Houston, you have a problem?
05-21-2015, 10:07 AM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by jsled
why should I be jealous of a group stapled well below me? 
Perhaps a little surprised by your (05-06 types) senseless arguments (sli, grandfather rights). But they always prove to be wrong. Amusing and entitled, but wrong.
Sled
Perhaps a little surprised by your (05-06 types) senseless arguments (sli, grandfather rights). But they always prove to be wrong. Amusing and entitled, but wrong. Sled
05-21-2015, 10:16 AM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
You're in the weeds as usual. What could I possibly be jealous of him of? I, and pretty much everyone outside of IAH, disagree that he has any valid points.
05-21-2015, 11:04 AM
#64
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Originally Posted by sleeves
From all the bumpity,bumpity talk you are jealous of their Capt. Positions. You people can't wait to displace them.
Short answer is the company benefits from the "Houston carve-out". If passed, it would effectively allow the company to use surpluses as a longer TDY type action without the cost. The Houston CP office negotiated this deal with Ben and sold it as a way to protect Houston pilots. Unfortunately, it would be applied system wide and affect all United pilots. Make no mistake the company wants this and it's bad for all United pilots(including those that still consider themselves CAL pilots)
Stop the CAL vs UAL stuff, defend the contract and stop the rogue actions and schemes coming from some self-serving ALPA leaders.
05-21-2015, 11:05 AM
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
Originally Posted by sleeves
Apparently Leneski, doesn't and he is not in IAH, I am on the fence and see valid points, and I am not in IAH.
Last edited by Blockoutblockin; 05-21-2015 at 11:32 AM.
05-21-2015, 11:26 AM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Originally Posted by awax
For reference, does anyone have a copy of the resolution that must have been passed by the CAL MEC when the EWR domicile was "right sized" with displacements to IAH before the merger? This must have come up then, right?
Also, did this resolution actually get passed at an LEC meeting?
Also, did this resolution actually get passed at an LEC meeting?
Originally Posted by Birddog
It was passed Friday.
I give this resolution a high change of being disposed of at the MEC by being shown as "Discussed" and will waste time and money doing so. Nice job IAH. In unity mofo's
05-21-2015, 11:29 AM
#67
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by sleeves
From all the bumpity,bumpity talk you are jealous of their Capt. Positions. You people can't wait to displace them.
05-21-2015, 11:51 AM
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Originally Posted by sleeves
From all the bumpity,bumpity talk you are jealous of their Capt. Positions. You people can't wait to displace them.
Sled
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris
Flight Schools and Training
14
12-21-2008 03:08 AM
