![]() |
It's a fluid industry and change is constant. Plans are cast in oatmeal. The only things that don't change are stupidity and avarice.
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 2269781)
APC Quicktakes says that UAL is planning on hiring 450 next year. Is that down from previous forecasts?
I don't know what APC Quicktakes is, but I'd go with Bill's number. |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 2269781)
APC Quicktakes says that UAL is planning on hiring 450 next year. Is that down from previous forecasts? And if so, why? What's going on?
https://www.airlinepilothiring.net/I...etirements.jpg Everything else is subject to revision. |
Where are the new hires being based and what a/c?
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 2269790)
It's a fluid industry and change is constant. Plans are cast in oatmeal. The only things that don't change are stupidity and avarice.
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 2269802)
Bill Kennedy said ~650 pilots to be hired in 2017. He made that statement on 8 November.
I don't know what APC Quicktakes is, but I'd go with Bill's number.
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2269818)
This is what's going on:
https://www.airlinepilothiring.net/I...etirements.jpg Everything else is subject to revision. Ok. Just making sure there wasn't some dire economic report coming out that was changing the big wigs forecasts, or something. Thanks! :D |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 2269781)
Hey fellas,
APC Quicktakes says that UAL is planning on hiring 450 next year. Is that down from previous forecasts? And if so, why? What's going on? |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 2269898)
But but but but........Oscar said by 2018 we were gonna have 17,000 pilots and 900 air frames on the property? Wa'happen?
I always seem to figure stuff out, AFTER the fact. :D |
Originally Posted by whereRwe
(Post 2269889)
Where are the new hires being based and what a/c?
|
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 2269901)
In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a Delta guy and we've got a bid closing tomorrow. I don't want to make a mistake and be stuck on the bottom of a list for years if there is information out there to warn me now.
I always seem to figure stuff out, AFTER the fact. :D |
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2269818)
This is what's going on:
https://www.airlinepilothiring.net/I...etirements.jpg Everything else is subject to revision. I'd like to see the company come out with a better explanation of why the hiring has deceased (TK issues?) and how we're going to end with 5000-6000 more pilot's (buy a another airline). |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2269770)
If you call/email BK, he WILL tell you to list EVERYTHING. You're NOT shooting yourself in that foot.....
Stage checks, phase checks, whatever. I don't think they care about things 13 years ago, it's more about airline history, if you've been in the Airlines for years multiple types, upgrade etc etc and no busts it's hard to imagine them weighing that against lazy eights etc. Stage checks are a little unfair in my opinion as a part 61 guy won't have any of those only FAA checkrides. Still will list though of course. |
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2270049)
I agree I am putting everything I can, hard to say if I did or didn't according to my logbook because I could easily have had a fill in instructor, doesn't say stage check. I'm trying to get my student record from school but it's been 13 years ha.
I don't think they care about things 13 years ago, it's more about airline history, if you've been in the Airlines for years multiple types, upgrade etc etc and no busts it's hard to imagine them weighing that against lazy eights etc. Stage checks are a little unfair in my opinion as a part 61 guy won't have any of those only FAA checkrides. Still will list though of course. |
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
(Post 2270046)
So, what exactly does that imply? Those retirement numbers haven't changed from the last few hiring "projections", yet the hiring projections still decrease. And the total end number "rumors" of 17000 to 18500 by 2020 are still out there.
I'd like to see the company come out with a better explanation of why the hiring has deceased (TK issues?) and how we're going to end with 5000-6000 more pilot's (buy a another airline). Sled |
Originally Posted by Grumble
(Post 2270054)
What you think, and your opinion means Richard. If they ask for it, list it. Your ENTIRE history, not just what you feel is fair.
|
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
(Post 2270046)
So, what exactly does that imply? Those retirement numbers haven't changed from the last few hiring "projections", yet the hiring projections still decrease. And the total end number "rumors" of 17000 to 18500 by 2020 are still out there.
I'd like to see the company come out with a better explanation of why the hiring has deceased (TK issues?) and how we're going to end with 5000-6000 more pilot's (buy a another airline). Where they go with those numbers is subject to change. We could match retirements, or double retirements, or not hire another pilot. In my short time here I've seen those numbers swing around so much I don't even bother trying to forecast future hiring, because obviously that is a moving target (particularly with the recent major changes in fleet plans and those at the top who make the decisions). Whatever target number was said in the past (17k or whatever) is ancient history, just like the 65 737-700s. Who knows what the plan is now? |
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
(Post 2270046)
So, what exactly does that imply? Those retirement numbers haven't changed from the last few hiring "projections", yet the hiring projections still decrease. And the total end number "rumors" of 17000 to 18500 by 2020 are still out there.
I'd like to see the company come out with a better explanation of why the hiring has deceased (TK issues?) and how we're going to end with 5000-6000 more pilot's (buy a another airline). When you see sims sitting around empty, or being leased out to third parties, then we can worry. As far as the 17k+ numbers... I think everyone is in agreement, regardless of your tin foil hat size, the only way to get there is to buy someone. |
Yeah winston and grumble, that's kind of what I thought you meant. Thanks for the reply. With all the ups and downs, it just leaves everyone guessing and wondering.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2270064)
Might have something to do with the fact that 61- 737s have been indefinitely deferred. Don't you think? Deliveries were to start in 2017. No planes...no pilots.
Sled |
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2270049)
I agree I am putting everything I can, hard to say if I did or didn't according to my logbook because I could easily have had a fill in instructor, doesn't say stage check. I'm trying to get my student record from school but it's been 13 years ha.
I don't think they care about things 13 years ago, it's more about airline history, if you've been in the Airlines for years multiple types, upgrade etc etc and no busts it's hard to imagine them weighing that against lazy eights etc. Stage checks are a little unfair in my opinion as a part 61 guy won't have any of those only FAA checkrides. Still will list though of course. But it's cool, don't take my word for it..... |
Last weeks FOU stated they were going to get more utilization out of our current narrowbody's for 2017 fwiw.
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2270305)
Sorry, but you're not correct. As mentioned, call/email BK and ask him YOURSELF.
But it's cool, don't take my word for it..... |
As stated several pages ago, the reading comprehension of some of these guys is next to nil. Some people just love arguing and always being right.
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2270350)
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about, I agree with you list everything. When I said I don't think they care I meant list it but I don't think that would kill your chances of getting a interview.
|
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2270350)
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about, I agree with you list everything. When I said I don't think they care I meant list it but I don't think that would kill your chances of getting a interview.
Originally Posted by Squallrider
(Post 2270049)
I don't think they care about things 13 years ago, it's more about airline history, if you've been in the Airlines for years multiple types, upgrade etc etc and no busts it's hard to imagine them weighing that against lazy eights etc
However, if there is a fail/unsat, that have you listed on your app and the CA interviewing you uses the tactic on his opening salvo of "so, you had a fail/unsat early on, tell me what happened?" If you say something like "well, that was 13 years ago, all you should care about is airline stuff and airline history". Then it MOST CERTAINLY DOES MATTER. |
Originally Posted by Paperboi
(Post 2270389)
As stated several pages ago, the reading comprehension of some of these guys is next to nil. Some people just love arguing and always being right.
|
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2270586)
Ok, sorry, my bad. Let me rephrase;
Will it stop you from being selected for interview? Nope, not one bit. IN FACT, it's pretty amazing what some people do have that still get an interview. However, if there is a fail/unsat, that have you listed on your app and the CA interviewing you uses the tactic on his opening salvo of "so, you had a fail/unsat early on, tell me what happened?" If you say something like "well, that was 13 years ago, all you should care about is airline stuff and airline history". Then it MOST CERTAINLY DOES MATTER. |
No sir it is not I can assure you. I just gave up patience with what is lost in translation on these message boards. If I'm lucky enough to sling gear for you at United one day you'd see different. Happy New Year.
QUOTE=Airhoss;2270796]And as stated previously if your attitude in real time is anything like your online attitude you are going to have a very rough time in an interview.[/QUOTE] |
Best of luck to you boi....
Nothing was lost in translation or reading comprehension. If you were to walk into an interview and state that you had "3 or maybe 4" check ride failures you are already done. You need to present solid factual information and have the ability to speak to those failures. I will be sure and take you off of my "help that guy out" list... |
Good Luck with more than 2 checkride failures....
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 2271038)
Best of luck to you boi....
Nothing was lost in translation or reading comprehension. If you were to walk into an interview and state that you had "3 or maybe 4" check ride failures you are already done. You need to present solid factual information and have the ability to speak to those failures. I will be sure and take you off of my "help that guy out" list... |
Not sure if this is already posted but in case it wasn't, I just noticed this on flying together.
Updated 12/29 January 10, 2017 January 24, 2017 February 7, 2017 February 14, 2017 February 21, 2017 March 7, 2017 March 14, 2017 March 21, 2017 April 4, 2017 April 11, 2017 April 25, 2017 |
Wow that added some classes. Good news!
|
Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
(Post 2271889)
Wow that added some classes. Good news!
|
Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer
(Post 2271889)
Wow that added some classes. Good news!
|
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 2271974)
There's only 4 guys per class.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by detpilot
(Post 2272015)
Well here's hoping for 26 girls per class then! 😆
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk ^^^^ For the Win^^^^ |
I'll wear a dress and heels if that's what it takes!
|
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 2271974)
There's only 4 guys per class.
|
Originally Posted by Dedi
(Post 2272707)
Is that what you've heard or has it been posted somewhere? Of course, I could be missing sarcasm if that's what was intended :@
|
Originally Posted by Dedi
(Post 2272707)
Is that what you've heard or has it been posted somewhere? Of course, I could be missing sarcasm if that's what was intended :@
Yes it is twue! |
Originally Posted by Dedi
(Post 2272707)
Is that what you've heard or has it been posted somewhere? Of course, I could be missing sarcasm if that's what was intended :@
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands