New hire bases
#491
JR needs the share price to go up. He's not in this to stroke his ego. Where is he going to get that by shrinking the airline? Having a 50% profit margin with 25% of the current turn over is an obvious fail, and while MG may be the biggest stake holder, the remaining 80% of the shareholders will have no issue in replacing the whole board if they do that. JR will do a Homer in to the hedge (meme) and he isn't going to let that happen if you are right about his ego.
No, the only thing that will prevail here is an attempt to grow the turnover and the profit margin. Neither of which happen without the airline growing.
No, the only thing that will prevail here is an attempt to grow the turnover and the profit margin. Neither of which happen without the airline growing.
#492
I am also starting to question the whole MG future. If he is going to continue to micro manage the airline or even be heavily involved, why step down from the CEO position. (there was a rumor not too long back he may have health issues). I bet that we hear less and less from him or about him over the coming months. Give it time and you may end up with a bundh of pilots here who don't even know who he is.
#493
Come on, there is a limit. He may own the BOD, but he does not control the share price. It tanks and he's screwed.
I am also starting to question the whole MG future. If he is going to continue to micro manage the airline or even be heavily involved, why step down from the CEO position. (there was a rumor not too long back he may have health issues). I bet that we hear less and less from him or about him over the coming months. Give it time and you may end up with a bundh of pilots here who don't even know who he is.
I am also starting to question the whole MG future. If he is going to continue to micro manage the airline or even be heavily involved, why step down from the CEO position. (there was a rumor not too long back he may have health issues). I bet that we hear less and less from him or about him over the coming months. Give it time and you may end up with a bundh of pilots here who don't even know who he is.
He stepped back publicly because if all it goes south (and it's heading that way) he can blame someone else.
#494
There are a bunch of people on here who have it all figured out and KNOW exactly what's going to happen in the next year. Doom and Gloom for sure! The problem is, just like with this post, no one spends the time to get any facts before spewing their "knowledge."
Anyone with 1st grade reading comprehension can open our CBA to Section 26. It's a whopping one whole paragraph that says the CBA runs until July 29, 2021 and can be amended if written intent is given between 90-180 days prior to that date. The last time I perused a calendar, it's not July (or even February) 2023. Which means your two year comment is ridiculous and you should have been called out on it in the first couple of posts. However, the other guys that "know" what's going to happen are just as intellectually lazy. If I remember the actual timeline correctly (should be backed up by the union videos), the union sent the letter of intent to open negotiations in February (which was at the beginning of the window). After that I don't think the company met with the union until April to work out the details. Then, I believe negotiations started in June with the first TAs at the end of that month. According to the last video, I think the union said there were seven TAs (Medical Standards, Furlough, Seniority, CA Auth, POW, Union Security, and Union Business not in the video specifically, but pieced together). Granted, most were “throw-away” sections, unless they happen to have affected you personally, but still seven.
Thus, in the real world, we have been negotiating for a year and have seven TAs vs your ridiculous claim of two years and two sections. At least misinform in the realm of the actual truth. Better yet just take 20 minutes and get the facts and post those instead. It's laughable that YOU said "Here's the math." And to be honest, I hope the legacies DO get the details of their TAs out before we agree on one. Let them raise the bar and set the standard this time. If that happens, maybe we won't be underpaid by 30% by the end of next year.
As for my own editorial commentary (no real or imagined crystal ball), I would be surprised if we don't have a TA this year. If we don't, there are some tough times ahead.
#495
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 207
Seriously, there are enough negatives about the company that you shouldn't need to fabricate misinformation to make it seem worse.
There are a bunch of people on here who have it all figured out and KNOW exactly what's going to happen in the next year. Doom and Gloom for sure! The problem is, just like with this post, no one spends the time to get any facts before spewing their "knowledge."
Anyone with 1st grade reading comprehension can open our CBA to Section 26. It's a whopping one whole paragraph that says the CBA runs until July 29, 2021 and can be amended if written intent is given between 90-180 days prior to that date. The last time I perused a calendar, it's not July (or even February) 2023. Which means your two year comment is ridiculous and you should have been called out on it in the first couple of posts. However, the other guys that "know" what's going to happen are just as intellectually lazy. If I remember the actual timeline correctly (should be backed up by the union videos), the union sent the letter of intent to open negotiations in February (which was at the beginning of the window). After that I don't think the company met with the union until April to work out the details. Then, I believe negotiations started in June with the first TAs at the end of that month. According to the last video, I think the union said there were seven TAs (Medical Standards, Furlough, Seniority, CA Auth, POW, Union Security, and Union Business not in the video specifically, but pieced together). Granted, most were “throw-away” sections, unless they happen to have affected you personally, but still seven.
Thus, in the real world, we have been negotiating for a year and have seven TAs vs your ridiculous claim of two years and two sections. At least misinform in the realm of the actual truth. Better yet just take 20 minutes and get the facts and post those instead. It's laughable that YOU said "Here's the math." And to be honest, I hope the legacies DO get the details of their TAs out before we agree on one. Let them raise the bar and set the standard this time. If that happens, maybe we won't be underpaid by 30% by the end of next year.
As for my own editorial commentary (no real or imagined crystal ball), I would be surprised if we don't have a TA this year. If we don't, there are some tough times ahead.
There are a bunch of people on here who have it all figured out and KNOW exactly what's going to happen in the next year. Doom and Gloom for sure! The problem is, just like with this post, no one spends the time to get any facts before spewing their "knowledge."
Anyone with 1st grade reading comprehension can open our CBA to Section 26. It's a whopping one whole paragraph that says the CBA runs until July 29, 2021 and can be amended if written intent is given between 90-180 days prior to that date. The last time I perused a calendar, it's not July (or even February) 2023. Which means your two year comment is ridiculous and you should have been called out on it in the first couple of posts. However, the other guys that "know" what's going to happen are just as intellectually lazy. If I remember the actual timeline correctly (should be backed up by the union videos), the union sent the letter of intent to open negotiations in February (which was at the beginning of the window). After that I don't think the company met with the union until April to work out the details. Then, I believe negotiations started in June with the first TAs at the end of that month. According to the last video, I think the union said there were seven TAs (Medical Standards, Furlough, Seniority, CA Auth, POW, Union Security, and Union Business not in the video specifically, but pieced together). Granted, most were “throw-away” sections, unless they happen to have affected you personally, but still seven.
Thus, in the real world, we have been negotiating for a year and have seven TAs vs your ridiculous claim of two years and two sections. At least misinform in the realm of the actual truth. Better yet just take 20 minutes and get the facts and post those instead. It's laughable that YOU said "Here's the math." And to be honest, I hope the legacies DO get the details of their TAs out before we agree on one. Let them raise the bar and set the standard this time. If that happens, maybe we won't be underpaid by 30% by the end of next year.
As for my own editorial commentary (no real or imagined crystal ball), I would be surprised if we don't have a TA this year. If we don't, there are some tough times ahead.
It’s a turd sandwich but it’s not the one Marg, Nate, and KC are selling.
#496
As was pointed out on the facebook page, a section that was TA'd may need to be revisited if the negotiations drag - they might be out of date 6 months later.
#497
JR isn't there to stroke his ego. He isn't there as a fall guy. I think Maury's time is up at the helm, maybe he wants to be running the Bates Motel on the water. Maybe he's sick and can't continue. Maybe his wife put her foot down.
A lot will be revealed in the next 12-18 months.
#498
Yes it will.
#500
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post