WN buying AS?
#101
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
I find it hilarious that Southwest is seriously looking at diversifying their fleet makeup via merger after the 737 MAX debacle. Meanwhile, Alaska can't get back to their "All Boeing" comfort zone fast enough.
The day AS starts returning the Airbusses en masse, (who are we kidding they're going straight to Delta) is the day that you can start the countdown clock on Alaska Airlines.
The day AS starts returning the Airbusses en masse, (who are we kidding they're going straight to Delta) is the day that you can start the countdown clock on Alaska Airlines.
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
I find it hilarious that Southwest is seriously looking at diversifying their fleet makeup via merger after the 737 MAX debacle. Meanwhile, Alaska can't get back to their "All Boeing" comfort zone fast enough.
The day AS starts returning the Airbusses en masse, (who are we kidding they're going straight to Delta) is the day that you can start the countdown clock on Alaska Airlines.
The day AS starts returning the Airbusses en masse, (who are we kidding they're going straight to Delta) is the day that you can start the countdown clock on Alaska Airlines.
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 331
WN is ensconced in their “All Boeing” comfort zone, and I don’t think that is going to change any time soon.
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 466
That’s what everyone here should be concerned about, because right now there’s nothing to stop it from happening.
#107
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 69
If air group wanted out of the Airbus fleet they would have canceled the last 2 NEO deliveries. Also, if they’re going to pay 25m per year to have multiple types and the NEO is going to be here for at least the next 12 years, then it stands to reason that an order for more NEO’s is imminent. Plus 220’s to fill the gap, flown by mainline, but that’s just my guess.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,176
If air group wanted out of the Airbus fleet they would have canceled the last 2 NEO deliveries. Also, if they’re going to pay 25m per year to have multiple types and the NEO is going to be here for at least the next 12 years, then it stands to reason that an order for more NEO’s is imminent. Plus 220’s to fill the gap, flown by mainline, but that’s just my guess.
😂😂😂
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Jet
Posts: 214
If air group wanted out of the Airbus fleet they would have canceled the last 2 NEO deliveries. Also, if they’re going to pay 25m per year to have multiple types and the NEO is going to be here for at least the next 12 years, then it stands to reason that an order for more NEO’s is imminent. Plus 220’s to fill the gap, flown by mainline, but that’s just my guess.
#110
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 71
If air group wanted out of the Airbus fleet they would have canceled the last 2 NEO deliveries. Also, if they’re going to pay 25m per year to have multiple types and the NEO is going to be here for at least the next 12 years, then it stands to reason that an order for more NEO’s is imminent. Plus 220’s to fill the gap, flown by mainline, but that’s just my guess.
They love the performance of the 321NEO, but once we get the MAX9 flying I think it’ll be further apparent there is no long-term need for the 321.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post