Current United Junior Bases
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
#12
Your original question for DEN: the bottom 737 guy who is not on a leave appears to be a Feb 2008 hire (CAL side). UAL equivalent would be 2000-2001.
There is a active new-hire below that, but I think he is being bumped to EWR...chart was hard to interpret.
There is a active new-hire below that, but I think he is being bumped to EWR...chart was hard to interpret.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Sledboard
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Thank you guys for all your contributions for those of us with endless questions! From what I gather Airbus/737 will get a new hire out to SFO/LAX within a few months is that correct? If given the choice between either of those and not much of a preference between SFO/LAX would the 737 be the best option for future movement?
#15
Well I guess the good news is a lot of those guys are super senior and most likely retiring much sooner!
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 173
Thank you guys for all your contributions for those of us with endless questions! From what I gather Airbus/737 will get a new hire out to SFO/LAX within a few months is that correct? If given the choice between either of those and not much of a preference between SFO/LAX would the 737 be the best option for future movement?
#18
Just curious where an LAX base is in the seniority rankings. I actually want IAH if I am fortunate enough to get hired but the wife wants to stay in SoCal. I told her that is impossible the first few years, for both seniority reasons and financial.
#19
LAX used to be jr and I think it will again in the future. You should be there before the 2 year mark though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post