Seniority Proposals
#341
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 41
From: 765A
Maybe. Longshoremen and merchant Mariners don't give longevity credit to retired military who join their ranks.
Military culture is useful in airline aviation. Maybe give partial credit for the first ten years? After that you have to pick your poison... a 30 year O6 might be a more effective organizational leader and executive, but he doesn't bring three times the pilot skill or cultural value to the table compared to an O3.
Military culture is useful in airline aviation. Maybe give partial credit for the first ten years? After that you have to pick your poison... a 30 year O6 might be a more effective organizational leader and executive, but he doesn't bring three times the pilot skill or cultural value to the table compared to an O3.
#344
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Onward and upward
#345
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 4
From: MD-88 FO
Why does anyone bother engage these idiots? It’s obvious they haven’t read S-10s, SEC filings, the acquisition documents, the SLI transcripts, etc, etc. They’re just making crap up, or regurgitating rumors and nonsense they hear in cockpits as fact. For example, Iif you read the documents, Alaska approached VX first. Once VX’s board decided to sell, they went out and whipped up competition eventually gaining four more parties that drove the price up. They were hedge fund managers after all and knew the game.
The basic problem with some posters on here is that they are angry they aren’t guaranteed a windfall from AS acquiring VX. We are all just pilots flying from A to B and back. Whether your company makes a lot of money, acquires someone, merges, gets acquired, or fails, or gains routes and makes more money because someone else fails, it’s got NOTHING to do with you. Alaska did well for a long time. So what, it’s got nothing to do with how well the pilots flew. You didn't outfly the boys at Pan Am, TWA, etc. Alaska acquired VX, guess what, once again it had nothing to do with how well you flew. AND, get this, just because MANAGEMENT acquires someone doesn’t mean PILOTS get any benefits. A lot of guys on here seem to think there was something in this merger for them. Nope, your just a pilot. No different than a pilot whose company failed. Or who got acquired. ANY corporate level business decision could be good or bad for pilots. We are all just in it for the ride. That’s how a career as labor works. You want to make personal gains through corporate acquisitions, you’d best join management.
The basic problem with some posters on here is that they are angry they aren’t guaranteed a windfall from AS acquiring VX. We are all just pilots flying from A to B and back. Whether your company makes a lot of money, acquires someone, merges, gets acquired, or fails, or gains routes and makes more money because someone else fails, it’s got NOTHING to do with you. Alaska did well for a long time. So what, it’s got nothing to do with how well the pilots flew. You didn't outfly the boys at Pan Am, TWA, etc. Alaska acquired VX, guess what, once again it had nothing to do with how well you flew. AND, get this, just because MANAGEMENT acquires someone doesn’t mean PILOTS get any benefits. A lot of guys on here seem to think there was something in this merger for them. Nope, your just a pilot. No different than a pilot whose company failed. Or who got acquired. ANY corporate level business decision could be good or bad for pilots. We are all just in it for the ride. That’s how a career as labor works. You want to make personal gains through corporate acquisitions, you’d best join management.
#346
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
The “uneducated hack” refers the consensus of economists’ opinions on the use of the “gold standard” in financial matters, not anyone advocating for the use of DOH for SLI purposes. It specifically applies to Senator Ted Cruz who advocated for a return to the “Gold Standard” during the presidential debates. I just found the repeated use of the term itself ironic since, in it’s original meaning, it is widely discredited. Hardly trying to start a food fight over the SLI. As I said before, my only take on the SLI is that we all paid some pretty big assessments for legal representation and we should all switch our rallying cry to “Let the arbitrators do their jobs” My apologies if anyone thought I was calling them a hack.
Onward and upward
Onward and upward
#347
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Sorry, that was a rhetorical question... I already know you don't because Cape Air isn't a part 121 carrier.
#348
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 41
From: 765A
Yes I do know the difference. Do you? Most of Cape Air is Pt 135, but Cape Air operates under Pt 121 out of Guam flying ATRs. I specifically chose that example because they have both 135 and 121 ops.
#349
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
I was under the impression it was already shut down, but in any case it is shutting down shortly. I do, however, apologize for the oversight.
#350
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 41
From: 765A
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
14
06-26-2008 03:26 PM




