Lean November schedule
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
Well if all the Aviate hires are finally on the way out the door at AW, that’s not a good sign for longevity purposes of the UA contract. That contract is the only thing keeping the doors open atm (hopefully you can get some cargo contracts). This company has strong Compass vibes.
Last edited by KirillTheThrill; 10-19-2021 at 09:28 PM.
#3
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 52
Well if all the Aviate hires are finally on the way out the door at AW, that’s not a good sign for longevity purposes of the UA contract. That contract is the only thing keeping the doors open atm (hopefully you can get some cargo contracts). This company has strong Compass vibes.
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
The union says we had to send back a couple versions of the schedule to UA because we didn't have the staff for them. I'm lead to believe that we are losing a lot of captains and therefore have significant restrains on our staffing. It's good for AW pilots who are in Aviate but remains to be seen what it will mean for AW itself.
#5
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
2) AW flies only for united
3) United has said it sees no role for 50 seat, single class aircraft going forward
4) AW now has functionally-significant staffing problems in the setting of accelerating major airline hiring
Yes the outcome remains to be seen but it’s not hard to predict
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
1) AW flies only 50 seat, single class aircraft
2) AW flies only for united
3) United has said it sees no role for 50 seat, single class aircraft going forward
4) AW now has functionally-significant staffing problems in the setting of accelerating major airline hiring
Yes the outcome remains to be seen but it’s not hard to predict
2) AW flies only for united
3) United has said it sees no role for 50 seat, single class aircraft going forward
4) AW now has functionally-significant staffing problems in the setting of accelerating major airline hiring
Yes the outcome remains to be seen but it’s not hard to predict
But yes, it is a challenging place for the owners to be in.
#7
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thepoin...view-iata/amp/
I’ll stand by #3, especially wrt single-class 50 seat. As vague as corporate “we have no plans to XXX” normally is … kirby lays out all the dots here and says we don’t want to connect them but we might have no choice
even if you charitably assume some continued role for the 200/145… which carrier wins that musical chairs game.
I’ll stand by #3, especially wrt single-class 50 seat. As vague as corporate “we have no plans to XXX” normally is … kirby lays out all the dots here and says we don’t want to connect them but we might have no choice
even if you charitably assume some continued role for the 200/145… which carrier wins that musical chairs game.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,218
The bulk of the 50 seat flying will be the 550’s. The scary part about working for Air Wisconsin is that the flying that you guys do is where they are sending the 550. There will be a few single class 50 seaters running around to small Midwest towns, but I’d expect the more densely populated areas that you guys fly to increase in gauge and eliminate the 200’s. UAX is going to shrink significantly unless a modern 50 seat replacement that is scope compliant enters production soon. The best hope for Air Wisconsin is that GoJet gives up and you guys end up with the 550’s. That’s a risky gamble when both Mesa and SkyWest have 700 training programs in place and SkyWest is facing the same threat with the future of their 200’s. The record hiring at all of the legacies is going to hit the regionals really hard. I’m guessing that the smaller companies are either eliminated, or get merged into the bigger ones. Either way, the next few years are going to be a wild ride.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,218
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thepoin...view-iata/amp/
I’ll stand by #3, especially wrt single-class 50 seat. As vague as corporate “we have no plans to XXX” normally is … kirby lays out all the dots here and says we don’t want to connect them but we might have no choice
even if you charitably assume some continued role for the 200/145… which carrier wins that musical chairs game.
I’ll stand by #3, especially wrt single-class 50 seat. As vague as corporate “we have no plans to XXX” normally is … kirby lays out all the dots here and says we don’t want to connect them but we might have no choice
even if you charitably assume some continued role for the 200/145… which carrier wins that musical chairs game.
#10
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
It’s not a false equation, and I’ve moved on from SkyWest btw. You have the oldest 200’s in the United fleet, oil prices increasing daily, we started poaching your aviate hires at UA (why now?). Compass was in a better position to grab flying before they shut down, that’s a fact.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post