Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska Blue and a LUV triangle >

Alaska Blue and a LUV triangle

Search
Notices

Alaska Blue and a LUV triangle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2020, 10:24 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by ASpilot0936 View Post
Where? I see no emails/bulletins
Ladner alluded that around 1100 had bid leaves of various kinds in an email he sent. It wasn’t an official award.
AK22 is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 10:28 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,173
Default

Originally Posted by AK22 View Post
Ladner alluded that around 1100 had bid leaves of various kinds in an email he sent. It wasn’t an official award.
Right... I guess I missed the alluding email you speak of... but the number is right! I get it though, I just stole the number from an alluded email and posted that number here to try and look smart 🙄.
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 10:28 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 628
Default

Anyone have any ideas how the bid went yesterday? I know it is being released on Monday but they did the awards yesterday.
FL410 is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 10:30 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Cessna 205
Posts: 227
Default

I’m guessing they are working on a position bid to be released almost simultaneous with the leave award.
clearandcold is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 02:05 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Slow news day?

For those not following, the max crisis had SWA actually reconsidering their single-fleet strategy. COVID aside, if the max grounding had occurred 5-7 years down the line it would have put SW into BK and possibly liquidation, too much of their fleet would have been max and therefore INOP (AS of course would be in the same boat in that scenario).
5-7 years down the road? Ridiculous theory in that the plane would have been flying those 5-7 years and thus anything like MCAS would have been long since rung out in hours of service testing.

And please don’t use the DC-10 as a bolster to your theory. Not even remotely in the same ball park when it was grounded in 1979.
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 07:16 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 45
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 View Post
Right🙄... Next time you see me, dress me down in public, lets see how that goes, speak up, you are a coward!

Should we all just meet up at 13 Coins, have it out with each other, have a cocktail and get this $hit over with? You guys are a bunch of Marys.
HGWT is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 08:31 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by HGWT View Post
Should we all just meet up at 13 Coins, have it out with each other, have a cocktail and get this $hit over with? You guys are a bunch of Marys.
I like the 13 Coins part. I’ll pass on the testosterone omelet.
WhaleSurfing is offline  
Old 07-17-2020, 09:14 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That's not correct in this case. I'm guessing Jet America and VX did not have scope limits on regional flying. I know VX didn't, they didn't even have a contract yet.

Many other majors have scope language which limits or prohibits ANY flying not performed by mainline. IIRC two obvious potential merger partners fall into that last category (WN and B6). HA has some regional feed, not sure what their scope is.

A merger partner's scope language (and everything else in the CBA) should be written to be binding on a successor company, which includes a new merged entity. So the deal could not be executed unless:

a) The other pilots agree to waive scope to the degree necessary to accommodate existing outsourced FFD.
b) OR the existing FFD is adjusted to comply with scope (that means FFD is eliminated in the case of WN/B6).

The new company would have to comply with the most restrictive limitations of each pilot group's contract, unless the pilots agree otherwise. Obviously there will eventually be an SLI and joint contract tailored to the new entity but that's not typically negotiated until after the merger is executed. Things like scope would have to be complied with on day one.

Historical example... the first time OO tried to buy EV, the EV pilots stuck to their guns on their contract, which OO found incompatible with their business plans, so the deal was called off.
All true and Horizon Air would still not be a part of any merger between Alaska Airlines and another air carrier. What would happen to them or McGee Air Service or other Alaska Air Group assets is anybody's guess...Being merged/stapled etc is 100% not an option as they would not be a party to the merger
9mikemike is offline  
Old 07-18-2020, 07:09 PM
  #59  
In the dumpster fire
 
SIUav8er's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 View Post
Right🙄... Next time you see me, dress me down in public, lets see how that goes, speak up, you are a coward!
This dudes retired! Nobody here "passes him every day" Unless you hang out at the gig harbor yacht club or whatever...
SIUav8er is offline  
Old 07-20-2020, 06:38 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
beancounter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 View Post
Everytime this dude writes, he only screams, “I’m a MORON”, for everyone to hear. I can’t think of one coherent thing he has ever written.
I'll back him up, you're a clueless moron.
beancounter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
MusicPilot
Alaska
47
08-03-2018 08:52 AM
benzoate
Major
0
02-07-2014 12:16 PM
Lone Palm
Regional
5
01-25-2011 09:48 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-30-2009 03:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices