Search

Notices

What's the Plan?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2017 | 12:50 AM
  #51  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EA CO AS
Speaking of business decisions, it occurs to me that management's decision to seek pay rates that were less than the Big Four was actually in the best interest of the business, and also the pilots....

This results in stagnant growth, meaning fewer upgrade opportunities or even poor job security if the company had to resort to cutbacks. ...
This is some Grade A Stockholm Syndrome propaganda you're pushing right here.

"I only beat you because it's good for you, baby."

PAH-LEEEZE. You're not offering any guarantees that low costs and sacrificed pay will translate into growth. After all, ALK management loves to beat their chests about that industry leading profit margin, and growth plans will surely cut into that bar graph. Crew pay constitutes less than 8% of total operational costs, but yet you pretend that the entire airline hinges on the cost of the pilots. By the way, this has been a spectacular diversion from the original point of "What's the plan?" With the projected 737 deliveries and the anticipated loss of the Airbus fleet, ALK is looking at a net loss of aircraft over the next decade.

You don't have to be a business major to use addition.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 12:57 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Captain B-737
Default

Originally Posted by beancounter
If Alaska can't afford to pay it's pilots industry standard pay then it's already game over. I don't think you grasp the situation Alaska is in with the start of the biggest hiring boom we've ever seen. Let's say hypothetically that in a year or two Delta decides it's taking too long to kill Alaska in Seattle and they want to quicken the pace. They simply offer jobs to any Alaska pilots that want them, no interviews. Alaska would lose so many pilots they wouldn't be able to train them fast enough, the operation would meltdown, and the cash would start getting burned through. It already happened on a small scale at Horizon. AA alone is hiring 900 pilots next year and the year after and the year after.......Delta will probably hire more than that with their higher level of expansion. How many total pilots does Alaska have? How many with only a couple years invested in the Air Group? Are you grasping any of this?
That’s the gamble Brad and Ben made...and?... What are you going to do about it? If they want to risk the future of Alaska Airlines, that’s their perogative I guess. I’d be far more worried about the effects of spending 4 Billion on VX than I would be about Delta’s hiring practices BTW.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 06:12 AM
  #53  
GearBoy's Avatar
missionary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Right seat 787 or missionary
Default Soon to be No. 6

I was riding the hotel van, the other day, on the way to the airport. I struck up a conversation with a Spirit captain. I asked about their negotiations. He told me that Spirit recently offered their pilots:

~$264 AND PBS.

Of course, I do not know if this is true and even if so it is an over-simplification of their negotiations. But, if the pay number is correct and comes to fruition, Alaska could soon be number 6.

If Spirit gets $264, what does JetBlue get? Who's next?

I believe the Alaska Mechanics have a clause that keeps them at, I believe, the third highest in their peer group. If someone else gets a raise, knocking them down from 3rd, there's some kind of adjustment. The rub is in who is included in that peer group.

When Doug Parker addressed the American pilot's initial request to re-open pay negotiations in light of gains at Delta and United, he responded that the American pilots were among the first in the negotiation cycle and that they raised the bar for everyone who followed and that they would lead the way again with their next negotiations. The point being, even Doug Parker, Mr. East vs. West, knows that successive negotiations are going to raise the bar, unless of course you are someplace like Alaska where you start off at 5th, only to finish lower.

You guys keep talking only hourly pay. What a pilot makes is not his hourly pay. What a pilot makes is what his W-2 says at the end of the year. That W-2 is a more valid comparison. That W-2 is a function of hourly pay AND work rules.

Bottom, line even if you Alaska guys were paid Delta wages, you'd still be cheaper because of your inferior work rules. You are more productive and Alaska gets by with fewer pilots, working more for straight time. Every new-hire or upgrade you prevent by working so productively, saves Alaska hundreds of thousands of dollar$ each.

While you guys work more for less, WN can still drop to 0, pick up all Premium, or take the month off, still has trips touching, and the best scope in the industry. Delta has Green slips and profit sharing out the wazoo, All the while, Alaska can't drop below 75 and is working on their days off and vacation for straight time to make less with little or no quality of life, and BM & BT continue buy back billion$ in stock, offer themselves others countless $tock option$, pay dividend$ and spend billion$ on another airline, all on the back of your front-line employees.

So, my question is this. Since you are seemingly happy with no. 5. what happens if and when you guys and gals become number 6 or number 7?

just curious-

Will the on-time and completions still be in the 90's?

My Magic 8 Ball says yes.

Speaking of no. 8, that can't be far behind. It comes after 7, which comes after 6, which comes after 5.....

good luck and be safe out there. take care of one another; because, if you don't no one else will. the cooch is not on your side.


.

Last edited by GearBoy; 11-21-2017 at 06:40 AM.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 06:25 AM
  #54  
GearBoy's Avatar
missionary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Right seat 787 or missionary
Default It's not too late to slash some tires

Originally Posted by pete2800
Dude, most of us get it. We're trying. We're still suffering from the effects of incompetence in the past, which is why we have ended up working under contracts that have been impacted by arbitration in a significant way. I recently flew with a guy who didn't have a problem with the idea of the company outsourcing E190's or similar sized airplanes. Every time we have a mandatory retirement, our pilot group's stance on scope becomes more united. The more regional pilots they hire, and the more retirements we have, the more things will improve. Things take time, though. The mistakes of negotiations past are still very present.
By saying past negotiations, one seems to blame only the Union. They are copiable, especially for being too conciliatory. But, I say again:

The Union is not the Negotiating Committee, the MEC or even National. The Union is the pilot in the seat next to you.

If during negotiations, that pilot is flying Premium, selling back vacation or picking-up Open Time, you are doomed to fail.

ARBITRATION OR NOT

The only thing your company understands is canceled & delayed flights.

End of story-
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 06:31 AM
  #55  
GearBoy's Avatar
missionary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Right seat 787 or missionary
Default It's never too late to slash some tires

Originally Posted by pete2800
Dude, most of us get it. We're trying. We're still suffering from the effects of incompetence in the past, which is why we have ended up working under contracts that have been impacted by arbitration in a significant way. I recently flew with a guy who didn't have a problem with the idea of the company outsourcing E190's or similar sized airplanes. Every time we have a mandatory retirement, our pilot group's stance on scope becomes more united. The more regional pilots they hire, and the more retirements we have, the more things will improve. Things take time, though. The mistakes of negotiations past are still very present.
By saying past negotiations, one seems to blame only the Union. They are copiable, especially for being too conciliatory. But, I say again:

The Union is not the Negotiating Committee, The MEC or even National. The Union is the pilot in the seat next to you.

If during negotiations, that pilot is flying Premium, selling back vacation or picking-up Open Time, you are doomed to fail.

ARBITRATION OR NOT

End of story-
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 09:56 AM
  #56  
beancounter's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 393
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
That’s the gamble Brad and Ben made...and?... What are you going to do about it? If they want to risk the future of Alaska Airlines, that’s their perogative I guess. I’d be far more worried about the effects of spending 4 Billion on VX than I would be about Delta’s hiring practices BTW.
It's all interlinked. Why do you think Alaska Air Group would obscenely over pay for VX? It's to make Alaska less vulnerable to Delta's long term Seattle plans.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 12:01 PM
  #57  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GearBoy
By saying past negotiations, one seems to blame only the Union. They are copiable, especially for being too conciliatory. But, I say again:

The Union is not the Negotiating Committee, The MEC or even National. The Union is the pilot in the seat next to you.

If during negotiations, that pilot is flying Premium, selling back vacation or picking-up Open Time, you are doomed to fail.

ARBITRATION OR NOT

End of story-
I don't think we're disagreeing.

Weak pilots make a weak pilot group which makes for weak negotiations and a weak contract.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 12:54 PM
  #58  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by GearBoy
BM & BT continue buy back billion$ in stock, offer themselves others countless $tock option$, pay dividend$ and spend billion$ on another airline, all on the back of your front-line employees.
You hit the nail on the head there, Gear Boy. Too bad it was stuck in the middle of your post. All anyone has to do is look back over the years and see how much money AS has spent on stock buybacks.

Then ask yourself, "Who are the largest individual holders of Alaska stocks." It doesn't take much research to find out how many stock options the senior managers get as part of their compensation packages.

And you're still are buying the Alaska "We are family" B.S.?

I, for one, am glad to see the radicalization of the new generation of AS pilots. The 92% mentality should have gone away long ago.
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 02:58 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800



Weak pilots make a weak pilot group which makes for weak negotiations and a weak contract.



I’m glad most Alaska pilots get this now
Reply
Old 11-21-2017 | 11:40 PM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by beancounter
It's all interlinked. Why do you think Alaska Air Group would obscenely over pay for VX? It's to make Alaska less vulnerable to Delta's long term Seattle plans.
Ironically if Alaska Air Group would have just agreed to guarantee Delta the feed it needed via code share to build a Far East hub out of Seattle, they'd probably have grown by 30% over the last few years as Delta became increasingly reliant on AK's feed. Instead they said shove off and the race is on to build a hub suitable to feed international from SEA. Probably works for mgmt's interest, but the pilots.... time will tell.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gcsass
Cargo
37
03-06-2014 09:49 AM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
10
11-07-2011 01:07 PM
Cardinal
Major
0
11-04-2006 11:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices