![]() |
Originally Posted by av8or
(Post 2977649)
just to clarify.... I didn’t mean THEIR workrules.... I meant the total $$$ package (they do make considerably more than us per days worked) PLUS proper workrules and scope
uhm I hate to break it to you but AMR is making only $12 more an hour for a 12 year captain, with no profit sharing, more expensive medical, and .5 percent better 401k.... careful what you wish for, I am confident we are already making more. I think your confused, people want to go to AMR for their W/B, not lackluster N/B rates. I want AMR’s retirements and widebodies, that’s it. They by far have the worst contract of any of the big 4. |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2977664)
uhm I hate to break it to you but AMR is making only $12 more an hour for a 12 year captain, with no profit sharing, more expensive medical, and .5 percent better 401k.... careful what you wish for, I am confident we are already making more.
I think your confused, people want to go to AMR for their W/B, not lackluster N/B rates. I want AMR’s retirements and widebodies, that’s it. They by far have the worst contract of any of the big 4. many QOL work rules need to be addressed. Along with better LTD and a few other things. I’m sure some will be fixed and some will remain the same once we get a contract (been in negotiations for a year now). FWIW on the APA forums most guys are negative (like all pilots) and assume that this will somehow reduce our narrowbody flights into Seattle. Hopefully it’s a win win for both sides. |
AMR profit sharing for 2019 was 1.4%
I am sure you will get many improvements in the coming contract. I just don’t want your current one, you must understand that. I hope this works out for everyone too, not just management. |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2977697)
AMR profit sharing for 2019 was 1.4%
I am sure you will get many improvements in the coming contract. I just don’t want your current one, you must understand that. I hope this works out for everyone too, not just management. I don’t know much about Alaska at all, but it seems the common thing is people debate the scope clause a bunch it seems. |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2977705)
trust me I understand more than you know, I miss the airways work rules.
I don’t know much about Alaska at all, but it seems the common thing is people debate the scope clause a bunch it seems. |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2977688)
we have profit sharing, but not as good as others. Managements initial contract opener had the same formula as deltas so better profit sharing is on the way.
many QOL work rules need to be addressed. Along with better LTD and a few other things. I’m sure some will be fixed and some will remain the same once we get a contract (been in negotiations for a year now). FWIW on the APA forums most guys are negative (like all pilots) and assume that this will somehow reduce our narrowbody flights into Seattle. Hopefully it’s a win win for both sides. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 2977641)
AA work rules? No thank you
The AA work rule problems are reassignments. Other than that they’re pretty much industry standard. I work 6 days this month for 77 hours and 9 days next month for 79 because of some of work rules (IMAX). |
Originally Posted by mainlineAF
(Post 2977751)
The AA work rule problems are reassignments. Other than that they’re pretty much industry standard.
I work 6 days this month for 77 hours and 9 days next month for 79 because of some of work rules (IMAX). |
I got a lot of friends at AMR... they all got 18-15 days a month off. The 18 are w/b FO’s out of DFW and LAX.
I made 31k in profit sharing last year... let me guess, you made 60k with your 1.4% right? shy let me explain imax... for him it means he drinks XX, so he never has to work, makes the most money, is the best looking... don’t you just wish you were him |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2977664)
uhm I hate to break it to you but AMR is making only $12 more an hour for a 12 year captain, with no profit sharing, more expensive medical, and .5 percent better 401k.... careful what you wish for, I am confident we are already making more.
I think your confused, people want to go to AMR for their W/B, not lackluster N/B rates. I want AMR’s retirements and widebodies, that’s it. They by far have the worst contract of any of the big 4. Maybe I have bad info so please correct. Alaska has a 5 hr average duty period? That’s not good. We had that (5:10). It sucked. AA went to 5:15 ACD. You guys get 150% for premium? Same at AA. Trip rigs and sit rigs I think are about the same. So does it boil down to profit sharing? Honestly curious. We are in negotiations after all and any little contractual jewel you can share could be helpful. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands