Search
Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2014, 08:55 PM
  #7601  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
I dont know man...the arbitration didnt address the minimum reserve staffing that is set on the grid. This month minimum staffing for reserves was insane, like 15 a day in DFW. Next month it is around 5 a day.

It seems like, for whatever reason, the company may be using "historical staffing numbers" as the contract requires.

Either way, I dont care if it was a magical unicorn that got it done, its done.
Where in the contract does it address "historical" numbers? I did a word search and the only time "historical" appears is in the lodging part of section 5.

In section 25, it says the company uses its "experience". Now you know why it's screwy.
Awesome...word search. Semantics.

"Based on it's experience" and "historical staffing". It's the same because both language is weak.

It's weak like our 5 days off and red/green without mentioning black. We can't even get clarification on what "high speed internet" is.
The Juice is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 12:25 AM
  #7602  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
Awesome...word search. Semantics.

"Based on it's experience" and "historical staffing". It's the same because both language is weak.

It's weak like our 5 days off and red/green without mentioning black. We can't even get clarification on what "high speed internet" is.

No what's "awsome" is the fact that words do mean things. I quoted the contract. "Historical staffing" isn't found in the contract, "experience" is found in the contract.

The language is not weak. "Experience" is exact, it has a definition: (from Blacks Law Dictionary)

EXPERIENCE
1. Time spent learning a skill or field of knowledge. Superior understanding or mastery gained by actual practice acquired over months or years. 2. Known also as tenure

"maybe", "should", "possibly", "to the maximum extent possible" - these are weak.

We probably are on the same page, You say the language is weak and I'm saying that the language doesn't support the idea that most people think it supports. The language isn't weak, it is simply inapplicable.

For that matter, why are "red day" and "green day" not found in the definitions section?
skybolt is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 11:04 AM
  #7603  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt View Post
No what's "awsome" is the fact that words do mean things. I quoted the contract. "Historical staffing" isn't found in the contract, "experience" is found in the contract.

The language is not weak. "Experience" is exact, it has a definition: (from Blacks Law Dictionary)

EXPERIENCE
1. Time spent learning a skill or field of knowledge. Superior understanding or mastery gained by actual practice acquired over months or years. 2. Known also as tenure

"maybe", "should", "possibly", "to the maximum extent possible" - these are weak.

We probably are on the same page, You say the language is weak and I'm saying that the language doesn't support the idea that most people think it supports. The language isn't weak, it is simply inapplicable.

For that matter, why are "red day" and "green day" not found in the definitions section?
The language was written for a specific purpose, and since it is "inapplicable" I would consider it weak. It isn't fulfilling the purpose the brain-trust meant when writing / accepting the verbiage. The effects of "inapplicable" and "to the greatest extent possible" are the same -whatever the company feels like doing at the time.
Plane Ramrod is offline  
Old 07-22-2014, 02:24 PM
  #7604  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod View Post
The language was written for a specific purpose, and since it is "inapplicable" I would consider it weak. It isn't fulfilling the purpose the brain-trust meant when writing / accepting the verbiage. The effects of "inapplicable" and "to the greatest extent possible" are the same -whatever the company feels like doing at the time.
Can we all agree that the language just does not work? A quick read of the arbitors opinion will show that he also judged the language unworkable
skybolt is offline  
Old 07-24-2014, 07:24 AM
  #7605  
Line Holder
 
GoMountaineers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: A320
Posts: 90
Default

Can someone please PM me about bidding floating vacation.
GoMountaineers is offline  
Old 07-26-2014, 06:32 AM
  #7606  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PikeAV8R's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus
Posts: 213
Default

Does anyone have a current order/ return schedule for our planes? I had one from about a year ago, but they have since pulled a few orders forward and changed 20 320s to 321s.
PikeAV8R is offline  
Old 07-26-2014, 06:53 AM
  #7607  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
Default

628 here. Not much time for rest after delivery, already in the system.
Terrain Inop is offline  
Old 07-26-2014, 07:01 AM
  #7608  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 549
Default

Originally Posted by PikeAV8R View Post
Does anyone have a current order/ return schedule for our planes? I had one from about a year ago, but they have since pulled a few orders forward and changed 20 320s to 321s.
The investor relations section of the spirit.com site appears up-to-date; shows the converted 321s and 319 lease expirations.
gatorbird is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 06:01 PM
  #7609  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PikeAV8R's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus
Posts: 213
Default

I found it, thanks for the directions. That chart was exactly what I was looking for, my previous one was out of date.
PikeAV8R is offline  
Old 07-29-2014, 03:59 AM
  #7610  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gringo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Under the Frog
Posts: 1,125
Default Must be doing something right!

Spirit Airlines Q2 Beats Street On EPS And Revenues; Shares up More Than 3% Early

7/29/14, 7:23
06:23 AM EDT, 07/29/2014 (MT Newswires) -- Spirit Airlines (SAVE) has reported Q2 earnings per share and revenues that beat the Street view, driven by growth in flight volume, higher load factors, and higher operating yields.

Adjusted EPS of $0.91 was up from $0.63 in Q2 2013 and beat analyst estimates of $0.90. Total operating revenue was $499.3 million, up from $407.33 million in Q2 2013 and surpassing analyst projections of $498.74 million.

"While growing our capacity 17.2% year over year, we grew our top line 22.6% year over year," said Ben Baldanza, Spirit's Chief Executive Officer. "Our efforts to drive operational excellence have produced material improvements in controllable components of our cost structure which contributed to the 3.5 percentage point year-over-year increase in our Adjusted Operating Margin."

Shares of SAVE are up $2.46, or 3.63%, at $70.18 in early pre-market trading within a range of $29.65 - $68.95.

Price: 70.18, Change: +2.46, Percent Change: +3.63
gringo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices