Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Additional Max Order Rumored >

Additional Max Order Rumored

Search

Notices

Additional Max Order Rumored

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2022 | 10:18 AM
  #431  
av8or's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 2
From: This side of the dirt.
Default

Originally Posted by Ala5ka
I think this is probably the best case scenario at this point..

i foresee it going differently. Hiring will stop, most junior are displaced back into the right seat… agree that we will for once be adequately staffed but the company will see that as excess meat on the bones… hiring will not resume for a long time. this will be used as contract negotiations continue. Company will say it’s fat on pilots and either accept a weak ta or prepare to furlough down to size. They’ll get their 51%. Sfo is closed. Bus is gone according to new schedule.

Qx is slowly dwindled down to nothing. Eventually those pilots will be slowly be given class dates at Alaska.. Alaska will use that as contract stall fodder for further negotiation cycles. They’ll argue as deserves less because it took less to get here blah blah blah.

sad but I believe it’s close to reality
Holy smokes dude. That’s the most “slit your wrists” post I’ve ever seen on this board….. and that’s saying somethin. JHC!!!
Reply
Old 03-26-2022 | 02:53 PM
  #432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

I asked the same sort of question in another thread, but with a mixed fleet of 217 aircraft now going to 241 737s at the end of 2023, that’s greater than 11% fleet growth in less than two years. If all options on future aircraft get executed (as they historically have been), that’s 44% fleet growth within 5 years for 314 737s by the of 2026. If the crew ratio stays the same, that’s a need for 1,300+ pilots in that five year span, but 217 more for mandatory retirements (from APCs numbers). So I get that in the next 18-24 months the displacement of Airbus pilots and absorption into the 737 training pipeline may cause issues, but in the long term how does any of this equal stagnation?
Reply
Old 03-26-2022 | 05:42 PM
  #433  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by RNO Flyer
I asked the same sort of question in another thread, but with a mixed fleet of 217 aircraft now going to 241 737s at the end of 2023, that’s greater than 11% fleet growth in less than two years. If all options on future aircraft get executed (as they historically have been), that’s 44% fleet growth within 5 years for 314 737s by the of 2026. If the crew ratio stays the same, that’s a need for 1,300+ pilots in that five year span, but 217 more for mandatory retirements (from APCs numbers). So I get that in the next 18-24 months the displacement of Airbus pilots and absorption into the 737 training pipeline may cause issues, but in the long term how does any of this equal stagnation?
How many of those are growth and how many are just replacements of Airbus that will be sold?
Reply
Old 03-26-2022 | 06:04 PM
  #434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
How many of those are growth and how many are just replacements of Airbus that will be sold?
I'm just going off of slide 37 in the investor presentation marked "Fleet Evolution 2019-2026" which shows 396 total aircraft in 2026, including the Horizon E175s. Slide 32 shows there will be 82 E175s, so IF all options are executed that's 314 737s on mainline in 2026.
Reply
Old 03-26-2022 | 06:18 PM
  #435  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by RNO Flyer
I'm just going off of slide 37 in the investor presentation marked "Fleet Evolution 2019-2026" which shows 396 total aircraft in 2026, including the Horizon E175s. Slide 32 shows there will be 82 E175s, so IF all options are executed that's 314 737s on mainline in 2026.
If Planespotter is correct, Alaska has 35 A320s and 10 A321s. If they all are replaced with 737s, that would be a significant portion of the “growth” of the 737s.
Reply
Old 03-26-2022 | 07:42 PM
  #436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
If Planespotter is correct, Alaska has 35 A320s and 10 A321s. If they all are replaced with 737s, that would be a significant portion of the “growth” of the 737s.
This is what I’m looking at. Options for 2026 are on top of this a couple slides later in the presentation:

Training
Reply
Old 03-27-2022 | 03:43 AM
  #437  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by airb320
Hahahaha… “13% Synergies”… with the way you ‘legacy’ guys screwed up the contract, the one nobody ever voted yes on🤦‍♀️🤣, in Managements favor, the benefit will be 4-6% at best… just correcting your “brilliant” forecasting skills🤯
You really think Single fleet and PBS will only create “4-6% at best”… You must be a 2009 hire at VX🤣. 2+7+4=, oh man wait how does one add three numbers and in what order. 🤔😂…

Displacements will flush out about 300ish A320 positions over the next 8 months, hiring will continue just at a slower pace, everyone will be fine.
Reply
Old 03-27-2022 | 06:50 AM
  #438  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Sounds like someone’s bitter that he’s junior to a 2009 hire
Reply
Old 03-27-2022 | 07:42 AM
  #439  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

I assure you they are all way behind me on the list😂… As a group, they are by far the worst performers in transition 🤔

Some 06-and a few 07’s got me🙄 I get them when I Nonrev and bid vacation days… I would still take my A-plan above their couple of numbers though
Reply
Old 03-27-2022 | 09:35 AM
  #440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
As a group, they are by far the worst performers in transition 🤔

Some 06-and a few 07’s got me🙄
Different view. The Boeing training crowd as a whole are generally yes men. They live mostly on a diet of cool aid drinking new hire suck-ups and glee club Boeing co-pilot upgrades. The CQ crowd just want to slide through like a well oil turd so they salute, klick heels and go home. Then along come pilots who no longer give a flying eff…They actually expect transition “training”not transition “checking”…The Boeing instructors take affront to this idea and label it “poor performance”…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Major
65
08-28-2020 08:18 PM
sMFer
Southwest
49
06-30-2019 03:13 AM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM
VictorAW
Major
93
11-24-2014 01:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices