Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
SLI reality check fo VX >

SLI reality check fo VX

Search

Notices

SLI reality check fo VX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2018 | 03:12 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by busbusbaby
I won’t go into the details because it is way to long but there were never any merit upgrades at VX, it had to do with something those pilots agreed to per their job offer. It was arbitrated and nothing changed.
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 05:36 PM
  #102  
Ispeakjive's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Ideally, QOL wrt to bidding will degrade as little as possible for anyone affected. Should a 10 year 737 FO now upgrade to the number 1 CA on the bus? Of course not.
Try this: "We're all in this together. I hope it works out as best as possible for all". Or: "You're going to get hosed. Haha".
One view point makes you a useless POS, like Mea25000. The other makes you human.
The fat lady will eventually sing and we'll have our answer. It should not take superpowers to be nice to one another.
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 05:44 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
DOH is a no go for many VX folks since according to some on this forum, 98% of them would have bypassed a job offer with Alaskan Airways and wanted nothing to do with the eskimo. The only way a 9 year guy will be next to a 30 year guy will be "starting engine #......".
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 06:58 PM
  #104  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Explain to me how this makes any sense as an Alaska pilot with 30 years starts at seniority 100, while #1 has 39. W T F?
Reply
Old 02-01-2018 | 07:17 PM
  #105  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Tailstand
Explain to me how this makes any sense as an Alaska pilot with 30 years starts at seniority 100, while #1 has 39. W T F?
I would suggest that a person read the AA and UA awards and then expect a solution that strongly reflects something between those two outcomes.

I sincerely hope Alaska & Virgin have strong analysis capabilities—clearing showing data without cherry picking will pay dividends in the long-term. There will be less suicides this way.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 06:47 AM
  #106  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tailstand
Explain to me how this makes any sense as an Alaska pilot with 30 years starts at seniority 100, while #1 has 39. W T F?
I probably wasn't very clear. My point was VX ALPA allowed VX pilots to upgrade out of seniority. The 30 year 9 year was a generalization. Our top guys are 30+ years. Our seniority has always been based on DOH. So whats wrong with using DOH as the gold standard. Having pilots jump over 10+ years up the list is a windfall for that group.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 07:11 AM
  #107  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
I probably wasn't very clear. My point was VX ALPA allowed VX pilots to upgrade out of seniority. The 30 year 9 year was a generalization. Our top guys are 30+ years. Our seniority has always been based on DOH. So whats wrong with using DOH as the gold standard. Having pilots jump over 10+ years up the list is a windfall for that group.
Because AS years do not equal VX years. Many VX folks rolled the dice big time to work at a startup early on, the reward for that is a senior CA slot.

VX will not agree to DOH and the arbitrator will not award DOH, so why bother talking about it?
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 08:47 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
I probably wasn't very clear. My point was VX ALPA allowed VX pilots to upgrade out of seniority. The 30 year 9 year was a generalization. Our top guys are 30+ years. Our seniority has always been based on DOH. So whats wrong with using DOH as the gold standard. Having pilots jump over 10+ years up the list is a windfall for that group.
Are you talking about the restricted FOs? That took place long before ALPA was voted in at VX. And, like a previous poster said, it had to do with something those pilots agreed to when hired. Its been arbitrated and nothing changed.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 11:01 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GreatBigSea
Are you talking about the restricted FOs? That took place long before ALPA was voted in at VX. And, like a previous poster said, it had to do with something those pilots agreed to when hired. Its been arbitrated and nothing changed.
I give up it will be what it will be. Hope the arbitrator sees what each side brings to the table and accounts for that.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 04:22 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
DOH solves the problem. Plus its the gold standard.
Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Originally Posted by flywest
I probably wasn't very clear. My point was VX ALPA allowed VX pilots to upgrade out of seniority. The 30 year 9 year was a generalization. Our top guys are 30+ years. Our seniority has always been based on DOH. So whats wrong with using DOH as the gold standard. Having pilots jump over 10+ years up the list is a windfall for that group.
Bless your little misguided heart...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Major
122
04-22-2016 04:26 AM
jbravo65
Career Questions
60
12-04-2012 03:07 AM
keenster
Mergers and Acquisitions
1
11-27-2008 01:51 PM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
BigWatchPilot
Cargo
4
07-14-2007 05:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices