Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Additional Max Order Rumored >

Additional Max Order Rumored

Search

Notices

Additional Max Order Rumored

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2021 | 07:49 AM
  #331  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
I'm always disappointed by the legacy folks litany of excuses of why they don't have an industry standard contract. The crux of their argument is that "Alaska is different."

The excuse making of why Alaska lags behind in contracts needs to end. Today.
well Alaska is different from the other airlines you mentioned.. Alaska is still here. To get a better contact you have to be willing to burn the house down. The older pilots with their pensions were not willing to do that. So, we have the contract they gave us.

They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives.
Reply
Old 11-12-2021 | 07:44 PM
  #332  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
well Alaska is different from the other airlines you mentioned.. Alaska is still here. To get a better contact you have to be willing to burn the house down. The older pilots with their pensions were not willing to do that. So, we have the contract they gave us.

They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives.
That might be the dumbest post of the year… Pure nonsense, dude you are clueless. Gross generalization about something you know absolutely nothing about. Perfect, are you a member of team marvel by chance?🤞🤞🤞
Reply
Old 11-13-2021 | 10:17 AM
  #333  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
That might be the dumbest post of the year… Pure nonsense, dude you are clueless. Gross generalization about something you know absolutely nothing about. Perfect, are you a member of team marvel by chance?🤞🤞🤞
well of course it’s a gross generalization, this is the Internet. It is however wrong to say I know nothing about it. Please enlighten us on how the pilot group fought tooth and nail to get scope before and after Kasher. How many Union leaders at that time ended up in Management after getting non industry standard contracts passed by the pilot group?

Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know.
Reply
Old 11-13-2021 | 10:28 AM
  #334  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

There's no quicker way to upset the old timers than to dispel the myth that they have the best jobs in the industry.

Or to call attention to their history of rolling over for the company in the hopes of securing a backdoor deal for the connected.

Being happy at Alaska requires multiple levels of denial. They don't appreciate anyone holding up mirrors.
Reply
Old 11-13-2021 | 12:12 PM
  #335  
Singlecoil's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 275
Likes: 4
From: Supine
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
well of course it’s a gross generalization, this is the Internet. It is however wrong to say I know nothing about it. Please enlighten us on how the pilot group fought tooth and nail to get scope before and after Kasher. How many Union leaders at that time ended up in Management after getting non industry standard contracts passed by the pilot group?

Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know.
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
Reply
Old 11-13-2021 | 04:48 PM
  #336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 331
Default

Originally Posted by Singlecoil
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
So now the primary leverage is getting an impasse declared for the 30 day cooling? What do you honestly think the chances are of that.
Reply
Old 11-13-2021 | 10:16 PM
  #337  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
So now the primary leverage is getting an impasse declared for the 30 day cooling? What do you honestly think the chances are of that.
Pretty good given enough time. What's your depth of experience that makes you think it's unlikely? Pinnacle?

Please inform us on your experience with the NMB.
Reply
Old 11-14-2021 | 06:08 AM
  #338  
Jetspeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
Pretty good given enough time. What's your depth of experience that makes you think it's unlikely? Pinnacle?

Please inform us on your experience with the NMB.
You obviously didn't pay attention to Frontier's experience with the NMB. We were the textbook case for being released, but the NMB went silent when we asked them to declare an impasse in 2018.
Reply
Old 11-14-2021 | 08:53 AM
  #339  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 425
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Jetspeed
You obviously didn't pay attention to Frontier's experience with the NMB. We were the textbook case for being released, but the NMB went silent when we asked them to declare an impasse in 2018.
Seems you didn't pray hard enough.
Reply
Old 11-14-2021 | 09:14 AM
  #340  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Singlecoil
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
what will makes us lose direction is making posts like this and forgetting about 2009. Did it slip your mind? You know, the contact where pilots on property kept their pension. No room for scope improvements in that contract?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Major
65
08-28-2020 08:18 PM
sMFer
Southwest
49
06-30-2019 03:13 AM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM
VictorAW
Major
93
11-24-2014 01:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices