Search

Notices

What's the Plan?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2017 | 11:22 AM
  #61  
RSA 4 Life
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: J-3 Front AND Back
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Ironically if Alaska Air Group would have just agreed to guarantee Delta the feed it needed via code share to build a Far East hub out of Seattle, they'd probably have grown by 30% over the last few years as Delta became increasingly reliant on AK's feed. Instead they said shove off and the race is on to build a hub suitable to feed international from SEA. Probably works for mgmt's interest, but the pilots.... time will tell.
Neat speculation. Does not matter moving forward.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 12:43 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by Nick1984
Neat speculation. Does not matter moving forward.
Ture dat.....

Best of luck in 2020 and I hope that AK pilots become the best paid 737 pilots in the world!
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 03:24 PM
  #63  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Ironically if Alaska Air Group would have just agreed to guarantee Delta the feed it needed via code share to build a Far East hub out of Seattle, they'd probably have grown by 30% over the last few years as Delta became increasingly reliant on AK's feed. Instead they said shove off and the race is on to build a hub suitable to feed international from SEA. Probably works for mgmt's interest, but the pilots.... time will tell.
Given the amount of revenue coming in via codeshares and partnerships at that time (keep in mind, DL demanded AS sever ALL their codeshare and partner relationships and remain solely wedded to DL) the ask from DL was one that only benefited them, and would have made AS far more vulnerable to no longer being a standalone entity long-term.

While the DL relationship is now over, the organic growth alone at AS since DL entered the SEA market as a full-fledged hub operation has more than offset the loss of the DL revenue, and AS has added other partners since then, making Mileage Plan more attractive, not less.

I'd suggest that all that growth is in the best interest of everyone, pilots included. But that's just me...
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 03:33 PM
  #64  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EA CO AS
Given the amount of revenue coming in via codeshares and partnerships at that time (keep in mind, DL demanded AS sever ALL their codeshare and partner relationships and remain solely wedded to DL) the ask from DL was one that only benefited them, and would have made AS far more vulnerable to no longer being a standalone entity long-term.

While the DL relationship is now over, the organic growth alone at AS since DL entered the SEA market as a full-fledged hub operation has more than offset the loss of the DL revenue, and AS has added other partners since then, making Mileage Plan more attractive, not less.

I'd suggest that all that growth is in the best interest of everyone, pilots included. But that's just me...
Yeah, you'd be right except for that most of the growth has been with sub-contracted regional jets operated by Skywest, because the company has fought tooth-and-nail against any contractual language oriented around job security for pilots.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 07:00 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Q400, B-737
Default

But that helps AAG’s bottom line, doesn’t it? And not us.

When we get to that point, just remember one thing: he who dares, wins.
And if you’re not willing to burn the place to the ground, you lose.

Because management is willing, and they assume we’re chumps.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 07:15 PM
  #66  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by N19906
if you’re not willing to burn the place to the ground, you lose.
So does every one of your non-pilot co-workers as well; are you saying you're ok with putting thousands of people out of work in the name of saying, "Ha! I sure showed you guys!" to Brad and Ben?
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 07:28 PM
  #67  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by N19906
But that helps AAG’s bottom line, doesn’t it? And not us.
I always thought that anything that helped AAG ultimately helped the employees as well, especially considering how many employees 401(k) plans involve AAG stock.

As much as I love working for AS, I'd also like to retire someday, and an "I'll burn this place down!" mentality doesn't help advance career stability for our co-workers. Or our customers, for that matter.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 07:55 PM
  #68  
NotTellin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: Upright & Breathing
Default

Why do you guys continue to engage a non pilot management shill? One that created there APC account less than a month ago! If you ignore them they will go away.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 08:40 PM
  #69  
beancounter's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 393
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Ironically if Alaska Air Group would have just agreed to guarantee Delta the feed it needed via code share to build a Far East hub out of Seattle, they'd probably have grown by 30% over the last few years as Delta became increasingly reliant on AK's feed. Instead they said shove off and the race is on to build a hub suitable to feed international from SEA. Probably works for mgmt's interest, but the pilots.... time will tell.
That wasn't Delta's only request. They also wanted Alaska to drop the codeshare with American.
Reply
Old 11-22-2017 | 10:20 PM
  #70  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EA CO AS
So does every one of your non-pilot co-workers as well; are you saying you're ok with putting thousands of people out of work in the name of saying, "Ha! I sure showed you guys!" to Brad and Ben?
The capacity will be flown. If not by one carrier, then by another. There will be jobs, and if the company that was paying less than the average is the one that suffers, then those jobs will be better as a result.

If the lower-paying companies are eliminated, the average compensation goes up. This is good for labor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gcsass
Cargo
37
03-06-2014 09:49 AM
shoelu
Major
24
12-21-2011 12:20 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
10
11-07-2011 01:07 PM
Cardinal
Major
0
11-04-2006 11:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices