Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Houston, you have a problem? >

Houston, you have a problem?

Search

Notices

Houston, you have a problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:03 PM
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher
Newsflash...want to know what happens when I fly with a guy I didn't enjoy flying with? At the end of the trip, I shake his hand, tell him to enjoy his days off, and go home. Usually nothing is ever said (unless the guy is a complete epic jerkoff). And that is probably the norm on the line...so it would behoove one to convince themselves that they are on everyone's bid list just yet.

The 747 deal was a carve out as well. A displacement is a displacement. Why couldn't they be subject to the normal process as well? What makes them so special? Either you support both or support neither, unless you are a hypocrite.

The whole intention of this resolution is to prevent a pseudo-flush bid a year later, one that Ineptner so desperately wants. I have zero trust in that divisive buffoon.
Well there IS a difference, whether you want to identify it or not. The ORD 747 situation was a base CLOSURE, not a bump. They are different things. If you don't believe so, talk to the #1 777 CAP in SEA. The bumps that followed have so far ALL been on the LUAL side. And you will notice that not ONE TIME did a LUAL pilot come on this board and suggest that the ORD 747 MOU should apply. The hypocrisy you reference would have been an appropriate label if folks had come on this board advocating for 24 months for the DEN and ORD bumps, but NOT for IAH. If you notice, this sounds VERY much like what is being touted by IAH right now.... 24 month grandfather rights ONLY sound like a good idea now that it's happening to them. You can't honestly think that if DEN or ORD council's had advocated for 24 month grandfather rights that Ben wouldn't have been up in arms! I didn't hear a PEEP from the LCAL folks about grandfather rights when it was just LUAL pilots being displaced. I'm truly surprised you can't see how that would be looked at as entitled.

I understand that you don't like Heppner. Fair enough. Every time Pierce or Salley open their mouth I want to vomit. I think it's just the nature of the beast.

The good news is that on the line I fly with a nice mix of LUAL, LCAL, and new hires. Almost to a person I find them pleasant and easy to get along with. We go fly our trip and have a good time, regardless of our background. Hopefully that is the norm going forward for all of us.

As I have said several times: to those pilots facing a bump, I truly hope you find a soft landing somewhere. If the momentum keeps going the way it has been recently, hopefully it won't be long before you are back in the seat and domicile you want to be in.
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:05 PM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by rp2pilot
Try and keep your cool, don't let the downgrade destroy your fragile self image, and use the time back in the right seat to figure out the things that you like and dislike about different Captains. You'll be better in the left seat when you get back there.
Probably THE best advice I've seen on APC with regards to bumps. When I ended up back in the right seat for a year after 9/11 I remember seeing things quite differently and learning a lot from the experience. Wish it hadn't happened, but I DO hope it made me a better Captain from then on. Good post.
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:10 PM
  #83  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Run Forrest RUN!!!

The 747 deal was a carve out as well. A displacement is a displacement. Why couldn't they be subject to the normal process as well? What makes them so special? Either you support both or support neither, unless you are a hypocrite.
A base closure is different from a displacement. PERIOD end of story.

When they closed the 747 in ORD there were no more 747's in ORD. Pilots were no longer able to bid the 747 in ORD.

They are getting ready to close the 76T base in Denver too. There will not be anymore 757's or 767's based out of DEN. No pilot will be able to hold or bid a 757 in DEN. That will not be a displacement, it will be a base closure.

They are not closing the 737 base in IAH. There will still be 737's based in IAH. There will still be pilots who can bid the 737 in IAH. See the difference?

Do y'all need a picture drawn in crayon or is it perfectly clear now?
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:28 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 558
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Well there IS a difference, whether you want to identify it or not. The ORD 747 situation was a base CLOSURE, not a bump. They are different things. If you don't believe so, talk to the #1 777 CAP in SEA. The bumps that followed have so far ALL been on the LUAL side. And you will notice that not ONE TIME did a LUAL pilot come on this board and suggest that the ORD 747 MOU should apply. The hypocrisy you reference would have been an appropriate label if folks had come on this board advocating for 24 months for the DEN and ORD bumps, but NOT for IAH. If you notice, this sounds VERY much like what is being touted by IAH right now.... 24 month grandfather rights ONLY sound like a good idea now that it's happening to them. You can't honestly think that if DEN or ORD council's had advocated for 24 month grandfather rights that Ben wouldn't have been up in arms! I didn't hear a PEEP from the LCAL folks about grandfather rights when it was just LUAL pilots being displaced. I'm truly surprised you can't see how that would be looked at as entitled.

I understand that you don't like Heppner. Fair enough. Every time Pierce or Salley open their mouth I want to vomit. I think it's just the nature of the beast.


How do you know Ben would have been up in arms if DEN came up with this resolution? Do you really believe every displaced LUAL just smiled and couldn't have cared less if his local council was advocating minimizing displacements on his behalf? Of course not. And btw most guys are not on this board anyway so the lack of their gripes on this board does not infer that they are 100% content with their situation.

Yes as union we are looking out for the greater good, but we also have large vested interest in things that greatly impact us individually, nothing at all wrong with that. Do you cry every time someone on the news dies? After all it is someone else's father, mother, daughter, etc. Of course not, unless it was someone close to you. Guys in IAH have different issues than guys in ORD, guys in ORD have different issues than LAX, and so on. Not really a valid argument to say nobody cares until it happens to them.

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
The good news is that on the line I fly with a nice mix of LUAL, LCAL, and new hires. Almost to a person I find them pleasant and easy to get along with. We go fly our trip and have a good time, regardless of our background. Hopefully that is the norm going forward for all of us.

As I have said several times: to those pilots facing a bump, I truly hope you find a soft landing somewhere. If the momentum keeps going the way it has been recently, hopefully it won't be long before you are back in the seat and domicile you want to be in.
Agree
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:40 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Well Knotcher...Hoss is asking. Do you need a crayon drawing? Closure = Closure. Displacement = Displacement. Apples. Oranges. Got it?

Sled
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:45 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: 73 CA EWR
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Well Knotcher...Hoss is asking. Do you need a crayon drawing? Closure = Closure. Displacement = Displacement. Apples. Oranges. Got it?

Sled
Too funny! I know, a rhetorical question. These people will never get it and first to cross!
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 04:59 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by rp2pilot
Try and keep your cool, don't let the downgrade destroy your fragile self image, and use the time back in the right seat to figure out the things that you like and dislike about different Captains. You'll be better in the left seat when you get back there.
Don't worry pal it won't get to me. Thanks though.
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 05:10 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Run Forrest RUN!!!



A base closure is different from a displacement. PERIOD end of story.

When they closed the 747 in ORD there were no more 747's in ORD. Pilots were no longer able to bid the 747 in ORD.

They are getting ready to close the 76T base in Denver too. There will not be anymore 757's or 767's based out of DEN. No pilot will be able to hold or bid a 757 in DEN. That will not be a displacement, it will be a base closure.

They are not closing the 737 base in IAH. There will still be 737's based in IAH. There will still be pilots who can bid the 737 in IAH. See the difference?

Do y'all need a picture drawn in crayon or is it perfectly clear now?
A base closure is covered and listed in the contract. 8-H-3. Under 8-H-3-a(1) it states the displacement process shall be used. So MOU 11 and 14 are special carve outs given to those pilots.
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 05:17 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
Not the feedback I receive from the first officers I fly with. Of course, I don't solicit garbage either. What a stupid conversation to have. So many things to talk about us vs. them not being one of them.

Dear Lord,

With You and St. Christopher by my side, please protect me from the divisive dolts who (spread hate within our ranks and pardon those who cross the line both in fact and in kind.) May we embrace our new collective group as an undivided force against the powers of an obvious inept mgt team and stooges located in IAH who cannot see the reality of what a unified group can and will achieve. And for those that are displaced may they one day regain their positions when their seniority allows it.

Amen.
I don't bring it up either. In fact I am surprised they say it as almost all of my LUAL F/O's have been great.
Now, maybe you should ask rp2pilot why he and his F/O buddies are talking about the JR. IAH capts. (Since he brought it up) On what must be time off. Work, work, work.
Reply
Old 05-21-2015 | 05:22 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Well Knotcher...Hoss is asking. Do you need a crayon drawing? Closure = Closure. Displacement = Displacement. Apples. Oranges. Got it?

Sled
Look at 8-H-3 in the UPA...Closing a Base. Just under there it list 8-H-3-a (1) the displacement process shall be utilized. The contact uses the same process described in 8-E regardless if you are displaced because your base closed.
The 747 special deal was a carve out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kasserine06
Military
25
03-20-2009 03:04 AM
MaydayMark
Cargo
2
03-11-2009 11:04 AM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
Chris
Flight Schools and Training
14
12-21-2008 03:08 AM
Airsupport
Regional
14
09-12-2008 08:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices