Additional Max Order Rumored
#331
Banned
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives.
#332
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
well Alaska is different from the other airlines you mentioned.. Alaska is still here. To get a better contact you have to be willing to burn the house down. The older pilots with their pensions were not willing to do that. So, we have the contract they gave us.
They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives.
They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives.
#333
Banned
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know.
#334
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
There's no quicker way to upset the old timers than to dispel the myth that they have the best jobs in the industry.
Or to call attention to their history of rolling over for the company in the hopes of securing a backdoor deal for the connected.
Being happy at Alaska requires multiple levels of denial. They don't appreciate anyone holding up mirrors.
Or to call attention to their history of rolling over for the company in the hopes of securing a backdoor deal for the connected.
Being happy at Alaska requires multiple levels of denial. They don't appreciate anyone holding up mirrors.
#335
well of course it’s a gross generalization, this is the Internet. It is however wrong to say I know nothing about it. Please enlighten us on how the pilot group fought tooth and nail to get scope before and after Kasher. How many Union leaders at that time ended up in Management after getting non industry standard contracts passed by the pilot group?
Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know.
Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know.
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
#336
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 331
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
#337
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Please inform us on your experience with the NMB.
#338
You obviously didn't pay attention to Frontier's experience with the NMB. We were the textbook case for being released, but the NMB went silent when we asked them to declare an impasse in 2018.
#339
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 425
Likes: 5
#340
Banned
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 149
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



