy United pilots gained bidding power while the legacy Continental pilots lost bidding power thus any moving of flying away from the Continental hubs will produce a negative movement to the legacy Continental pilots, thus the letter from Ben.

While this might seemed "Allright" to many of you, it is absurd to believe that there is not an invisible hand at work here to remove junior Ca's from IAH and then have normal vacancies giving LUAL pilots those same seats that attrition would provide within the scope of few years.

If the airline was experiencing difficulties, we could agree that it would make sense, but not in this environment of growth, hiring and natural movement.
To add to Untied's post, are you aware of the decline in the price of oil? Do you know what the impact has been on Houston's economy? Here's an article from yesterday: Local manufacturing industry sees effects of oil price decline - Community Impact Newspaper

Layoffs/increasing unemployment is never good for a city's air traffic. Houston's unemployment rate has increased by .5% in January 2015 alone. Compared to a decrease in national unemployment.

Economic contraction in Houston = Less O&D out of IAH = Less flying needed out of IAH.

Don't want to downgrade and don't want to go to one of those 'evil' LUAL hubs? Bid to EWR; you should have no problem holding your seat there. 'Problem' solved.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 01:36 PM
  #105  
Kilder's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
To add to Untied's post, are you aware of the decline in the price of oil? Do you know what the impact has been on Houston's economy? Here's an article from yesterday: Local manufacturing industry sees effects of oil price decline - Community Impact Newspaper

Layoffs/increasing unemployment is never good for a city's air traffic. Houston's unemployment rate has increased by .5% in January 2015 alone. Compared to a decrease in national unemployment.

Economic contraction in Houston = Less O&D out of IAH = Less flying needed out of IAH.

Don't want to downgrade and don't want to go to one of those 'evil' LUAL hubs? Bid to EWR; you should have no problem holding your seat there. 'Problem' solved.

I have not heard of any decrease of flying out of Houston...have you? Have they cancelled any cities???

The change has been that flying is going from IAH to other bases as those crews fly through IAH...

The shifting of flying out of IAH is being done purposefully and with intention to arrive at a set result desired by those that do not like the current staffing in IAH...not because of lack of flying demand...
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 02:12 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder
I have not heard of any decrease of flying out of Houston...have you? Have they cancelled any cities???

The change has been that flying is going from IAH to other bases as those crews fly through IAH...

The shifting of flying out of IAH is being done purposefully and with intention to arrive at a set result desired by those that do not like the current staffing in IAH...not because of lack of flying demand...
Yes, oil related companies have slashed their budgets for this year. I guarantee that there is a decrease in passenger traffic out of IAH due to those cutbacks.

There may not be any individual flight cuts yet (I don't know; I haven't been monitoring schedule changes), but they've already said that base manning would be addressed after the summer. I would expect a reduction in scheduled flights this fall that should match the decreased demand. The only published traffic statistics that I can find are through June 2014 which are not going to reflect the economic downturn in Houston.

Do you think it's a good idea to adjust flight scheduling to maximize passenger traffic?
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:12 PM
  #107  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

There has no been no reduction in flying from Houston. The company five years into the merger is still trying to move assets from the two legacy carriers to where they maximize return on investment. The flying has already been moved to a large extent. But some pilot positions are still out of place and need to be moved. Apparently some believe there is a conspiracy between Boston Consulting Group, the UAL MEC, and United management to stick it to junior former L-CAL 737 CA's in IAH to benefit former L-UAL pilots.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:22 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder
Big difference here ladies,

The problem is that Houston was historically the biggest Continental hub and the 737 was the growing fleet thus it was staffed as such.

By now moving 737 flying to the legacy United hubs who got a helping hand by the unbiased arbitrators and ALPA national, the legacy United pilots gained bidding power while the legacy Continental pilots lost bidding power thus any moving of flying away from the Continental hubs will produce a negative movement to the legacy Continental pilots, thus the letter from Ben.

While this might seemed "Allright" to many of you, it is absurd to believe that there is not an invisible hand at work here to remove junior Ca's from IAH and then have normal vacancies giving LUAL pilots those same seats that attrition would provide within the scope of few years.

If the airline was experiencing difficulties, we could agree that it would make sense, but not in this environment of growth, hiring and natural movement.
C'mon man. You were jumping for joy when Continental started "moving 737 flying to legacy United hubs" back before the SLI....when UAL dudes couldn't bid. Remember? I don't know what you're crying about now. You, Ben, and Sleeves won't even lose your seat. Enjoy the commute to Chicaaago.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 04:16 PM
  #109  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
C'mon man. You were jumping for joy when Continental started "moving 737 flying to legacy United hubs" back before the SLI....when UAL dudes couldn't bid. Remember? I don't know what you're crying about now. You, Ben, and Sleeves won't even lose your seat. Enjoy the commute to Chicaaago.
Continental has announced that it was going to open new 737 bases in those cities because of the 100+ 737s on order. That would have happened regardless of the merger.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 04:30 PM
  #110  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Continental has announced that it was going to open new 737 bases in those cities because of the 100+ 737s on order. That would have happened regardless of the merger.
Yeah, wow, I get it now. The CAL powerhouse was going to challenge and decimate UAL and American in ORD, UAL and SWA in DEN, UAL in SFO, UAL, AMR, and DAL in LAX.

Sorry man, I was too naive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM114
In Memory Of
4
12-18-2013 03:41 PM
md11retiree
In Memory Of
1
01-19-2013 06:23 AM
Jughead
Hangar Talk
40
02-21-2011 07:28 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
11-04-2010 12:26 AM
Commando
Cargo
31
03-06-2009 11:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices